VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 36
  1. South Korean company BeAll has announced that it will start shipping 4x DVD-R recordable discs to which consumers can record up to 4.85 GB of data or 124 minutes of DVD video. This an increase of 0.15 GB when compared to regular 4.7 GB DVD recordables.
    http://www.cdfreaks.com/news/10487


    Wow, a whole 0.15GB increase!
    Quote Quote  
  2. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    I don't even see how this is possible.
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member GizmoTheGremlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Search Comp PM
    This seems slightly better than useless. I wonder if the price will be much more.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Master of Time & Space Capmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO United States
    Search Comp PM
    Especially since the original size doesn't record 4.7GB. It never did. They're just perpetuating the phony byte count and confusing people more.

    Damn marketing types
    Quote Quote  
  5. Hot damn! I can get 87 extra minutes of porn on my DVDs!

    YEEEE-HAAAWW!

    Disclaimer: Sarcasm.
    Quote Quote  
  6. correction 4mins
    Quote Quote  
  7. I'm a Super Moderator johns0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    canada
    Search Comp PM
    Wow! Now i dont have to buy a dual layer burner.
    I think,therefore i am a hamster.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Master of Time & Space Capmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by johns0
    Wow! Now i dont have to buy a dual layer burner.
    Yay. What are you going to do with that extra 150MB? Maybe use DTS instead of AC3 audio? Woo Hoo!
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member louv68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis, USA
    Search Comp PM
    A 15% increase comes out to about 650mb or so more. Sounds nice to me.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by louv68
    A 15% increase comes out to about 650mb or so more. Sounds nice to me.
    Me too.

    Too bad it's only 150megs. It says 0.15GB, not 15%.
    I don't have a bad attitude...
    Life has a bad attitude!
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member louv68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis, USA
    Search Comp PM
    My mistake. Not 650mb but 150mb more.

    This site gives a little bit more details about these discs.
    http://www.speedlabs.org/
    Quote Quote  
  12. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    You're all wrong.
    This is 4.85 "GIG" not 4.85GB
    Just like 4.7 "GIG" is 4.38GB

    You're gaining almost nothing.
    Where's a math whiz that can make 4.85 "GIG" a real computer GB number? It's not me.
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member corrax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Here's the real measurement:

    1 gigabyte = 1,073,741,824 bytes

    They like to advertise the storage space as truncated number rather than dividing it. Hard disk manufacturers do it too.

    They are converting 4,850,000,000 into 4.85GB.

    In reality: 4,850,000,000 bytes = 4.51GB

    This is an increase of about 140MB. Sounds pretty worthless to me.
    Quote Quote  
  14. Member louv68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis, USA
    Search Comp PM
    http://www.onlineconversion.com/computer.htm

    4.38GB = 4485.12mb

    .15GB = about 153.6mb

    Total disc space should be around 4638.72mb
    Quote Quote  
  15. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    I'm sure like past BeAll discs (LD, etc), these will just freeze at the end anyway.
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  16. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Search Comp PM
    louv68 when Beall Says .15 GB they mean 150,000,000 bytes =143.05 MB in digital world
    Quote Quote  
  17. Member louv68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis, USA
    Search Comp PM
    You are definitely right corwin102
    Quote Quote  
  18. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    Hello,

    Originally Posted by Lordsmurf
    I'm sure like past BeAll discs (LD, etc), these will just freeze at the end anyway.
    Maybe they're doing this so it takes a few minutes longer to freeze!!

    Kevin
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  19. Originally Posted by lordsmurf
    I'm sure like past BeAll discs (LD, etc), these will just freeze at the end anyway.
    The white printable BeAll 4x DVD-Rs that I use to use were the best DVD-Rs I ever burned as far as errors/compatibility goes. All played fine at the end without any skipping. These were burned with an NEC-2500a, most of them using Herrie's hacked firmware to burn them at 8x.

    The only problems that I had with them is that they took forever to dry when printing on them with an Epson R300. They were also more expensive than the quicker drying ProDisc S03 printables that I ended up buying as a replacement to the BeAlls.

    jawgee
    Quote Quote  
  20. Member waheed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Search Comp PM
    Its pretty useless bringing out 4.85GB DVD-R discs at this time when dual layer 8.5GB disks are already out.

    its only a matter of time for DL disks to fall in price.
    Quote Quote  
  21. Nero disc info shows the be all 4.85gb dvd-r discs to be 4620mb available space. Does anybody know what program will burn a video ts file close to that size to disc without canceling the burn before it starts? Any and all info appreciated. ................... harrymj3
    Quote Quote  
  22. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The bottom of the planet
    Search Comp PM
    Perhaps we ought to round up all the ma-and-pa-Kettle type users who were caught out by the 4.35/4.7GB thing and start a class action for false advertising against the manufacturers.

    4.85 GB in real terms is 5207647846.4 bytes. Just in case anyone cares.
    "It's getting to the point now when I'm with you, I no longer want to have something stuck in my eye..."
    Quote Quote  
  23. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Gil T Pleasure
    South Korean company BeAll has announced that it will start shipping 4x DVD-R recordable discs to which consumers can record up to 4.85 GB of data or 124 minutes of DVD video. This an increase of 0.15 GB when compared to regular 4.7 GB DVD recordables.
    http://www.cdfreaks.com/news/10487


    Wow, a whole 0.15GB increase!
    That's great, one more choice on capacities!
    Sam Ontario
    Quote Quote  
  24. Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Nilfennasion
    Perhaps we ought to round up all the ma-and-pa-Kettle type users who were caught out by the 4.35/4.7GB thing and start a class action for false advertising against the manufacturers.

    4.85 GB in real terms is 5207647846.4 bytes. Just in case anyone cares.
    It's no more false advertising than HDD manufacturers labeling their products as 300GB storage capacity when in fact it's 287GB.
    Quote Quote  
  25. Member mats.hogberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sweden (PAL)
    Search Comp PM
    ...or MP3 players, or Memory sticks or Compact Flash Discs or...

    /Mats
    Quote Quote  
  26. My mystery is solved. Nero Express or Nero Recode both will burn the disc to 4.600gb+ after clicking the refresh button in disc info. Nice for vhs to dvd conversions where you can use all the space available.............. harrymj3
    Quote Quote  
  27. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    A Yellow Submarine
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by lordsmurf
    I don't even see how this is possible.
    They probably accomplished it the same way the manufacturers did with CD media by stretching the standards. Luckily, I think they did that shortly after consumers started making their CDs, so the new larger discs were able o catch on quickly and hardware companies started to support the technically non-standard discs. Also, at that time I think we were moving from the practice of buying devices that last forever to getting cheap hardware that is more economical to replace. As a result, not many people had old devices that wouldn't play the new CDs, so compatibility wasn't much of a problem.

    With these new DVDs, it will probably be "hit or miss" whether or not a given piece of hardware will support the greater capacity even though they claim it will work with. Thus, to ensure compatibility, I will stick with the "4.7GB" discs until more comes out about how compatible the 4.85 discs are.
    Quote Quote  
  28. I'm a MEGA Super Moderator Baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Sweden
    Search Comp PM
    Added the 4.85GB size in the dvd media list, add new media here.
    Quote Quote  
  29. Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Just like CD-Rs, DVD+/-R discs will slowly start encroaching on the LEAD-IN/OUT regions to increase their sizes.

    150MB is a good start. Is there a burning program and burner that can overburn DVD-Rs? Also, has an overburning standard yet been announced? Haven't been paying too much attention to this, so I don't know...
    ICBM target coordinates:
    26° 14' 10.16"N -- 80° 16' 0.91"W
    Quote Quote  
  30. Member Cornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Deep in the Heart of Texas
    Search PM
    To add to Donny661's explanation,

    I believe that the CD spec originally had lots of leeway for error (in terms of tightness of the spiral, etc) and purposefully kept the "official" size artificially somewhat low for a number of years, until it became clear that the processes for creating both ROM, R, and RW media and the techniques for reading/writing them all went way past the original technology. Once it was seen that this could consistently be done with little, if any, error, they bumped up the spec.

    Originally, AudioCD's rarely went past 63 minutes, and CDROM's rarely went past 500MB. Originally 63min CD-R's were the norm, then they moved to 74, then to 80. Over that has always been considered non-standard by the industry, although many of you know that you can still successfully work above that.

    DVD, OTOH, has much stricter tolerances, and in a sense has learned all the tricks of packing things in tighter-from all the "mistakes" made in the CD spec. Therefore, there is less room to manuever--less area of the disc to make additional use of and less space between the spirals with which to pack more tightly.

    I don't see this as being a very good idea technically. High quality/compatibility, low error DL discs makes much more sense from the consumer point of view.

    Scott
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!