Is this interlacing artifacts? (a still captured from a MP4 video file)
If so, using Handbrake to remove those lines made video a little blurry.
Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays! or rip iTunes movies!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Thread
-
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence -Carl Sagan
-
It looks to be originally interlaced with separate fields - but it has been resized (at least in the screenshot), thus making it much more difficult to treat
There are special rules and techniques for resizing interlaced content , which were not followed
Is that a 1:1 screenshot of the original video ? or did you resize it? or if there is any doubt, post a sample of the original video -
It was a frame grab from MPCHC.
https://forum.videohelp.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=24283&stc=1&d=1395880343
Here is a YouTube link to the full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMAQ3rIcSgs The interlacing does not show up on the youtube copy. I had the original sent to me through dropbox which has the problem.Last edited by TreeTops; 26th Mar 2014 at 18:42.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence -Carl Sagan -
maybe try grabbing it with this
http://www.afterdawn.com/software/audio_video/online_video_recorders/free_youtube_download.cfm -
Yes original has interlaced content, but encoded with progressive settings
It's already blurry / poor condition to begin with.
You can try using higher bitrate in handbrake and/or better deinterlacers in other programs
The youtube version has been deinterlaced (youtube can apply deinterlace), but only single rate - so it's missing 1/2 the motion samples (motion is not as smooth). I think the nightly handbrake builds have the option to bob deinterlace (so you don't drop 1/2 the frames). YT version has also other processing done to it (it's zoomed in more) probably the result of stabilization
There is strong evidence that the MP4 version you uploaded isn't the "real" original. There are details and textures missing that present are in the YT version. Also your version has compression artifacts that the YT version doesn'tLast edited by poisondeathray; 26th Mar 2014 at 19:20.
-
Yes to all 3 questions above.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence -Carl Sagan -
But there is no way that MP4 you uploaded can be the "original". I think there is some misunderstanding
Quality doesn't "increase" when YT re-encodes it. If anything it should look worse on YT, at least worse than your version if it was the "original"
Here are the same frames, and the YT version is zoomed in more ; but compare out the ground textures, the bleachers in the background. Your version has been deinterlaced for this, but that doesn't explain the missing details and compression artifacts -
You sure could be correct about it not being the original. I was told by the lady that put in drop box for me that it was the original but who knows, maybe her husband ran it through a video editor first. I could ask what kind of camera they used. Would that help?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence -Carl Sagan
Similar Threads
-
Record without interlacing.
By crissrudd4554 in forum CapturingReplies: 61Last Post: 9th Oct 2013, 23:01 -
Interlacing Questions
By maikii in forum EditingReplies: 10Last Post: 26th May 2013, 18:53 -
De-interlacing problem?
By fredo2010 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 17Last Post: 27th Oct 2010, 15:48 -
interlacing issue
By mathmax in forum RestorationReplies: 2Last Post: 2nd Jul 2010, 07:28 -
De-interlacing 1080i50
By 2stepsteve in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 8Last Post: 10th Jun 2010, 11:28