I have a Divx file, and I think that it's a Dvd rip. It is a 23.976 fps 200 MB 20 min 576x432 .avi. I know Dvd's are always 29.97 fps interlaced. Furthermore, if you are using NTSCFilm, you always do the encode with a 3:2 Pulldown tag to make sure it plays back at 29.97 fps on the Dvd Player. My source is anime. Anime is usually 23.976 fps non-interlaced, but since my source is a dvd rip, it is different. In its Dvd form, it was probably 29.97 fps (or 23.976 fps with 3:2 Pulldown tag) and interlaced. Now, it is 23.976 fps and I'm also guessing it was de-interlaced (because now it is non-interlace) when converted to Divx to be viewed on a computer. I am now reencoding to Dvd. Should I use a 3:2 Pulldown? What about the interlace issue? Once the interlace was removed, can it be recovered? I'm sorry, but I don't have knowledge of any of this stuff?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
-
-
animation is ussually 30fps progressive ...
the rest of your question - you lost me ...
what has this to do with "DVD to (S)VCD, AVI" ?
i'll move it somewhere .. else .."Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650) -
Well, regardless, my divx file is a dvd rip, but is now 23.976 fps and non-interlaced. Should I do 3:2 Pulldown on playback encoding even though my source has been taken from 29.97 fps to 23.976 fps and de-interlaced? As for the relevance, I think this forum is meant for everything about Dvd ripping, encoding, etc. I'm pretty sure my source is a Dvd rip. What's so irrelevant about that?
-
Use pulldown cause it was probably film to begin with and needs it again,once de-interlaced it cant be recovered.
I think,therefore i am a hamster. -
Why? That doesn't make any sense. A 3:2 Pulldown for encode mode will give it tag to play my 23.976 fps video as a 29.97 fps INTERLACED. If the interlace cannot be recovered, then why should I use this encode mode?
-
Try and encode at 23.976 and author to dvd and you will find out.The info that was included in the de-interlacing cant be recovered.
I think,therefore i am a hamster. -
Oh, for compatability, ok. What I don't get is why when the Dvd was ripped the person de-interlaced and converted the framerate to 23.976 fps in the first place. Thanks for the help.
-
Movies or clips are de-interlaced for the computer cause watching it would look really crappy cause of the interlace effect on a progressive screen.
I think,therefore i am a hamster. -
Oh, for compatability, ok. What I don't get is why when the Dvd was ripped the person de-interlaced and converted the framerate to 23.976 fps in the first place. Thanks for the help.
To learn more about this, do a search function about TELECINE, and INVERSE TELECINE. Your questions shall be answered more effectively..
Good luck!!! -
If the video is 23.976 then you re-encode at the same frame rate and include the pulldown flag, it's that simple.
Similar Threads
-
2:4 Pulldown
By supervehicle in forum Video ConversionReplies: 23Last Post: 3rd May 2011, 16:53 -
Correct pulldown or not
By carlmart in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 1st Feb 2009, 19:25 -
3:2 pulldown?
By blizzery in forum Video ConversionReplies: 3Last Post: 24th Jul 2007, 06:38 -
Using pulldown
By MysticE in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 14th Jul 2007, 03:25 -
Film Pulldown
By Soapm in forum SVCD2DVD & VOB2MPGReplies: 4Last Post: 18th Jun 2007, 12:20