Just wondering, is the video information in a Divx file always physically stored and encoded on a frame by frame basis (whether the frames are progressive or interlaced doesn't matter, I guess)....or can Divx be field-based.
I'm really trying to understand this. It seems that there is no direct connection between the type of frames (progressive or interlaced) and the "physical" storage of the information in the video file (field-based or frame-based). After all, one can always split progressive frames and store them as fields, and one can always merge interlaced fields and store them as frames. Doing the former would be fine, I think, but doing the latter would lead to an inefficient encode, right?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
DivX doesn't support Interlacing, it's all progressive.
24 fps (FILM from DVD) is as efficient as it gets.To Be, Or, Not To Be, That, Is The Gazorgan Plan -
So, if it's all progressive, why does TMPGEnc waste so much time "judging field order" when I open my DivX Avi in using the wizard?
Similar Threads
-
How to add ".ass" subtitles to a ..."h264" file?
By Tatsubon in forum SubtitleReplies: 3Last Post: 20th Apr 2012, 18:35 -
Set "Output filename" As Default Global "File/segment title" In MkvMerge?
By LouieChuckyMerry in forum Video ConversionReplies: 0Last Post: 9th Jul 2011, 01:52 -
Subtitling software that uses hotkey-based/"punch-in" timing method?
By wohdin in forum SubtitleReplies: 0Last Post: 12th Jun 2011, 13:34 -
Staxrip: "Constant Quality" vs. "Exact File Size"
By FallenAngelII in forum Video ConversionReplies: 1Last Post: 9th Aug 2007, 17:40 -
Why do I have 2 files? "Movie Clip" and "M2V File"
By tygger in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 22nd Jun 2007, 21:55