I am looking at two capture cards:
Terratec Cinergy 400XE (SAA7134) and Leadtek Winfast TV2K Expert (CX23881). Afaik the Conexant has a 10bit ADC and the Philips a 9bit, nevertheless people say the image quality of the Philips is slightly better. How come?
I am planning on using it to capture from a Sat Receiver thru RFout (worse quality) or Scart (better). Which one of the two cards do you recommend?
Final output will be MPEG2 for DVD authoring or possibly MPEG4 for a standalone DVD Player with Mpeg4 support. PC is fast enough to encode in realtime (2.6C, 1GB DDR466)
Thanks for any advice.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
-
-
There are about the same
Conexant CX23881 has better 3rd party support
Philips SAA7134 support PAL needs better (overall)
So, for the PAL users, you have a better chip (conexant) vs a PAL optimised chip (philips).
Later drivers always eliminate the difference on this, but the first impressions are always what stays in the minds of the users. -
thx satstorm,
after reading a bit, i found out that the current Conexant drivers do not support the full 10bit capability of the Adc, but i'm sure the future ones will. So with this thought in mind i think i'm gonna settle for the Leadtek (Conexant)
Similar Threads
-
Philips 3455dvdr stays on philips logo
By vbdanl in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 7Last Post: 14th Sep 2010, 10:15 -
operating system advice / bt878 / saa7134 / hardware config
By jafvid in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 16Last Post: 23rd Mar 2010, 17:46 -
Can Philips 5990 firmware be used on Philips 5992 Dvd Player
By peggypwr1 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 2Last Post: 23rd Mar 2010, 16:06 -
bt conexant 878a darker band on bottom has appeared
By video_magic in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 0Last Post: 3rd May 2009, 22:41 -
Which is better? Conexant CX23881 or Phillips TDA8290, TDA8275 Chip
By ffxdean in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 3Last Post: 15th Jul 2007, 20:55