I've read many people make the point in here to use their DVD burner exclusively for DVD burning and not use it for CD burning or DVD reading or ripping, because these operations cause wear and tear on drive components, and why not do them on much cheaper to replace DVD-ROM and CD-RW drives. While this makes sense logically, I can't help but wonder how many DVD-ROM and CD-RW drives die after 2-3 years of normal use before they were upgraded to faster drives anyway? I have a Sony 16X DVD-ROM and a Sony 32X CD-RW, both are around 2 years old, and work as well as the day that I bought them new. What makes more sense is to use discreet drives for speed, as DVD-ROMs and CD-RWs perform their functions faster than a DVD burner.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
-
That's a good point... after 2-3 years of normal use, we'll all think the DVD burners we have today are so far behind technology, we'll be hoping they fail to give us a reason to upgrade to the new 48X DVD burner! Well, at least I hope mine lasts long enough...
2 DVD, or not 2 DVD, that is the question.
Similar Threads
-
Why do scifi bad guys never have security cameras and wear armor?
By yoda313 in forum Off topicReplies: 6Last Post: 10th Apr 2011, 14:44 -
What do you wear on your head?
By johns0 in forum PollsReplies: 15Last Post: 11th Feb 2010, 19:12 -
san jose cops to wear head cameras
By deadrats in forum Off topicReplies: 1Last Post: 20th Dec 2009, 08:22 -
Help Me Out by voting for my design so you can wear a new t-shirt!
By ir0n_ma1den in forum Off topicReplies: 0Last Post: 11th Jun 2008, 13:48 -
IDE DVD Burner VS SATA DVD Burner
By mn072065 in forum DVD & Blu-ray WritersReplies: 13Last Post: 13th Nov 2007, 20:15