just like the topic says. Currently, I have been using 224kpbs. I don't have surround sound right now but will probably be getting some sometime soon. Do you think that I should raise the bitrate or I probably wouldn't really even notice a difference?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
-
May last one I used 192.
"Art is making something out of nothing and selling it." - Frank Zappa -
You can go as hi as 700+k, that should be indistinguishable from the original even to the most golden ears. But 192k for stereo and 224k for surround sounds good.
Corned beef is now made to a higher standard than at any time in history.
The electronic components of the power part adopted a lot of Rubycons. -
I use 224 for 2 channel stereo.
-
256 is what the BBC use for digital satellite / terrestrial transmissions. 192 is used on a lot of commercial "TV Series" DVD's.
-
I use 256k.
If making a short disc i use 9000k video and 448k audio. -
I as well use a rate of 224 for stereo encoding and 448 or more for 5.1 May be overkill, but the quality change is un-noticable..............
Similar Threads
-
converting movie ntsc>pal audio-besweet "wav to wav" option not showing?
By extent in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 2Last Post: 11th Jun 2010, 12:38 -
AC3 to WAV = Wav has no audio??
By RobV in forum AudioReplies: 5Last Post: 31st May 2010, 15:26 -
stereo loss after converting from wav to ac3
By Driber in forum AudioReplies: 8Last Post: 9th Sep 2009, 02:29 -
Converting WAV to AC3 - sound loss
By MackemX in forum AudioReplies: 10Last Post: 19th Mar 2009, 15:15 -
Hiss removal from AC3 file without converting it to WAV?
By Turbo Sensonic in forum AudioReplies: 21Last Post: 7th Jul 2007, 06:18