Thank You Stone for helping me, I know and I tell you, I tried several encodes with x264 as software without hardware and it takes more than 24hours, If I encode with hardware mode it takes almost 1 hour and the video quality result on my tv is excelent just for that I choose the hardware mode and for that I use NVenc, a week ago my graphic card 710 GT no works anymore and I currently use the IGPU from Intel i3 7100 the QSV mode that people here says to me this QSV is better than that card
I have the posibility to buy an GT 1030 in the spect says CUDA 384, but I still donīt know if that card 1030 still better than QSV from i3 7100 or QSV still better than 1030 ?
If you donīt understand me feel free to tell me and I will to tray explain more detailed
Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays! or rip iTunes movies!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 35 of 35
Thread
-
-
-
new NVDEC and NVENC codec support table: https://developer.nvidia.com/video-encode-and-decode-gpu-support-matrix-new
-
Even on my 8C/16T AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, doing a feature film through x264 on the default settings (Medium preset at CRF 20) takes about 60-90 minutes depending on the content. With a lot of things to compress, this is very time-consuming.
I did a bunch of testing to find what looked acceptable to me. I settled for NVENC H265 through VidCoder. It may not look as good as the default x264 settings, but it saves time and looks good enough for my needs. I settled for Constant Quality 24. You can see where there is some softness but it's not really noticeable most of the time. At Constant Quality 26, I got smaller file sizes but I could see where the compression was causing artifacts.
The nice thing is that these files are nice and compact. My Roku Ultra and Xbox One S can both Direct Stream these through Plex without any transcoding. I don't really even buy Blu-rays anymore, favoring Vudu these days. I just took a step back and asked if it was really worth my time spending literally months compressing things through x264 and I just don't think it's really worth it considering how much faster NVENC or QSV are. The nice thing about Intel Quick Sync is you can get a laptop with an i3 or something and compress stuff in a fraction of the time versus x264 or x265.
Good enough
By the way, I'd say that QSV on the newest Intel CPUs is going to be better than Pascal or older NVIDIA cards but I think the NVIDIA Turing cards are supposed to be best for GPU encoding.Last edited by stonesfan187; 16th Oct 2020 at 17:03.
-
Similar Threads
-
X264 vs Intel QSV on Ubuntu Linux
By sophisticles in forum Video ConversionReplies: 11Last Post: 6th May 2021, 22:21 -
About Handbrake, Intel QSV and nvidia NVenc
By BlurayHD in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 9th Feb 2020, 04:34 -
nVidia CUDA no good for Prores 422 decoding?
By KiDy in forum ComputerReplies: 3Last Post: 15th Oct 2018, 11:46 -
NVIDIA CUDA Potplayer
By jo2dan in forum Software PlayingReplies: 1Last Post: 16th Feb 2017, 23:59 -
NVIDIA CUDA is no more....
By sharkbite in forum Video ConversionReplies: 49Last Post: 28th May 2016, 19:57