VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. Hello all,

    I keep reading about how much faster MainConcept 1.4 is compared
    to TMPGEnc, but I am not seeing much speed improvement.

    My system:
    - WinXP Pro SP1
    - 512MB RAM
    - 2.4GHz Pentium 4
    - 200GB disk

    I ran a few tests with a 1 min clip, 10 min clip, and 1 hour 46 min clip, all DV clips captured from Canopus ADVC-100.

    I do not see anything close to "near real-time" encoding with MC1.4.
    Here is what I am seeing in terms of encoding speeds, with both
    MC1.4 and TMPGEncPlus 2.511: [TMPGEnc encoded with "high quality(slow)" setting]

    1 min clip - CBR encode to elemental streams (m2v, wav)
    MC1.4: 4 min 10 sec (not even close to "real-time")
    TMPGEnc: 7 min 02 sec
    -- Here MC is about 2x TMPGEnc speed

    1 min clip - 2 Pass VBR to elemental streams (m2v, wav)
    MC1.4: 7 min 32 sec
    TMPGEnc: 10 min 23 sec
    -- Here MC is about 1.4x TMPGEnc speed - big deal

    10 min clip - 2 Pass VBR to elemental streams (m2v, wav)
    MC1.4: 1 hour 8 min 37 sec
    TMPGEnc: 1 hour 29 min 25 sec
    -- Here MC is about 1.3x TMPGEnc speed - big deal

    I started encoding the 1hr 46min clip with MC1.4 in 2 PassVBR mode
    and it took about 6 hours to complete the first pass -- I did not let it
    complete -- but this means it would take ~12 hours to enode the
    whole thing! This would be SLOWER than TMPGEnc and TMPGEnc usually
    encodes this kind of file for me in 2 Pass VBR mode in about 9 hours
    total.

    So, my question is:

    Why do I see such "slow" MC Encoder performance? In CBR mode it
    looks like MC is about twice as fast, but in 2 Pass VBR mode MC does not
    appear to be much faster than TMPGEnc (and actually may be slower).
    Is this to be expected or do I have some wrong MC settings enabled?

    Thanks for your help.
    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  2. Another thing -- MainConcept is much faster on my laptop (which has
    a slower CPU!) than on my desktop with the faster CPU. I don't understand this...

    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  3. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    your results are way off ... but without knowing more facts , can't tell you why ...

    looks like some conversion or something is happening -- or a lot of noise reduction or some codec reading issue
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  4. your results are way off ... but without knowing more facts , can't tell you why ...
    What would you like to know? This is really strange -- MC1.4 is really
    fast on my laptop -- I installed the Panasonic DV codec. My desktop
    is using the MainConcept DV codec. Think I should install the Panasonic
    DV codec on my desktop? (desktop is the one showing poor encoding
    performance). Laptop CBR encode is about real-time.

    I am totally stumped. Are there any obvious settings for me to check?
    In both cases I use the default settings of "Search Method=5"
    and "Search Range=15" and do not enable NoiseReduction.

    Also in the main MC window, when I load a clip, sometimes it says "DirectShow Import" and other times "AVI Import". Why is this?


    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  5. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    its switching between microsoft and Mc dv codec ..

    use graphedit and see which one is being used ...

    you can set priorities in mc options ... try to turn off one or the other avi readers ..
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  6. Do you think this is the root of the problem?

    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  7. looks like some conversion or something is happening
    What kind of conversion might be happening? Sorry for all the questions
    but I really wanna figure this one out.

    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  8. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    you said in a pm that your system takes a long time to boot and such - you may want to check that out first ...

    in mc -- options -> import modules

    turn off directshow import , turn off dv import (type1)

    try that , then try only direct show on
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  9. Thanks, I will clean the registry and the startup folder, and then
    tweak the module settings tonight.

    stay tuned for results -- thanks for your help

    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  10. Update: I discovered that my hard drive was BADLY fragmented. I ran Windows Disk Defragmenter and unfortunately it could not totally defrag the drive because I still have a large AVI (25GB) that I need to convert to MPEG. This one is fragmented into literally hundreds of pieces. The 60 second clip I was encoding with MC1.4 is not fragmented but I am hoping that this general fragmentation issue is the source of my problem. Once I finish with this AVI I will convert to MPEG with TMPGEnc, delete the AVI and then defrag again. Do you think this will fix my "slow MC1.4" problem?"

    Also, do you think this fragmentation issue is the source of the long boot-time? (WinXP Pro window is shown for about a minute).

    Thanks,
    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  11. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    fragmentation shouldn't slow up the boot that much -- being that windows was prob. installed on a unfrag'd drive and the files dont move . though a badly frag'd swap file or a corrupted MFT table can slow things down a lot .. there is also a hidden dir in winxp which preloads parts of programs that are used a lot -- this can get mucked up ... slow boot ussually (im no expert) is result of unfound devices and drivers and drive problems in general ..

    i do know that the best defrag ive used (and use) is O&O defrag ..
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  12. also after doing the defrag i encoded the 60 sec DV clip with MC1.4 in CBR mode and it still took about 3 minutes to encode. so some problem still exists somewhere. nobody else has ever seen this problem?

    this has me stumped.

    thanks for the defrag tip - i will try out the O&O product - they have
    a 30 day trial.

    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member racer-x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    3rd Rock from the Sun
    Search Comp PM
    I'd say it's time to reinstall XP or restore from a previously made good image. I'm running XP pro (no SP) with an AMD XP1700 and easily encode default CBR settings in real time.
    Got my retirement plans all set. Looks like I only have to work another 5 years after I die........
    Quote Quote  
  14. Ugh, i've done that twice already within a period of a month to solve some other problems....

    if that's what it takes, i'll need to seriously consider it. Easy to do, just takes some time.

    thanks,
    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  15. Here's another piece of info that may help solve this:

    On my laptop where MC runs fast as expected, when you launch MC1.4, the splash screen is displayed for maybe one second and then the MC1.4 GUI is displayed.

    On my desktop where MC performance is very slow, the splashscreen is displayed for about 3 seconds before the GUI is displayed.

    Weird. Does this point to the fragmentation issue?

    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  16. Member racer-x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    3rd Rock from the Sun
    Search Comp PM
    You may have something you don't know about that's running in the background sucking up your system resources.
    Got my retirement plans all set. Looks like I only have to work another 5 years after I die........
    Quote Quote  
  17. What's the simplest way to identify this system resource sucker? Use the Task Manager? When I do this I don't see anything using CPU cycles.

    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  18. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    no disrespect ... but sorting something like this out long distance and blind , is very difficult ... and when it comes to it .. a re-install is the shortest route to go (unless you also have a hardware isssue)
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  19. Yeah I understand, no disrespect taken. I will try a WinXP Repair first to see if that fixes things. If not, I will consider a full XP reinstall without a disk wipe.

    thanks,
    vcddude
    Quote Quote  
  20. I'm a Super Moderator johns0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    canada
    Search Comp PM
    i recently had to remove intel application accelerator from a p4 and got back from pio to udma 5,dont know if this will help
    Quote Quote  
  21. Hello all,

    After trying several things, I discovered that XP in general was having
    serious performance problems, so it wasn't just an MC1.4 issue.

    So, after defragging, cleaning the registry, and cleaning the startup folder, I did a WinXP Repair Reinstallation. This fixed the problem! Wasn't too painful (took about 45 minutes) and now everything runs as expected.

    Thanks for everyone's help!
    vcddude
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!