VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. I am trying to decide if I should keep some RAM I just bought, so I tryed a little experiment.

    TMPGENC settings were, Highest quality motion search, constant quality 8000 max bit rate, 704x480.
    Converted a 1hour, 35 minute video.

    With 512 M of PC 4000 ram, running at DDR520, took 10 hrs, 50 mins.

    With 256 M of PC 2700 Ram, running at DDR350, took 11hrs, 20 mins.

    That's only around 5% difference in speed, using 1/2 the amount of slower RAM.

    One other difference, with 256, FSB speed was 265, with 512 it was 260.

    Randy
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member mats.hogberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sweden (PAL)
    Search Comp PM
    As expected. Encoding is almost 100% depending on processor speed.

    /Mats
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Yep, it's nearly 100% processor based. The true difference you experienced is actually just plain old XP. You need a minimum of 512 MB to do anything useful. It will run with 256 MB, but really 512 is much better.
    To Be, Or, Not To Be, That, Is The Gazorgan Plan
    Quote Quote  
  4. on my old xp1700 256mb ram i stuck an extra 512mb ram in barely noticed the difference

    when i got my new xp2600pc 512mbram it appears to do video editing tasks a fair bit quicker i think the new xvid codec has something to do with it also(in my case)
    Quote Quote  
  5. Originally Posted by Gazorgan
    Yep, it's nearly 100% processor based. The true difference you experienced is actually just plain old XP. You need a minimum of 512 MB to do anything useful. It will run with 256 MB, but really 512 is much better.
    Curious about this statement. I am running xp pro, and it seems to work fine with one 256 mb stick of RAM. Right now, I am leaning towards returning my 512mb of PC4000, and just using my cheap stick of 256. So far, I have not seen any problems, or real performance hits in the things I am doing at home.

    BTW, I have seen people recommend buying 1g of ram for heavy video rendering. Glad I did not go that route.

    Randy
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I have 512 MB or RAM at home (W2K, less of a RAM hog) and I routinely run out of RAM. It's not from encoding, it's from doing other things. 256 would definately bog down a LOT!!! For an 'average' user they can get buy on 256 Mb, just don't have 3 torrents open, be editing video, and 3 webpages up....

    1 GB is probably overkill for 99.9% of users. The remaining 0.1% know what they are doing and have the 1 or 2 GB :P
    To Be, Or, Not To Be, That, Is The Gazorgan Plan
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!