Just curious, does the forum have an upper limit for the number of posts a thread can contain?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
-
-
guess we'll find out sometime
-
Yes....we can only post a total of 4 294 967 295 posts in this forum...
-
But if you are worried about that I could change the max post limit to
18 446 744 073 709 551 614 -
Yes, we really areOriginally Posted by Baldrick
Could you? Please!!!Originally Posted by Baldrick
We really need it (for the association thread, of course.... screw all that DVD burning non-sense)
-
And all this time I didn't think he had a sense of humor...Originally Posted by Baldrick
-
just imagine this
DVDRHelp will be the top result of every Google search as most words will be contained in the thread

there is another word association thread I've seen with 36000+ replies so that may take some beating
anyone know of longer threads? -
You mean there aren't any 'DVD+R kicks DVD-R square in the ass!' format war threads in the 5-digit range?!Originally Posted by MackemX
-
- + + = + + - +
* 2
There's not much to do but then I can't do much anyway. -
The tread was acting up the other day. The forum page listed that there was 84 pages, but if you clicked on 84, it said that no page existed. in fact we were still on 83, and had about 3 more posts to go before we moved on to page 84. Kinda strange.
-
It happens sometime...but it will be fixed when I run my special syncall forums script.Originally Posted by tgpo
Similar Threads
-
Word Association
By MackemX in forum Off topicReplies: 16525Last Post: 15th Dec 2025, 14:09 -
An M2TS file went thru TSRemux and has come without any file association
By mahogany in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 2nd May 2010, 09:04 -
Microsoft Word
By didikai in forum Off topicReplies: 9Last Post: 11th Apr 2009, 22:40 -
Ask the Blu-ray Disc Association
By NICEBUD in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 2Last Post: 5th Feb 2008, 07:18 -
File Association hassle factor
By ahhaa in forum ComputerReplies: 2Last Post: 26th Aug 2007, 22:25




Quote
