After putting it off for many months, I decided to start consolidating some svcd's that I've made to dvd just to save space. I wanted to maximize time-per-disc, so I ripped the mpg from the svcd and then reencoded to half-d1 in tmpgenc. My original file (the rip from the svcd) is 813Mb, and the video-stream-only reencode is 705Mb! The Tmpgenc project wizard (which I didn't use for the final product) says that half-d1 with mp2 audio can be used to put 495 minutes onto a dvd, but I don't see that happening with just over 100 megs of space saved by reencoding to half-d1 - and that's an elementary stream that doesn't include audio! I'm sure that I'm missing something obvious here, but I'm stumped. Shouldn't going from d1 to half-d1 save me a *lot* more space than this?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
Fight spammers ghetto kung-fu style! Join the Unsolicited Commandos! or the Spam Vampires!
-
Going from dvd to 1/2 dvd doesnt automatically save you space,its the bitrate that you can use with 1/2 dvd that drops the file size so a bitrate of around 3000kbps looks better on 1/2 dvd than on dvd,498mins to fit on a dvd is just a rough estimate that pertains more to vcd standards,its the file size that counts in making a dvd which is produced by what bitrate you use.I save more space by using a bitrate of 3000kbps and using tmpgenc cq encode at 80.
-
Originally Posted by johns0
(a momentary pause whilst I do a forum search. I'm always yelling at people for not doing research, I guess I should dig a little myself...)
Hmm... I encoded at average 2k/max 8k/min 0, and I'm seeing suggestions of max 3.5k max/1k min. I think I need to try that out and compare. I really wish I could understand the whole resolution / length / bitrate correlation to filesize. It takes me forever to grasp any math that's harder than x+y=z.
Grr...Fight spammers ghetto kung-fu style! Join the Unsolicited Commandos! or the Spam Vampires! -
Whether you encode at 1/2D1 or D1 the resolution does not effect file size.
The average bitrate you use dtermines files size,not resolution. D1 is 720x480 and 1/1D1 is 352x480. In theory using 1/2D1 allows you to use a lower average bitrate because there are many less pixels to encode. The fewer the pixels the more bits per pixel. But bitrate as it gets lower has more to do with artifacts then resolution. Since your converting SVCD(480x480) going to D1 may not look visibly better,only your eyes can answer that question. -
Originally Posted by haloblackFight spammers ghetto kung-fu style! Join the Unsolicited Commandos! or the Spam Vampires!
-
Liste to what everyone is saying. It is the bitrate and playing time that affect filesize. However, if using some form of variable bitrate encoding (which it appears you are) then it is the AVERAGE bitrate that is improtant in terms of filesize. Max and min values only affect quality and bitrate distribution.
Using TmpGenc, the only way to use VBR and ensure a specific Average bitrate (and hence filesize) is to use 2-pass VBR. where you can set MAX, MIN and AVERAGE values for the encoder to use. If you use CQ mode or any of the other VBR methods offered by tmpgenc you cannot guarantee the final filesize as you cannot specify the Average bitrate.
Hope this helps.
Similar Threads
-
VCD vs Half-D1 vs Low bitrate full-D1
By nharikrishna in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 44Last Post: 6th Feb 2011, 22:50 -
512x384 to DVD? Full D1 or Half D1?
By rayden54 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 19Last Post: 8th Sep 2009, 23:44 -
Gotsent Sound Problem! 1st Half 2-Channel 2nd Half 5.1?!?
By Jerec in forum Video ConversionReplies: 1Last Post: 7th Aug 2008, 13:16 -
How Do I Split screen Half Rolling Credits-Half Video in Vegas
By Ray & Paula in forum EditingReplies: 1Last Post: 7th Apr 2008, 08:35 -
Full D1 menu and half-D1 video in DVDA 4
By itsme1 in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 3Last Post: 13th Jul 2007, 10:00