VideoHelp Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread
  1. I know that each case is different and that it is a question of looking for the best option, but in general terms which is better for classic anime or for blurays with a lot or little grain. ?

    the point is to retain as much quality as possible.

    which is the michael jordan or muhamad ali of the denoiser.

    for you my friend what it the best denoiser EVER-.

    TemporalDegrain()
    MCTemporalDenoise()
    FluxSmoothST()
    SMDegrain()
    MDegrain2()

    I dont like FFT3DFilter or dfttest too much detail is lost...

    I run several tests and the truth is that the difference is minimal, or maybe I don't have the visual ability to determine which one better,
    In general terms which is better, for example for classic anime, blurays with a lot or little grain etc., based on your experience.

    thanks so much
    Quote Quote  
  2. Dinosaur Supervisor KarMa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    US
    Search Comp PM
    I personally use this most of the time.

    Code:
    QTGMC(InputType=1, Preset="slow") #can also use "fast" or "medium"for less noise removal and faster speeds with possibly less quality denoising
    QTGMC is mostly used for deinterlacing content but by using "inputtype=1" you tell QTGMC that the content is already progressive. I use it when encoding old film content with a lot of grain noise, and so QTGMC tends to tame the grain in a more aesthetically pleasing manner (to me). And so helps x264 keep the file size down a bit in CRF mode. QTGMC is kind of slow as it's a single threaded thing, and so it's usually the bottleneck. QTGMC also has a EZDenoise function but I never used it.

    Some additional reading
    https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/358043-A-comparison-of-AVIsynth-denoise-filters
    http://avisynth.nl/index.php/QTGMC
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Memphis TN, US
    Search PM
    There's no such thing as "best" and no single answer to your question. The most effective denoisers tend to be target-specific and dependent on problems in the source. What works well on one video won't do a damn thing on another clip.

    Try this thread: https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/358043-A-comparison-of-AVIsynth-denoise-filters?hi...emporaldegrain

    And while you're at it:

    Define "noise".
    Define "denoiser".
    - My sister Ann's brother
    Quote Quote  
  4. Originally Posted by LMotlow View Post
    There's no such thing as "best" and no single answer to your question. The most effective denoisers tend to be target-specific and dependent on problems in the source. What works well on one video won't do a damn thing on another clip.

    Try this thread: https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/358043-A-comparison-of-AVIsynth-denoise-filters?hi...emporaldegrain

    And while you're at it:

    Define "noise".
    Define "denoiser".
    I know it depends on each specific case, but the question goes more to your experience, for you which is better.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!