VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. Hi.
    About the "motion search precision" in TMPGEncīs MPEG-settings/Video.

    I have read different recommendations for it, due to a "strange" translation in the program??

    Any news on this?

    What is your experience for the different options, in the matter of quality compared to speed?
    Is there really big changes here?

    Lowes quality (very fast)
    Low quality (fast)
    Normal
    High quality (slow)
    Highest quality (very slow)
    Motion estimate search (fast)

    Thanks

    Stefan
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member teegee420's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Southern California
    Search Comp PM
    I keep mine on "Normal" and see no difference from "High Quality", only a faster encode time, nothing dramatic though.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Take a short clip from one of your source avi's - run a series of encoding tests with all other settings held same - and compare your processing times for the various motion precision search settings...
    Always check helpfiles/instructions before leaping...
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member mats.hogberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sweden (PAL)
    Search Comp PM
    I use "High quality" - just on recommendation here. From what I've read (and in part experienced) the time difference between High and Highest is dramatic, whereas the quailty difference is unnoticable.

    /Mats
    Quote Quote  
  5. depends on source. if the source is very good, like DVD video then I use Motion Search the fastest setting and get good results. with grainier source like downloaded DivX I use High.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member FulciLives's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA in the USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by mats.hogberg
    I use "High quality" - just on recommendation here. From what I've read (and in part experienced) the time difference between High and Highest is dramatic, whereas the quailty difference is unnoticable.

    /Mats
    Bingo same here.

    Although as of late I've switched mostly to using CINEMA CRAFT ENCODER since the results appear to me to be just as good as TMPGEnc but a HELL of a lot faster.

    It also helps that CCE works in the YUV/YUY2 colorspace ... if you capture using an MJPEG codec you never have to convert to RGB (ala TMPGEnc) so there is less chance of "screwing" things up such as your luminance levels etc.

    - John "FulciLives" Coleman
    "The eyes are the first thing that you have to destroy ... because they have seen too many bad things" - Lucio Fulci
    EXPLORE THE FILMS OF LUCIO FULCI - THE MAESTRO OF GORE
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I use normal. IMO I can't see any difference using higher quality settings.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Orthanc.

    You don't give any info on what you are trying to achieve or your source video. I use a high bitrate of 8000 - 8500 kbs and "motion search." Occasionally I use "normal" - I have found on action scenes, that if I pause or step my DVD and zoom in, I can see a bit of differnce by using normal (beyond "normal", I see no difference) - I don't usually watch my DVD's in this manner, so I generally go with "motion search". Looking at your "profile", you are going to have rather slow encodes anyway so as rcb suggested:

    Take a short clip from one of your source avi's - run a series of encoding tests with all other settings held same - and compare your processing times for the various motion precision search settings...
    ... and I would add, compare the quality of your tests.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!