INDEX  F.A.Q.  SEARCH  LATEST POSTS     Rules  Register  Profile  Private messages  Login


Search all forums or this forum: Advanced search
What are your first impression of Windows Vista?

Forum Index -> Other -> Polls Printer-friendly version
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Reply to topic

What are your first impression of Windows Vista?
Same as Windows XP/2000, just prettier. Blah.
44%
 44%  [ 346 ]
Great upgrade compared to Windows XP/2000/2003!
9%
 9%  [ 77 ]
I hate all Windows! I use Linux or OS X or something else!
10%
 10%  [ 84 ]
What's Vista?
20%
 20%  [ 156 ]
I use YodaOS 2006 with SP313.
14%
 14%  [ 115 ]
Total Votes : 778

Author Message
lordsmurf
Video Restorer


Joined: 10 Jun 2003
Location: Want my advice? PM me.

Post Posted: Sep 02, 2006 21:13 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

I finally got some time to install the Pre-RC1 MS gave out. I installed mine inside VPC.

My first impression is that I'm using Windows XP SP2, maybe a couple of newer MS extras and a new IE7 (nothing not already available for XP), but with an Apple OS X style GUI. In other words, nothing is new. I don't see any major features that change the nature of computing.

I'm all for pretty, but we can do that already with 3rd-party software. I don't see anything special about the OS itself. It's not like the move to DOS->Win95 was.

Very lackluster. noexpression.gif
_________________
digitalFAQ.com Guides for video capturing, restoring, authoring, burning. ATI AIW help.
NoMoreCoasters.com How to avoid burning bad discs. Blank media FAQ.


Last edited by lordsmurf on Sep 03, 2006 02:13, edited 1 time in total


yoda313
POLLSTER


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Location: the real world

Post Posted: Sep 02, 2006 21:18 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

I use YO06 biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif


But seriously I haven't tested it yet. I don't want to spend the time dowloading it and I don't want to sacrifice space on my video capture harddrive on an os I'm not going to buy right away.

I'll probably get VISTA when I buy a new computer sometime nextyear or early '08.

EDIT - Are you using the 64bit version on a 64bit processor? That would be a true test of whether or not its worth it - with a 64bit capable app of coure....
_________________
Live long and prosper - and rock on dude!!!!


ViRaL1
HAZMAT


Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Location: Making the Rounds

Post Posted: Sep 02, 2006 23:11 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Nothing special. The one thing I did notice that I'd been hoping for are more forgiving options under explorer e.g. if you select all your temp files to delete and it hits one that it can't delete, it allows you to retry or skip it vs. the old way of having to deselect that file and start deleting the remaining files again. I haven't seen if it works with copy / move yet, but something like that would definitely come in handy when trying to backup entire profiles. I have it on my laptop with the graphics holding me back (32MB GeForce4 440 Go) but the rest is decent...
P4 2.53/533
1GB RAM
60GB HDD
DVD-RW

My biggest issue atm is finding compliant apps to see if I can continue to do all the things I was doing with XP.

I voted great but it's more along the line of good, a bit better than blah, but some improvement.
_________________
Nothing can stop me now, 'cause I don't care anymore.


guns1inger
So Very Tired


Joined: 01 Apr 2004
Location: Miskatonic U

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 02:17 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

On the desktop - not a lot. Yes, it's prettier, although I have had a Vista skin on XP for the better part of a year, so visually it's not a big leap. If you have a widescreen monitor or laptop then the sidebar is nice eye candy, although again, there have been standalone variants of this for XP for sometime as well.

Microsoft have stripped so much out over the last 18 months in order to get it stable that really, the biggest differentiator between XP and Vista is now Aero - if you have the grunt to use it. And for most power users, it is the first thing they will turn off in order to better allocate those resources elsewhere.

The native handling or image and file previews have been improved, and the virtual folders concept has great potential, especially in a shared environment.

But most of the truely worth while extras aren't in the consumer or even business desktop versions, they are in the server versions only.

Hopefully time will show it to be a more stable platform, with improved security and networking, but even that isn't a big leap from XP. I have always found XP to be stable and to network pretty well. Security requires keeping up to date with Windows update, as well as a good firewall, AV and anti-spyware application. While Vista will hopefully be more secure out of the box, those three applications will still be the first I install if I go to Vista.

I agree with Viral1 - better than blah, but not reaching Great status. The desktop is a slight improvement of XP, but not enough to warrant paying for an upgrade. 2000 to Vista = Yes, XP to Vista = maybe.

Longhorn (Vista Server) looks like it will be a worthwhile upgrade to 2003 server, taking a lot of the 2003 R2 improvements and adding a lot more.
_________________
The views expressed in this post are mine alone, unless plagiarised from others
Read my new blog page here


offline
incognito


Joined: 05 Jun 2002
Location: Mondo Caine

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 02:27 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

This is the 1st time I have not been interested enough to test a new candidate beta release of windows. I'll go to the usual tech launches (because I have to) but thats all I'm planning for at the moment. It will be interesting to see the initial level of corporate take-up this time around. No doubt there will be the usual line of "early adopters" lining up at dawn for their copy. laugh.gif

The Apple OS / Intel combo is starting to look real good smile.gif


guns1inger
So Very Tired


Joined: 01 Apr 2004
Location: Miskatonic U

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 04:44 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Even Vista doesn't make OS X look appealing. Unfortunately, the School I look after will probably go Vista simply to look progressive to the parents. Instead of looking for a compelling reason to upgrade, I will be looking for a compelling reason not too. And there are a lot of amateur keyboard jockies who can change a hard drive and therefore consider themselves experts who will be towing the Microsoft line of vista leading to the brave new world . . . . . . . . .
_________________
The views expressed in this post are mine alone, unless plagiarised from others
Read my new blog page here


redwudz
Mod Neophyte


Joined: 07 Sep 2002
Location: AZ, USA

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 06:05 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Considering the suggested retail prices I've seen for Vista, I'll be a XP user for some time to come. smile.gif

yoda313
POLLSTER


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Location: the real world

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 10:45 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Wow - 20% don't know what Vista is! I find that suprising. The users on this website are pretty techno-literate........
_________________
Live long and prosper - and rock on dude!!!!


SingSing
Member


Joined: 30 Apr 2001
Location: U.S.A.

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 10:46 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

OS basic function is providing a set of hooks for applications to access hardwares, and common user interface.

YodaOS 2006 with SP313 is ahead of linux and OS X as Windows alternative.

Note : For video folks, Window's media codec and media player are always among the worst.


yoda313
POLLSTER


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Location: the real world

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 10:58 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

singsing wrote:
Note : For video folks, Window's media codec and media player are always among the worst.


I don't know. Personally I find wmv quite suitable for online video. Just my opinion. However I did buy the full version of Divx 6.
_________________
Live long and prosper - and rock on dude!!!!


MeDiCo_BrUjO
Voodoo Child


Joined: 21 Mar 2002
Location: Tampa, FL

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 13:24 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Any link to download the setup?
_________________
1f U c4n r34d 7h1s, U r34lly n33d 2 g3t l41d!!!


redwudz
Mod Neophyte


Joined: 07 Sep 2002
Location: AZ, USA

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 15:41 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

According to MS concerning the Vista preview program:
Quote:
The Customer Preview Program is now closed. We have reached our program capacity and no new orders are being accepted. We apologize for any inconvenience.


If you want to make XP look and work somewhat like Vista, here's one method: http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,125324-page,1/article.html


gadgetguy
Contestant


Joined: 14 Feb 2002
Location: Michigan, USA

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 16:17 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

yoda313 wrote:
Wow - 20% don't know what Vista is! I find that suprising. The users on this website are pretty techno-literate........


Well, there is no option for "I haven't seen it or cared enough to read much about it, so I have no impression yet".
_________________
"Shut up Wesley!"
-- Captain Jean-Luc Picard


edDV
Member


Joined: 06 Mar 2004
Location: Northern California, USA

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 16:18 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Let me know when they have Vista SP1 out.

More important, let me know when they have XP SP3 out.

MS Vista may someday be as popular as the RCA Vista Series monochrome TV of the 60's.



Here's the manual



Last edited by edDV on Sep 03, 2006 20:30, edited 1 time in total


BJ_M
Patron


Joined: 30 Jul 2002
Location: Canada

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 20:14 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

nt4 is still fine as far as GUI go , 2k was a bit better ... XP and Vista are just more bloated
_________________
"Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)


SingSing
Member


Joined: 30 Apr 2001
Location: U.S.A.

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 20:19 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

gadgetguy wrote:
yoda313 wrote:
Wow - 20% don't know what Vista is! I find that suprising. The users on this website are pretty techno-literate........

Well, there is no option for "I haven't seen it or cared enough to read much about it, so I have no impression yet".

Most Window users like NT, but it lacks drivers and compatibility with Win98 programs. Windows XP solved that. But what will Vista solved ?


yoda313
POLLSTER


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Location: the real world

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 20:25 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Vista is the 64 bit solution. We'll see once there is enough market penetration for 64 bit processors and more importantly 64 bit applications.

The BLURAY-HDDVD factor will most likely be insignificant for now until one of the two wins the war.
_________________
Live long and prosper - and rock on dude!!!!


TBoneit
Member


Joined: 09 Feb 2003
Location: USA

Post Posted: Sep 03, 2006 21:17 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Well I have installed both the 32bit and 64bit versions for a customer on a dual drive computer with high speed SATA 300 drives ASUS motherboard with 4 gig 1066 DDR2 memory, Intel 3.73 EE CPU and I have to say that I was less than impressed with the Speed of that computer once I replaced the XP Pro SP2 on the C: drive.

Did I mention very fancy Video card too?

Bleh on Vista!

Yoda313 Why call Vista the 64 bit solution as compared to XP 64bit?

I can usually make XP do anything I want. It may take a little research but that's another story. But Vista? Some things seemed changed for the sake of change.

Maybe the realease version will be better at keeping Viruses and Spyware/Malware out but Those authors have been proven to be pretty good at getting their crud into users computers. They seem to be as good at the social engineering aspects as they are at the code they create and making said crud hard to remove without sometimes replacing the Windows installation.

I think I do pretty good cleaning over 85% of the computers with spyware/adware & viruses. I could also be wrong.

Cheers


wulf109
Member


Joined: 02 Jul 2002
Location: United States

Post Posted: Sep 04, 2006 01:55 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Everybody who will buy XP has. Microsoft is just creating another pointless upgrade to get more of our money. It's the Blueray of OS's.

dvdguy4
Member


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: usa

Post Posted: Sep 04, 2006 04:56 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

edDV wrote:
Let me know when they have Vista SP1 out.

More important, let me know when they have XP SP3 out.

MS Vista may someday be as popular as the RCA Vista Series monochrome TV of the 60's.



Here's the manual



Damn . I havent seen one of those in a long time .
Im staying with XP.
_________________
Life is like a pothole, you just have to learn to get around it.


TBoneit
Member


Joined: 09 Feb 2003
Location: USA

Post Posted: Sep 05, 2006 09:23 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

I remember those RCA Adverts.... I also remember my Aunt bought a RCA Color Television. The first I'd ever seen, The one with the rounded sides on the picture because it had a round picture tube being they were easier to make and setup. Remember the "In Living Color" peacock?
I'll bet we have enough people here that remeber what network did that. My first personal TV set was a RCA, Huge tabletop with a 10" round B&W tube, seperate Sound and Video IF's so the fine tuning had to be accurate.

It is possible that Vista will turn out it the long run to be another Windows ME... ME had just enough changes to be called a new OS and I always believed the real reason for it was to get money from those that have to but the newest OS when it comes out.


caernavon
Member


Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, MA

Post Posted: Sep 05, 2006 09:32 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

How about a new poll possibility called "How the heck should I know"? biggrin.gif

Sam Ontario
Member


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post Posted: Sep 05, 2006 10:42 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Its got a lot features you can play around. 2 features that I found useful are: 1. prefectching - when startup, it loads at the background into memory what applications you have done in the past, so its ready when press an icon, i.e. good for the impatients and a lot of memories will help further. 2. you can design the startup page to include different kinds of your computer features and applications.
_________________
Sam Ontario


Dv8ted2
The One


Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Location: OA

Post Posted: Sep 05, 2006 10:58 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

I use YodaOS SP313. I see no reason to change. uglylol.gif
_________________
"No evil shall escape my sight"


ROF
Banned


Joined: 04 Feb 2005
Location: USA