| Author |
Message |
gshelley61 Frequent Flyer
Joined: 19 May 2004 Location: USA
|
|
Here's how the Pioneer DVR-320 does recording with the DV input (I used a Pioneer DVR-520H as the source player, DV out)... definitely much sharper and more detailed than the 531/533. I would expect the DVR-520H to perform the same way, since it is basically a 320 with a hard drive.
I do see a bit of faint edge ghosting in the "Sid" frame. I've seen this before with Pioneer 10 and 20 series recorders. Not a big deal, but the LSI encoder chip based machines (JVC, Lite-On) do not have this artifact.
|
|
donpedro member bember
Joined: 05 Aug 2002 Location: EU
|
|
| trhouse wrote: |
| The manual does not indicate that this will cause a re-encode to occur. |
Not sure about your manual but in mine it is very clear. See couple of posts earlier (Posted: Sep 23, 2005)... page 71 in my manual.
_________________ Pinnacle Studio 8 and DV home video editing (ver.9 already home)
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|
Those 320 captures from DV look much more like one would expect from a DV input.
Here is an oddity discovered this weekend. I have the 531 set up to record daily, but it skipped the weekend and shows the timer set to record Monday. Looks like "daily" means weekdays. It must assume most people are recording daily TV which unfortunately I am not.
donpedro,
I have had this unit a short time, but I think I see what you are saying. Any time the recorder does a recording "realtime" it is either encoding or re-encoding. Is this correct?
[edit] the manuals must be different, page 71 is about "Title Name", "Erase Section", and "Move" functions for the 531.
|
|
donpedro member bember
Joined: 05 Aug 2002 Location: EU
|
|
| trhouse wrote: |
| I have had this unit a short time, but I think I see what you are saying. Any time the recorder does a recording "realtime" it is either encoding or re-encoding. Is this correct? |
Yes. And lets make it more simple. It is encoding no matter what is the source. HDD, DVD...
| trhouse wrote: |
| the manuals must be different, page 71 is about "Title Name", "Erase Section", and "Move" functions for the 531. |
Yes they are... mine is from EU version of 630. I took some time and downloaded correct manual. Please check page 66 on the right bottom side. Or just find it in your... Copy that I have is from
http://www.pioneerelectronics.ca/poc/product/manual/0,,32171715_32253025,00.html
DVR-533H-S (Owner's Manual) (8129 KB, 1162 sec @56k)
It must be in your too... you just need to find it
_________________ Pinnacle Studio 8 and DV home video editing (ver.9 already home)
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|
I found similar information to what you described in your earlier post. It describes when it does a "high speed" copy vs "realtime" but there is no reference that "realtime" means encoding, but we now know it does. What it does specifically mention is realtime being used for preserving frame accurate edits and chapters.
Unfortunately, all that aside, it will not do what I was trying to accomplish which was to do some trimming without re-encode and without having to go back to the computer.
I do like the editing features of the 531 and the multiple menu choices so it would have been very convenient.
|
|
kenw Member
Joined: 14 Sep 2005 Location: Miami, FL, US
|
|
I'm looking into getting one of these models but have a couple quick questions. I've used search to look for the answers already but have not found them.
1. Are there any required firmware updates I will need to do?
2. Is it possible with this player to get around any future problems with the broadcast flag I've been trying to read about?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
Frobozz Member
Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Location: Eugene, Oregon
|
|
| trhouse wrote: |
| Unfortunately, all that aside, it will not do what I was trying to accomplish which was to do some trimming without re-encode and without having to go back to the computer. . |
That is not the fault of the Pioneer recorder but the nature of MPEG encoding. You can't do frame accurate edits on MPEGs because such cuts can only be done on I-frames (click the Glossary link at the top of this page for information about I-frames). When you choose to edit on something other than an I-frame and insist on frame-accurate results the video around that edit must be re-encoded.
With the new Pioneer 533/633 you can record your original video at XP+ mode, do your frame-accurate editing and re-encode at the lower bit-rate you want for your DVD with such little picture quality loss (compared with encoding at the lower bit rate in the first place) that you likely won't be able to see any difference.
If frame-accurate editing without any picture quality loss is vital to you then stay with DV video editing on a computer. Personally, I wouldn't let this small issue keep me from enjoying the many benefits of my Pioneer recorder.
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|
I do not need frame accurate editing so video mode was used. The re-encode occurs going from dvd-r to the hard drive. At this point no editing has occurred. I have looked into whether other hard drive recorders can do it, but it looks like this is not unique to Pioneer. As you suggest, I would not worry too much about it.
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|
gshelley61 Frequent Flyer
Joined: 19 May 2004 Location: USA
|
|
Here's some captures made with the Sony RDR-HX900. It's a very well built (and heavy) machine with a 160GB hard drive. It has the HQ+ (15 Mbps) recording feature, with re-encoding to the recording mode of your choice. It also is one of the only recorders that has a component video input (480i only). It is set up to handle 7.5 IRE sources by default through the composite and s-video inputs, and 0 IRE sources through the component video input. It also has a IEEE 1394 DV input.
I used my DVR-520H as the source player for DV, s-video and component outputs.
The results of these tests are very good (they should be considering how expensive this unit is!)
Sony RDR-HX900, DV input, SP mode:
Sony RDR-HX900, DV input, SP mode:
Sony RDR-HX900, s-video input, SP mode:
Sony RDR-HX900, s-video input, SP mode:
Sony RDR-HX900, component video input, SP mode:
Sony RDR-HX900, component video input, SP mode:
Here's how the unit does recrding at 15Mbps (HQ+ mode) to the hard drive, then re-encoding to SP mode to disc... Sony's adaptation of two-pass encoding:
Sony RDR-HX900, DV input, HQ+ to SP mode:
Sony RDR-HX900, DV input, HQ+ to SP mode:
Just for reference, heres the same two frames captured with the JVC DR-M10 via the DV input, SP mode...
JVC DR-M10, DV input, SP mode:
JVC DR-M10, DV input, SP mode:
And here are the original THX test disc frames...
THX test disc, multi-purpose pattern:
THX test disc, Ice Age clip, "Sid":
It appears to me that the JVC still does a better job with DV to DVD conversion than the Sony. The Sony SP encodes have artifacts around some of the edges. The JVC encode looks closer to the original, with very few artifacts. However, the Sony HQ+ to SP "two-pass" encodes look real good. I'll have to do some high motion sequence testing using that method to see how they turn out.
|
|
DVWannaB Member
Joined: 30 Dec 2001 Location: United States
|
|
Gshelly61,
anything new to report with high motion scenes (XP+, XP, SP etc.) on the Sony HX900, as you promised? Thinking of picking one up. Thanks.
|
|
gshelley61 Frequent Flyer
Joined: 19 May 2004 Location: USA
|
|
| DVWannaB wrote: |
Gshelly61,
anything new to report with high motion scenes (XP+, XP, SP etc.) on the Sony HX900, as you promised? Thinking of picking one up. Thanks. |
Yeah, I did check that out... I couldn't see that much difference between that method and simply recording in SP mode to start with, although there were fewer artifacts during motion sequences. Nothing to get really excited about, though. It's still an overpriced machine.
|
|
DVWannaB Member
Joined: 30 Dec 2001 Location: United States
|
|
Thanks. I am intersted in the HX715 to go with my new HDTV sometime during the x-mas / early new year.
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|
MJA Member
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Location: IL
|
|
BrainStorm69 Tobor
Joined: 05 Aug 2002 Location: Texas, USA
|
|
| trhouse wrote: |
The encoder chip. Anyone recognize it? The numbers are line 1) M65673WG, line 2) 41109. The logo is followed by capital TS.
|
If you go the this Microsoft link, it has a list of "platforms" (read "chips") to which Windows Media Technologies (WMA, WMV) have been ported. The M65673WG shows up as a Mitsubishi Electric device.
http://wmlicense.smdisp.net/ic_approved/
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|
This information was found on a Japanese language site,
with this block diagram,
[edit]
MJA,
I think a larger thermal pad would help. The one used is pretty small compared to the size of the chip, but there are no reported problems with these units involving heat.
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|
gshelley61 Frequent Flyer
Joined: 19 May 2004 Location: USA
|
|
The inside looks about like a Lite-On in terms of layout and build quality. Note the light duty plastic case DVD burner - it looks very similar to the drives used in Lite-On units. I read somewhere that the Sony 315 is actually a re-branded Chinese made Samsung machine... although I don't know for sure.
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|
After I read your comment, I called a friend who bought an OEM Samsung dvd drive. He confirmed it has the same kind of label indicating it is designed by Toshiba Samsung. I looked the unit over a bit more and discovered the tuner is also Samsung. Looks like the encoder board might be made by TDK.
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|
gshelley61 Frequent Flyer
Joined: 19 May 2004 Location: USA
|
|
If the ES35 encodes at 720x480, it must be a new Panasonic chip (or maybe a re-branded LSI chip?).
It looks like the ES35's Line-In NR (and/or the ES30's playback MPEG DNR) was left on for those caps, too.
|
|
trhouse Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
|
|