I downloaded a Divx movie with 128kb 64/ch stereo audio. I extracted the audio to wave and then converted it to AC3 with AC3machine. I noticed a 400mb difference in size from from the wave file, the AC3 file is much smaller. Can someone tell me why, and is there any quality loss or is there a quality increase? Why do people recommend turning your wave files to AC3 files? Does the video conversion in Tmpgenc remain the same even when you're using AC3 audio?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
AC3 is a compressed format, while WAV is not. In my experience, the resultant AC3 file is about 1/4th the size of the starting WAV file.
Quality/Loss depends largely on what bitrate you select when converting to AC3. Likewise, the more times an audio file is converted to and from lossy compression methods (like MP3 and AC3) the worse the quality will be. There will certainly not be an increase in quality going to AC3 format. The best you can hope for is minimal degradation of quality.
I usually always compress my audio, unless I'm working on a project sufficiently small as to not notice the difference or there is a specific quality requirement. -
The conversion that I did was exactly the same 128kb as the original avi file. the wave file was 1.1gb the AC3 file was 611mb. When you use the Bitrate calculator does it take a wave file into account?
Similar Threads
-
replace ac3 2ch with ac3 5.1 ch in mkv (and sync)
By umbbra in forum AudioReplies: 1Last Post: 12th Jun 2010, 04:18 -
Convert stereo ac3 with bad channel to mono ac3
By chipsndukes in forum AudioReplies: 7Last Post: 5th Nov 2008, 11:23 -
How to convert AVI/DivX/XviD with AC3 to DVD with AC3
By Baldrick in forum User guidesReplies: 52Last Post: 21st May 2008, 19:22 -
Sync issues after converting AVI (DivX 5/AC3) to MPEG2/AC3
By Greycat in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 25th Mar 2008, 10:24 -
H264 + AC3 + AC3 --> VOB - What is wrong with my command line?
By olik in forum ffmpegX general discussionReplies: 5Last Post: 3rd Feb 2008, 07:06