| Are you going to buy Windows Vista? |
| Yes - I am pre-ordered already or will pick up a copy in store |
|
4% |
[ 69 ] |
| I already have the business edition |
|
2% |
[ 41 ] |
| I am keeping my trial version for a little longer before deciding |
|
1% |
[ 25 ] |
| I am waiting until I buy a new computer and will have it preinstalled |
|
12% |
[ 192 ] |
| I am not upgrading until the majority of software requires it |
|
36% |
[ 547 ] |
| I am not a windows person - mac/linux/other |
|
6% |
[ 99 ] |
| Whats vista??? |
|
3% |
[ 47 ] |
| I don't plan on upgrading at all or until my computer dies then I may jump to vista |
|
31% |
[ 459 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 1479 |
|
| Author |
Message |
edDV Member
Joined: 06 Mar 2004 Location: Northern California, USA
|
|
All my XP installs pass the Verification but the evil MS seems to have no memory, so they ask again and again and again*. Casts doubt about their database readiness for a new OS.
* plus they send me dire warnings about consequences since I am on record as a business. I actually have more paid licenses than I am using or ever will use. Can't get no respect.
PS: IRS is worse about assuming guilt unless you prove innocense as a small businessman. Meanwhile credit card abuse never gets IRS focus. They assume they are tenth in line for payment.
_________________ Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
http://www.kiva.org/about
|
|
handyguy Member
Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
|
Lots of stores are having Vista promotions today. Lots of free stuff if you buy it.
List of promos, hot deals forum at:
http://www.fatwallet.com/
|
|
mh2360 Long Member
Joined: 01 Aug 2001 Location: UK
|
|
I have a bad feeling about Vista, like one day you try to run DVDdecrypter or something and you get a message like "This software violates Microsofts license agreement", or something, am I being paranoid?
|
|
MackemX Member
Joined: 29 Nov 2002 Location: VIP Lounge
|
|
edDV Member
Joined: 06 Mar 2004 Location: Northern California, USA
|
|
I think you will find most of the price difference is due to your value add tax and other taxes.
|
|
MackemX Member
Joined: 29 Nov 2002 Location: VIP Lounge
|
|
| edDV wrote: |
| I think you will find most of the price difference is due to your value add tax and other taxes. |
yeah but nearly twice the price is a little extreme don't you think?
_________________
check out SmileyPic if you love using smileys (LINKSKI)
|
|
edDV Member
Joined: 06 Mar 2004 Location: Northern California, USA
|
|
They've probably added in all the EU legal costs.
|
|
MackemX Member
Joined: 29 Nov 2002 Location: VIP Lounge
|
|
waheed Unique
Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Location: Manchester, UK
|
|
MackemX Member
Joined: 29 Nov 2002 Location: VIP Lounge
|
|
hudsonf Confused
Joined: 23 Aug 2002 Location: At The Computer
|
|
| mats.hogberg wrote: |
I voted for:
I am not upgrading until the majority of software requires it
...but if I know myself, I can't keep my flair for new toys at bay, and allofasudden I'm installing away...
/Mats |
I was in WalMart yesterday and gave in to temptation. I haven't installed it yet though. When I do I'm going to install it on a different hard drive and keep my original drive in case I want to go back to XP MCE 2005.
|
|
rkgibbons Member
Joined: 29 Nov 2003 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
|
|
I've been using Vista Ultimate for a couple weeks now -- and I'll never go back to Windows XP.
Things I absolutely love:
1. You can use a USB storage device to instantly add system memory to your computer. For example, you can add a 1GB USB memory key to a 512MB laptop (or old PC), and the sysem performance will improve dramatically (depending, of course, on the speed of your USB memory device). This is great when you need a little extra juice for certain applications.
2. The new search functionality is AWESOME (and always available). I never really used search in Windows XP because it usually failed to find what I was looking for (and took a long time doing it). The new search is lightning fast and works!! I use it everyday.
3. "Live Icons", or whatever the heck it's called, is awesome too. You can see what's in a file or folder without opening it. You can't under-estimate how much time and frustration this will save you until you actually try it.
4. The Interface -- come on, you have to admit that us PC users have always been a bit jealous of the look-and-feel of the Mac OS. Well, no longer. Vista is pretty on the eyes and very responsive.
DOWNSIDE:
I've had a few driver issues with some of my peripherals...but I expect them to be resolved within a few months. Nothing along the lines of when I tried to 'upgrade' to Windows XP x64. What a fiasco that was.
I'm also not thrilled with the $300 bucks I had to shell out for the software. Even now, I feel a bit angry about it, although like I said at the top: I'll never go back to Windows XP.
|
|
RLT69 Member
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
|
|
| Quote: |
| I've had a few driver issues with some of my peripherals...but I expect them to be resolved within a few months. Nothing along the lines of when I tried to 'upgrade' to Windows XP x64. What a fiasco that was. |
Question: Are you using the 64 bit version of Vista or the 32 bit version? Because as far as I can tell the driver hell you had with XP 64 is the same for Vista 64.
$300 for an O.S.! Are you insane? There's no frelling way I would spend $300 on an O.S. That's just plain stupid. There is nothing, nothing in Vista that justifies $300.
|
|
rkgibbons Member
Joined: 29 Nov 2003 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
|
|
That's $300 in Canadian money. Works out to be about $260 in United States dollars.
That's the price for the Vista Ultimate upgrade here in Canada (the full version is $500!!)
Is it worth it? You may not think so, but like I said, I would never go back to XP.
Some of the time-saving features of Windows Vista will save me countless hours (and countless mouse button clicks) over the next few years.
I'm an internet developer, so I'm always searching for bits of code, graphic elements, etc -- and the "live-icon' and search functionality built into Vista alone is worth a tremendous amount to me.
Using XP just feels clumsy and slow to me now.
That's not to say that I feel great about the $300. It still burns me a bit. But I wouldn't take the $300 back in exchange for going back to XP.
|
|
rkgibbons Member
Joined: 29 Nov 2003 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
|
|
...I have to admit that I'm also enjoying the fact that everyone who sees Vista running on my 24" wide-screen monitor literally drools on the floor.
|
|
InXess Banned
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Location: Canada
|
|
| rkgibbons wrote: |
| ...I have to admit that I'm also enjoying the fact that everyone who sees Vista running on my 24" wide-screen monitor literally drools on the floor. |
Installed Vista today and after spending most of the day playing with it I see no reason why, as you say, they all drool on the floor.
Frankly I expected more. I agree with CNET that it is no more then warmed over XP. Most options, menus, functionality is shamelessly taken directly from XP. Major annoyance is the "Continue" button preventing access to any option other then most basic.
Installation was OK, no issue here but first look and major annoyance: boot options cannot be easily modified or edited. Vista gives me no access to bcdedit.exe tool (denied !? WTF) to change menu. My old XP shows as "previous windows" and I haven't been able to rename it. As per Microsoft Vista boot manager lists only Windows Vista and "legacy" OS'es. Windows help is useless. You type one thing and it returns "similar" options. no straight answers.
I expected to be blown away as per MS management. There is no Wow in Vista, couldn't find it.
I don't plan to use it as primary OS. Windowblinds with XP give the same feel anyway. XP (for now) seems more manageable in terms of advanced options then Vista.
|
|
fritzi93 Member
Joined: 01 Nov 2003 Location: U.S.
|
|
Never. And never again a box with pre-installed crapware. My Newegg shipment should arrive today, and I'll be using Redwudz' guide to build my own. (Thanks Redwudz).
Win2K Pro will go on it to appease the wife. Then I'm gunna see if I can master Kubuntu, when I get some spare time.
_________________ Pull! Bang! Darn!
|
|
rkgibbons Member
Joined: 29 Nov 2003 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
|
|
Wow, InXess, you gave it all of a few hours before giving a review of your experiences with Vista. Looks like you really took the time to get to know the software...cripes...
You can certainly manage your boot options, but just not in the exact same way as XP. Why would you expect a tool like bcdedit.exe to work in Vista when it was designed for XP? Vista is largely a new architecture, so most of the old system-level applications likely won't work.
Oh well, go back to XP. We'll see you back on Vista in a couple years when everyone is using it.
Man, this all reminds me of the first few days when XP launched, when everyone cried about how much worse it was than Windows 98 and Windows 2000, and everyone said they'd never upgrade.
It's the first few weeks of a brand new operating system. There's going to be a LEARNING CURVE.
If you're not an early-adopter type, well, wait awhile. But don't try the software for a few hours and then dismiss it by saying that it doesn't work.
|
|
JohnnyMalaria Member
Joined: 29 May 2006 Location: United States
|
|
| InXess wrote: |
Most options, menus, functionality is shamelessly taken directly from XP.
|
Shamelessly????? It's WINDOWS. What do you expect? A completely new OS that bears no resemblence whatsoever to the previous version?
| Quote: |
Major annoyance is the "Continue" button preventing access to any option other then most basic. |
Well, then turn off UAC. Duh! You have the option. (e.g., http://www.errorforum.com/microsoft-windows-vista-error/2757-disa ... a-uac.html )
| Quote: |
boot options cannot be easily modified or edited. Vista gives me no access to bcdedit.exe tool (denied !? WTF) to change menu. My old XP shows as "previous windows" and I haven't been able to rename it.
|
That's because "Previous Windows" simply means the previous boot options - not a specific installation. I don't know why you have a problem, though. I have four "previous" versions installed along side Vista. One of which I installed afterwards. Microsoft provides details on what to do. You just need to be bothered to Google it.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa468626.aspx
| Quote: |
XP (for now) seems more manageable in terms of advanced options then Vista. |
Clearly, you just haven't given it time. You haven't even bothered to figure out how to turn off UAC....
_________________ John Miller
enosoft - high performance tools for music and video
Home of the Enosoft DV Processor - Free for personal use!
|
|
InXess Banned
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Location: Canada
|
|
| rkgibbons wrote: |
Wow, InXess, you gave it all of a few hours before giving a review of your experiences with Vista. Looks like you really took the time to get to know the software...cripes...
You can certainly manage your boot options, but just not in the exact same way as XP. Why would you expect a tool like bcdedit.exe to work in Vista when it was designed for XP? Vista is largely a new architecture, so most of the old system-level applications likely won't work.
If you're not an early-adopter type, well, wait awhile. But don't try the software for a few hours and then dismiss it by saying that it doesn't work. |
That's right I'm a fast learner. Navigating around Vista due to XP inheritance was easy. With regard to bcdedit go to MS website and try to find a document telling you exactly how to edit boot options... all the Vista docs point to bcdedit, did you know that? There's possibly a way do do it via WMI but couldn't find it. I did my DD in XP as well. Not as straight forward as you may think. Try it yourself and report back.
| JohnnyMalaria wrote: |
Shamelessly????? It's WINDOWS. What do you expect? A completely new OS that bears no resemblance whatsoever to the previous version? |
That wasn't my expectation. After several years of using XP I could think of many ways to improve it especially with regard to user interface. I was surprised and disappointed to find out that MS was so happy with it that decided to keep it almost in its entirety! If you were MS exec would you do that?
| Quote: |
Well, then turn off UAC. Duh! You have the option. |
You missed my point. It simply looks like MS decided to lower the IQ requirement for Vista users. Whatever you do is followed by "are you sure?" Disabling it is a piece of cake but I decided to share my initial (unaltered) experiences. I think this is plain stupid. It was shunned in previous versions and won't escape it now i think.
| Quote: |
That's because "Previous Windows" simply means the previous boot options - not a specific installation. I don't know why you have a problem, though. I have four "previous" versions installed along side Vista. One of which I installed afterwards. Microsoft provides details on what to do. You just need to be bothered to Google it. |
Did that, see above. Still annoying. Why? MS seems to stress by this approach that whatever you had before is ancient history, don't you think thereby enforcing Vista as the only standard now ? Childish.
| Quote: |
Clearly, you just haven't given it time. You haven't even bothered to figure out how to turn off UAC.... |
Oh, yes I have. It simply looks like excessive use of fade in and out and animation adds to functionality... There were in XP times and still are tons of applets by other developers that could make Explorer more versatile, disk management sucks just like in XP, repair options are still primitive, chkdsk is still one drive only (no multiple view, too much clicking), not to mention defrag. Simply too many to name. I'm not easy to please as "improved Windows" means a lot more for me then you. It's still feels like warmed over "XP leftovers" then a new improved OS. Win 3.1 to 95 was bigger step then XP to Vista and in that regard Vista is a letdown.
To add... it seems like MS is running out of ideas or they hesitate to improve to purposely limit users ability to perform tasks. Pick whichever you like but Apple is much more innovative, aggressive and forthcoming in their approach. Even though I've never liked Apple OS no-one can deny that they are not chasing anyone, rather trying to top themselves. MS on the other hand always stops short of expectations. Feels like if not for Apple most of the stuff in Vista wouldn't be there and whatever they included was done by someone else long before that. (like "gadgets", for example, imported straight from Apple without admitting that).
|
|
JohnnyMalaria Member
Joined: 29 May 2006 Location: United States
|
|
| InXess wrote: |
| Even though I've never liked Apple OS no-one can deny that they are not chasing anyone, rather trying to top themselves. MS on the other hand always stops short of expectations. |
Nonsense. Apple arrived nearly a decade later than MS with a multitasking, pre-emptive, kernel-based, multiprocessor-capable OS.
_________________ John Miller
enosoft - high performance tools for music and video
Home of the Enosoft DV Processor - Free for personal use!
| |