INDEX  F.A.Q.  SEARCH  LATEST POSTS     Rules  Register  Profile  Private messages  Login


Search all forums or this forum: Advanced search
TMPGEnc: 720P -> Progressive or 3:2 Pulldown?

Forum Index -> Video -> Advanced Video Conversion Printer-friendly version
Reply to topic
Author Message
akrako1
Member


Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Location: United States

Post Posted: Mar 29, 2008 10:28 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

I'm converting a 23.976fps 720p Divx file to mpeg-2 for DVD authoring. By default, TMPGEnc Plus 2.5 sets the 'encode mode' to "3:2 Pulldown when Playback". But since the original file is progressive, shouldn't I encode in 'non-interlace' mode, if I want to make a progressive DVD? My first encode I used the "3:2 Pulldown" method, but when I use TMPGEnc DVD Author 3, and flip through the frames, I see interlaced frames. For my second encode, I tried 'non-interlace' mode, and the outputted video looks great, I can see each frame is progressive, however TMPGEnc DVD Author is flagging it as needing re-encoding. So I'm guessing that the 23.976fps framerate isn't DVD compliant? So then I do need to use the "3:2 Pulldown" method when encoding??? Will this play back as true progressive on my dvd player and HDTV?

jagabo
Member


Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Location: none

Post Posted: Mar 29, 2008 12:06 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

In an NTSC video signal there is no such thing as a frame. It is always 59.94 fields per second. "3:2 pulldown when playback" encodes the video as 23.976 progressive frames per second and adds instructions that tell the DVD player how to produce those 59.94 fields per second for the TV. This is the way most NTSC movies DVDs are encoded. TMPGEnc Plus is doing exactly the right thing.

DRP
Member


Joined: 24 May 2003
Location: Oz

Post Posted: May 11, 2008 04:28 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

The weird thing is though that TMPGEnc also increases the bitrate by 25% above what you specify when you employ this method. So what you end up with is a 29.97fps video (well at least that's what every piece of software I have tells me it is) that won't fit on the disc you intended it for anymore because the bitrate is now too high.

jagabo
Member


Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Location: none

Post Posted: May 11, 2008 08:45 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

DRP wrote:
The weird thing is though that TMPGEnc also increases the bitrate by 25% above what you specify when you employ this method. So what you end up with is a 29.97fps video (well at least that's what every piece of software I have tells me it is) that won't fit on the disc you intended it for anymore because the bitrate is now too high.

As I wrote in your other thread about this, TMPGEnc is not good about hitting the requested bitrate when it is very low or very high. If you are talking about the same 1960 kbps encoding as the other thread, and single pass CBR encoding, the miss doesn't surprise me. Most programs will report 23.976 with 3:2 pulldown as 29.97 fps. Because, after pulldown, the average frame rate is 29.97.


PuzZLeR
Wild Card


Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Location: Toronto Canada

Post Posted: May 12, 2008 00:07 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Jagabo. I'm just curious here.

I have TMPGEnc Xpress and have used it for many Inverse 3:2 encoding jobs - the best MPEG-2 deinterlacer in my opinon.

The funny thing is that every other app is reading it as 29.97fps. Is the stream really 23.976fps, but somehow "passes off" as 29.97fps (for compatibility reasons)? If that's the case, then TMPGEnc is indeed really doing a fine job.

...wish I can find something that can pull this off with pulldown on x264 streams...
_________________
HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! ... HA? ... HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!


jagabo
Member


Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Location: none

Post Posted: May 12, 2008 07:25 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

PuzZLeR wrote:
I have TMPGEnc Xpress and have used it for many Inverse 3:2 encoding jobs - the best MPEG-2 deinterlacer in my opinon.

The funny thing is that every other app is reading it as 29.97fps. Is the stream really 23.976fps, but somehow "passes off" as 29.97fps (for compatibility reasons)?

I don't use TMPGEnc Express but I assume it does the 23.976 fps encoding with pulldown flags correctly, just like TMPGEnc Plus. Use GSpot to examine the output file. It will show you pics/s (23.976), frames/s (29.97), fields/s (59.94).


PuzZLeR
Wild Card


Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Location: Toronto Canada

Post Posted: May 13, 2008 12:51 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

@Jagabo:

You are indeed correct. To point out, for the thread's case, using TMPGEnc Xpress:

3:2 pulldown plaback is exactly as Jagabo described in his last post.

Inverse 3:2 pulldown is actually, seemingly, a true 29.97fps encode in almost every way using a form of interpolation. This eases frame rate fluidly but may smooth quality in doing so.

There are also other options to play around with in the Source interface under Filters.
_________________
HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! ... HA? ... HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!


Reply to topic All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Forum Index -> Video -> Advanced Video Conversion Page 1 of 1





You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Jump to:  
Display:   
About   Advertise   Forum Archive   RSS Feeds   Statistics