An interesting link
http://audio.ciara.us/test/64test/results.html
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
An interesting study, though with the release of progressively cheaper and larger capacity flash memory storage media (e.g., for MP3 players), it begs the question as to whether encoding at 64 kbit/s in any codec is worthwhile unless for a particular purpose (e.g., for spoken word radio broadcasts).
Regards.Michael Tam
w: Morsels of Evidence -
It's clear that QuickTime AAC performs very poor at 64kbit/s.
On the same site you can find test results on 128kbit/s where QT comes out as the best!?
A bit strange, so ther must be a reason for this.
Similar Threads
-
Terminator on DVD & Bluray, anyone own both for an audio comparison ?
By Noahtuck in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 19Last Post: 3rd Apr 2015, 15:28 -
MSU MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 2011 Video Codec Comparison - CALL FOR CODECS
By DmitriyK in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 1Last Post: 28th Jan 2011, 15:27 -
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 video codecs comparison
By DmitriyK in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 6Last Post: 30th Jun 2010, 06:54 -
Fourth Annual MSU H.264 Video Codecs Comparison
By DmitriyV in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 0Last Post: 25th Jan 2008, 08:39 -
Lossless Audio Codec Comparison '07
By Tab in forum AudioReplies: 8Last Post: 3rd Jul 2007, 01:08