Basically in the process of encoding, programs like TMPGEnc or Main Concept are resizing the video and throwing away or cropping frames and pieces of the original video to get it trimmed down to whatever spec. you want.
My question is basically this, Do you lose more quailty during the process when encoding an original which has much more resultion than the end product will have. Or if your original source is much closer to the final source, is that better?
For instance, is quailty lost when encoding something that is 1200x960 to 480x480 verus something that is 640x480 to 480x480, or is the difference nil? Something tells me if the encoder works harder throwing away more info, wouldnt that lead to more quality loss than if the original source was closer in the first place?
tygrus
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
the quality should be better using the higher resolution source. as there are more samples (pixels) to choose from when creating the resized frame, you get a more accurate representation of the original, and a smoother image. this means going from film resolution to DVD resolution creates a nice even picture which doesn't change much from frame to frame, meaning low noise, which means less work for the encoder and less visible artifacts.
-
MPEG2 encoding does not work by cropping frames, throwing away frames, resizing, or anything remotely like that.
It performs a 2 dimensional frequency transform on the pictures and...
Sometimes discards higher frequency components (detail)
Sometimes quantizes components to numbers with less precision
Arranges coefficients into same value groups so that multiple occurences
of the same number aren't stored.
Sometimes stores only the differences between one frame and the
next to save space
Sometimes notices when a part of the picture has moved but not
changed and stores only the motion vector.
In general, the more data you start with the better. If a picture can be
represented at 720 x 480 without loss, starting with a larger picture
cannot improve it but will not degrade it either except for the slight
loss in resampling it to 720 x 480.
A noisy source will encode better if oversampled.
Similar Threads
-
Re-Encode with Minimal Quality Loss
By Bruno AUgusto in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 18th Mar 2012, 17:26 -
Can't get good quality x264 encode
By silverwolf0 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 11Last Post: 4th Aug 2011, 21:45 -
How do I encode VBR to CBR without losing quality?
By rocky12 in forum AudioReplies: 7Last Post: 1st Oct 2008, 11:59 -
Subtitle question for PS3 owners and experts....
By siratfus in forum SubtitleReplies: 1Last Post: 25th Jul 2008, 23:27 -
This Is A Loaded Question For You Video/Audio Experts Out There...
By pmolson in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 2Last Post: 20th May 2007, 13:32