Go back to sleep doc.
It is too early for you.
I will feed einstein.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 60 of 72
-
-
Originally Posted by yoda313
2 - defending mal-adjusted behavior by associating it with other mal-adjusted behavior is not viable defense. They do it too so it must be alright. I think most of us passed this after 3rd grade...but apparently not trekkers.
3 - football fans that go above and beyond is different than being a sci-fi wackjob. Football fans are cheering and rooting for real people in a real contest. If trekkers would like to attend a taping of the show and come dressed in all their gear and cheer captain kirk on then great, I see nothing wrong with that. But those football fans don't walk the streets with their faces painted or wear their shoulder pads with the spikes on them to work. I do agree that some of those dudes are out there, but still, the things they are representing are REAL....as shocking as it may seem....Star Trek and Star Wars are not REAL.....they are make believe. The Oakland Raiders are real, the Pittsburgh Steelers are real, the 57' Corvette is real, the 69' Z-28 is real.
You made no point yoda other than to exemplify the example already presented. We get you, we know what you are all about, I spared you the quotes of how many times you mention SW or ST...save yourself future frustration...you are the only one here that is into either of those 2 things as deeply as you apparently are. If you are fishing for friends then you aren't going to find too many here who are THAT into SW or ST. -
Hello,
Northcat - fine, I'm unique then. So what if I'm the only one here that into scifi? I'm ok with it. And I do know what obsession is and I don't think I'm too far out there - your view is obviously different.
KevinDonatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw? -
It is not called trekkers
Here is the website.
http://www.trekdoc.com/
A simple google search was all that was needed. -
Originally Posted by northcat_8Hello.
-
Originally Posted by gitreel
B5 was better though, they went all sorts of places, had two galactic wars, overthrew the government on earth and even travelled through time. top notch stuff!
Cardboard trek = two thumbs up
TNG = two thumbs up
DS9 = one thumb up
VGER = one up, one down (that whiny kes character pissed me off)
enterprise = can suck my balls. i keep hoping, DESPERATLEY hoping, that any moment Al will appear and tell him that Ziggy worked out what he needs to do. The technology is too good, and.... it's just all wrong. a series following zephram cochrane would have been better - established character and some actual pioneering spirit. we could have first trip to mars, first trip to alpha centauri, etc. or, show us the enterprise B, we've seen it, i think we've even seen her captain. revisit the places kirk had been and show us some more proper adventures.
enterprise blows. as does it's intro music. -
Originally Posted by flaninacupboard
How hard is that to understand?
That is my reason for not liking it. That is not wrong. That is just my opinion. That is my story and I'm sticking to it. -
Hello,
Originally Posted by flan
Originally Posted by Tommyknocker
KevinDonatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw? -
well, the station did move. it moved in the very first episode. and the characters moved around a lot. once they had the defiant and the gem'hdar ship they spent a lot of time away from the station.
-
Ok, but my point is that the other series were set up with the space ship exploring new worlds and cultures not a station.
-
Originally Posted by Tommyknocker
How about WWF/WWE/WWX(whatever that bag of shit is called) wrestling, that is scripted - thus just as imaginary as star trek. no-one gets the piss taken for wearing a t-shirt of their favourite wrestler, or going to a wrestling "convention".
People get defensive about "their" team. the stupidest is ******* Manchester united, people who don't even live in manchester, or even the UK say they are man U supporters. -
I doubt the sci fi thing is really dying, let alone for StarWars or StarTrek in any little bit. The sputters were ovbviously done because of much larger budget and anticipated films coming out around the same time. I do think that StarTrek can still get back to the original illudement of the Borg being earth creation (First Contact being a stong link) Voyager. I agree, an a** kicking of the Federation is in order with a follow up sequel to fight back. Using the people of the newer shows would be a great way to catch the action from different sections of the galaxy. Have a planet or 2 be assimilated or destroyed with a hint of many others that fell along the same state. I'm sure it will get a serious draw. The thought in the storyline alone practically writes itself.
Again, sci fi won't die, it'll just spread amongst many different areas. It's still pretty cool to see today. -
Hello,
Doramius - Yeah it'll survive. They just should have waited after Voyager was done before starting the next series.
KevinDonatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw? -
What time period is Enterprise in? I never watched it. It's on at times when I'm not available. I caught part of one and I felt like it was between OST and TNG. But part of it made me think it layed among the time period of DS9 & Voyager.
-
Originally Posted by Tommyknocker
The only reason you have so many riots at sokker games is because it is freakin boring that the fans need to have something to do to pass the time. I believe psychologists call it "stir crazy".
<and yea, I know how it is spelled correctly, I just said it to fire up the cross ponders> and besides the entire arguement was just to fire up yoda...so back off tommyknocker, you are spoiling my fun -
Originally Posted by flaninacupboard
-
ST N SW SUXORS.. M4TR1X PWNS U ALL!!!
Nothing can stop me now, 'cause I don't care anymore. -
Originally Posted by northcat_8Hello.
-
I actually liked DS9 quite a bit near the end. I've not really been able to get into anything since. Series to bring them back? Sure its been said, big giant NASTY War, Semi-episodic. BOOM they are back.
-
Originally Posted by FlaystusHello.
-
All Star Trek series get better in the latter seasons...
TNG was mostly crap in the first and second seasons with some gems sprinkled in between. Basically, the dynamics between the characters hadn't established itself yet and nor had the general "history arc" of the time frame. TNG from season 3 onwards is awesome, and IMHO, seasons 5, 6 and 7 contain some of the best Star Trek ever. It helps that they actually had some good actors in TNG (i.e., Patrick Stewart and Brent Spiner).
DS9 -- I personally think that this series probably started off the best compared to the other series... but because it IS located just in one spot, the story lines do get a little bit boring. And frankly, the characters aren't too interesting and the actors aren't that good. DS9 probably does have the best "story arc" though with the Dominion War, but I don't think that the characters/actors were able to pull in through.
Voyager -- basically like TNG but with weaker characters. What can I say ... the characters are BORING. e.g., Harry Kim -- why does he exist? And Kes is just damn annoying. The series gets MUCH better when Kes leaves and 7 of 9 joins. The problem with the series is that 7 of 9 and the Doctor are the most interesting characters AND are the best actors but neither of them are really the main characters.
Enterprise? I can't bring up sufficient interest to sit through an entire episode. CRAP. The series could at least integrate itself with the established Star Trek timeline. Neither the ship or the crew look like they are from the pre-Kirk period.
Star Trek needs a hiatus. Enterprise should be killed. It should just live in movies for a while... perhaps VOY/DS9 type storylines rather than TNG. I think that the TNG potential for movies died when they killed off Data in Nemesis. WHY??? Having yet ANOTHER "Soong-type" android conveniently floating around just doesn't make sense.
Regards.Michael Tam
w: Morsels of Evidence -
Originally Posted by Tommyknocker
Originally Posted by Tommyknocker
Oh and Tommyknocker....dude, get some black friends but don't say "you go, boy" around them...unless you are female...if you are male that just sounds gay and they will beat your ass for it. -
Hello,
Northcat - Drop it, please.
Kevin
---we are who we are and not much will change that, certainly not writing in an offtopic forum. I like who I am so that's all that matters. If other people write back and like talking about Sci Fi more power to them.---Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw? -
Jesus wept, what a bunch of ******* nerds. :P
Buddha says that, while he may show you the way, only you can truly save yourself, proving once and for all that he's a lazy, fat bastard. -
Originally Posted by VCDHunter
And darn proud of it!!! :P :P
KevinDonatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw? -
Babylon 5 for ever! Star Trek is only for ealry teenagers!!!!
Vorlon SatStorm
Really now, STos ok, STng ok. DS9 is a B5 Spin off but some like it so let's say it's OK.
Voyager ... well... Only the "doctor" episodes are good (IMHO).
Enterprise: BS. Ultra BS. Super mega BS. Crappy BS. Need to say more? Especially those intro credits, which when you are not American you simply hate. Reminds me that Malboro man of the 70s. FO. BS.
And it has to be P.C.
BS. BS. BS.
To be fair, the SciFi gentre has problems nowdays. Point me one good SciFi show today, the classic way (space, etc).
I believe people back in the 60s and 70s used the SciFi gentre to talk things they couldn't any other way. That was the reason SciFi was interest back then. Not the "future technology".
Only Babylon 5 bring new topics to the SciFi gentre. Combined elements from DrWho to StarTrek Original Series and from Blake 7 to Starwars!
Babylon 5 is the model for the gentre to adapt. Unfortunatelly, or the crowed is stupid and don't like this model, or the big ones decided that we are stupid and we won't like that model anyway...
I hope that gonna change. -
Originally Posted by SatStorm
Babylon 5??? Was that a show??? OH yeah... Wasn't that the one with Bruce Boxlitner???
KevinDonatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw? -
I don't care who was staring...
I cared about the story I was watching.
And the action was so much fast, I didn't have the time to realise who was starring.
Each episode of B5 could be a season's story for Enterprise! -
Hello,
Satstorm - Weren't they one of the first to use all digital effects?? The show was different.
KevinDonatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
Similar Threads
-
Trek alert - PBS Pioneers of Television series on Star Trek and Twi Zone
By edDV in forum Off topicReplies: 18Last Post: 2nd Feb 2011, 06:36 -
My First Star Trek Movie
By M Bruner in forum Off topicReplies: 6Last Post: 6th Jun 2009, 18:24 -
Star Trek, which show is better?
By SanderMan in forum Off topicReplies: 105Last Post: 22nd Dec 2008, 18:23 -
Star Trek vs. Batman fanfilm
By freebird73717 in forum Off topicReplies: 0Last Post: 20th Aug 2008, 16:42 -
Star Trek TOS Question?
By wulf109 in forum DVD RippingReplies: 2Last Post: 5th Jul 2007, 01:36