Hi, I have a PIV 1900 ghz, and am using three different encoders: CCE SP 2.61, LSX 3.5 and TMPGenc 2.0
My test file is 135 seconds.
Using 2pass VBR 6000 - 8000.
LSX 3.5 takes 25 minutes.
CCE SP takes 9 minutes (!!!)
TMPGENC takes 62 minutes (checking SSE-2 box)
Why do I get these so different results on the same machine????
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
-
Well every program has different ways of encoding.
On that 135 second file, what is the codec? and format size?
So I can compare it to my dual PIII 1 GZ.
I only use LSX 3.5 (I mean I don't have any other encoder installed), and would like to do some comparisons. -
Hmm... over 1 hour to encode 2 minutes with TMPGenc... that just doesn't sound right. That means 30x encoding.
On my Athlon, in 2pass vbr, I get around 11x encoding time with TMPGEnc. -
My codec is Matrox RT2000 AVI.
It really is too much - 28:1 is not the encoding time I expected from a SSE-2 optimized program.
Any clue from other users on how to fix it? -
Have u tried version 2.0?
if so maybe try the other versions, because i can encode faster than that on P3 clocked @ 975 -
Indeed, I am using 2.0 release, and have checked SSE-2 box...
Could anybody tell me if there are any chances that Tmpgenc is not "reading" correctly my setup?
Similar Threads
-
Load time differences for MPG2 vs MPG4
By icfriend in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 1Last Post: 7th Mar 2011, 09:07 -
AMD's Zacate APU will be incredible
By deadrats in forum ComputerReplies: 3Last Post: 14th Nov 2010, 18:44 -
The U2 3D IMAX movie is incredible!
By Epicurus8a in forum Off topicReplies: 2Last Post: 4th Feb 2008, 16:29 -
3.4 Pentium 4 or 935 Pentium D?
By DarrellS in forum ComputerReplies: 6Last Post: 11th Jan 2008, 23:58 -
The Incredible Disappearing Warranty Receipt!
By CobraPilot in forum ComputerReplies: 10Last Post: 27th Oct 2007, 00:12