The other issue is some people don't have the same requirements for quality as others do. Some people expect video to be more sub-standard than it really needs to be.
I represent the opposite side of the spectrum. Anything that is technologically possible (within a reasonable budget) is what I will strive to accomplish. The TBC is an essential piece of equipment in my repetoire.
I've seen many, many, many tapes that were transferred, very often using Panasonic DVD and other recorders (or cheap capture cards or flawed capture software, etc), with quality people swearing up and down is A+ 10/10 perfect studio pro-quality ... but I consider it pure crap. Just a really amateur job.
On the other hand, I've seen people with perfect luck, they've never experienced a real error a day in their life, as it relates to video. Some of them, by some miracle, "get it right" the first time too, with zero experience, just a lot of decent guessing or accidental buying of good stuff.
And others, the simplest thing seems to implode without warning, bad luck like none other. Hardware, software, nothing works right. It's like these people are cursed.
Where somebody fits in is only left to guess when we are online and unable to share physical results (although clips and stills do help this somewhat).
However, for the most part, most people find TBC's a basic necessity for high quality video work.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 40 of 40
-
Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
Originally Posted by zanos
The fact you have "lucked out" is anecdotal and can't really offer someone else the same success.
The professionals all use TBCs. They do it for a living. Suggest to a pro that they don't need a TBC "because I had good luck without one" will get you shown to the door amidst stifled snickering -
They are also subject to distorting the signal because, for example, tapes are made of mylar, which is a plastic, and will stretch. In order for the helical head to read the magnetic imprint on the tape, it must be in intimate contact with it. That means pulling the tape tightly across the head.
MAK -
This thread needs to be a 'sticky' as the pictures posted show very clearly what a 'full frame' TBC will and will not do, and what a 'line' TBC built into the JVC VCR's does differently.
-
CaZeek -
Your TBC is probably fine.
In order to remove timebase errors, a TBC must first extract the sync information from the source and derive a sampling clock that tracks the source's timing errors. This is not a trivial task, and some TBCs are better at it than others.
The internal JVC TBCs are exceptional at removing timing instability from horizontal line to horizontal line. The DataVideo TBCs are not very good at it.
If the output of your TBC-1000 looks OK with good quality first generation tapes, then it is fine. The disturbances in your photos are the result of significant timing disturbances that exceed the frequency response and/or the magnitude limits of the sampling clock synthesizer within the TBC. -
Originally Posted by V20Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
my AG-1980 with TBC on improves moving objects at least 25% in uniformity. The previous example somebody put, need to be of the same frame to make something more clear out of it.
I compared my ag-1980 tbc on and off and detail, norm and edit modes
and compared it with my slv-r1000 with apc on.
The slv seems to produce better stills but it doesn't in my view... it just rounds everything up... the ag-1980 shows the image as is with sharp borders...
On this tape The AG produces better quality in norm then in detail mode the expressions look more human. The manual doesn't go into detail about these features. So I will need more information to tweak my tapes. -
I had a similar problem with a particular tape. It was bent at the top as in the samples. I had a conexant capture card. When I ran my VCR thru the capture card it straightened my picture out perfectly. The only thing was that I could only capture at the smallest size 320x240. When I went to convert it DVD the picture was straight but the quality of the picture was degraded because of the capture size. The card didn’t have any passthru so I had no way of capturing the video at a larger DVD size capture. So I’m still stuck at this same spot. The card straightens it out nicely but I cannot capture at DVD quality size. If the card had passthru through would run it to my DVD recorder.
Similar Threads
-
Price level on (almost) new Signvideo DR-1000 and Datavideo TBC-1000
By Northpole in forum RestorationReplies: 3Last Post: 24th Jan 2011, 12:02 -
Would a TBC-1000 from the US differ if one was bought for the UK?
By Undead Sega in forum RestorationReplies: 3Last Post: 16th Oct 2010, 18:27 -
Tbc-1000
By FreddieP in forum RestorationReplies: 7Last Post: 17th Jul 2010, 16:04 -
TBC suggestions: TBC-1000, AVT-8710, ADVC-300, TV1-TBC, or TV1-TBC-GL
By m27315 in forum RestorationReplies: 16Last Post: 24th Mar 2010, 01:36 -
DataVideo TBC-1000 and the Broadcast Flag
By robjv1 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 17th Mar 2009, 11:23