[InpaintDelogo] unusual logo - DVB-T HD sample

[maudit]

Hi all, hi Voodoo, it's me again with new questions..

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bkyd5pkxe2d1gwj/AACAaClgqANTui7z7_Jvjx_Ga?dl=0

The link contain a folder with:
- the mask with ebmp file
- the script
- original TS>MKV DVB capture file 10min sample
- a preview of the result - fast encoded - not full quality.

First of all, for some reasons this time the process has taken not so much, anyway the cpu usage it was always like other times, at 20-25%.
So, the question 1: are there some ways to increase the cpu load?

Talking about the logo now, it's a weird and unusual unique logo, without going OT.. you can imagine why there is an UK flag..
anyway the result is not so bad as I imagined, well it is not perfect but acceptable.
now, question 2: do you think the logo can be removed better than that?


About the first frames where the logo is not impressed yet, I think I have to trim/split the video in two parts, NOLOGO and LOGO,
and then apply the InpaintDelogo last line, using the same ebmp, only for the LOGO part, then I join them back..
Is it correct?

I'm not sure how to do it..
for example:

NOLOGO=Trim(0,27).crop(10, 8, -6, -2)
LOGO=Trim(28,0).crop(10, 8, -6, -2)

LOGO=LOGO.InpaintDelogo(mask="C:\PATH\mask.bmp", Loc="1588,862,-72,-46", Analyze=3, Mode="Both")

FINAL=NOLOGO++LOGO

Return FINAL.bbmod(4,4,3,3,128,8)

#Prefetch(7)

that seems it could work, except for the top right HD written that appear for 1 frame at frame n°28,
question 3: can I get rid of it?
question 4: can the script be done in a more efficient way? what is a better syntax?

[VoodooFX]

First of all, for some reasons this time it taken not so much time, anyway the cpu usage it was always like other times, at 20-25%.
So, the question 1: are there some ways to increase the cpu load?

Question is when you'll do those benchmarks I mentioned in previous thread?
There is no magical solution to things if you are not interested in solving them.

Talking about the logo now, it's a weird and unusual unique logo
...
now, question 2: do you think the logo can be removed better than that?

First, your "Dim Ven - delogo - preview - fast encode.mkv" encode is out of sync with original file.
I tried "FFVideoSource" and it sometimes shows me random frames, maybe this filter is not frame accurate, so use accurate one, that is important.

Increase "oTune" mask by one pixel - "oTinflate=1".
Use "IntSpd=4", that reduces "Interp" artifacts, it's very slow. [to enable "4" get InpaintDelogo from here: https://github.com/Purfview/InpaintDelogo/tree/temp ]

1) With logo [Frame 3518]:
2) Pure deblend [no other effects] [enable with Interp=0, dPP=0]:
3) Interp artifact [Interp=2, IntSpd=1] [that's defaults]:
4) Interp artifact gone [Interp=2, IntSpd=4]:

From pure deblend you can see that there is almost no logo leftovers, if such is whole video then Interp can be disabled or reduced to Interp=1.



Here are more visible leftovers [frame 3651]:

1) Pure deblend [Interp=0, dPP=0]
2) Interp=2, dPP 0
3) Interp=0, dPP=3
4) Interp=2, dPP=3 [defaults]



Choice is yours what artifacts you prefer.

I'm not sure how to do it..

v=LWLibAvVideoSource("D:\Dim Ven - cut - sample.mkv").AssumeFPS(25).crop(10, 8, -6, -2)
a=v.Trim(0,25)
b=v.Trim(26,26)
c=v.Trim(27,0)
o1=b.InpaintDelogo(mask="D:\mask.bmp", Loc="1588,862,-72,-46", Mode="Inpaint")
o2=c.InpaintDelogo(mask="D:\mask.bmp", Loc="1588,862,-72,-46", Analyze=3, Mode="Both")

a++o1++o2

[maudit]

Question is when you'll do those benchmarks I mentioned in previous thread?
There is no magical solution to things if you are not interested in solving them.

I tried AVSMeter3090 with a script, but I got no results, something went wrong and I don't know what is it.
nevermind...


about the logo
"oTinflate=1" or 2 works reducing the big red dot visibility,
"IntSpd=4 reduces a little bit some flag artifacts but nothing special.
I don't know why... doesn't matter... i give up..
this is too much complicated.

thx anyway

[VoodooFX]

I tried AVSMeter3090 with a script, but I got no results, something went wrong and I don't know what is it.

What it wrote?

[maudit]

What it wrote?

something like the process was too short too get a result, even if it run the whole script creating mask.
anyway using LWLibAvVideoSource instead of FFVideoSource, at least during the use AVSMeter, the cpu was at 100%.
next time i try to use it when using inpaint.

[VoodooFX]

something like the process was too short too get a result, even if it run the whole script creating mask.

I wrote that you can't use AvsMeter on that.
Only this with AvsMeter:

LWLibAvVideoSource("D:\first 10 min sample.mkv")

The scripts below you measure with a timer [in phone ect], using AvsPmod:
[measure ebmp masks creation using "first 10 min sample.mkv" and "mask.bmp" from that thread]

LWLibAvVideoSource("D:\first 10 min sample.mkv")
Crop(58, 0, -58, -2)
InpaintDelogo( mask="D:\mask.bmp", Loc="1576,858,-16,-64", Mode="Deblend", Analyze=2 )

LWLibAvVideoSource("D:\first 10 min sample.mkv")
Crop(58, 0, -58, -2)
InpaintDelogo( mask="D:\mask.bmp", Loc="1576,858,-16,-64", Mode="Deblend", Analyze=3 )

next time i try to use it when using inpaint.

That is not important at all.