| Movies over the years... |
| Have Gotten Better |
|
17% |
[ 368 ] |
| Have Gotten Worse |
|
37% |
[ 804 ] |
| Have Stayed About The Same |
|
17% |
[ 364 ] |
| Have Lost Their Splendor |
|
13% |
[ 298 ] |
| Have Become More Of A Playground For The Rich |
|
8% |
[ 180 ] |
| Aren't Worth Watching Anymore Since tgpo Retired From Porn In 1998 |
|
5% |
[ 120 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 2134 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tgpo No Longer Mod
Joined: 15 Feb 2002 Location: The South Side
|
|
bazooka Banned
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Location: Inner Circle of Thought
|
|
Aren't worth watching anymore.
_________________ "If you are grouchy, irritable, or just plain mean, there will be a $50 charge for putting up with you."
|
|
Sifaga More fiyah
Joined: 20 Aug 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
thats why i enjoy some of the asian movies,
they dont always follow that hollywood formula
Saw MUSA last week and enjoyed it
|
|
Capmaster Dancin' Machine
Joined: 28 Feb 2004 Location: United States
|
|
Overall about the same. The older movies had to rely on a brilliant plot and line delivery to be a success. The stories had to be unique and captivating.
Today they can make hundreds of millions off animated drawings, or a lame feature version of a '60s sitcom or cartoon like Dennis The Menace, My Favorite Martian and ...yes, even The Flintstones
But ...the cg and other fx are brilliant in many movies. Thoughtful dialogue is replaced with exploding stuff. Cool, in its own way, but not likely to inspire anything more than an occasional "dude"
_________________ Looking for a few good posters .....
|
|
Deleted Guest
|
|
...name some good movies
|
|
daamon Cockney Pommy
Joined: 10 Jun 2003 Location: Melbourne, Oz
|
|
| only_emo_kid wrote: |
...name some good movies  |
Very little from Holywood - especially recently. Most now rely on SFX to cover up a crappy story line. Probably some were even written for the SFX. More likely to find good movies from Hollywood if you go back a couple of decades.
The only decent SFX based movie in recent times was The Matrix - it was pioneering and the SFX were there to enhance the viewer's experience, not carry the plot (which, IMO, was a good one).
Lesser known but better are British movies (except, of course, the "Carry On" series - cheesy but funny enough...) - lower budgets means the plot and cinematography has to be good because there's little or no SFX to carry it.
Bollywood - Never seen one so can't comment.
Latest one that springs to mind is "Touching the Void". That's my 2-penneth worth...
_________________ There is some corner of a foreign field that is forever England: Telstra Stadium, Sydney, 22/11/2003.
Carpe diem.
If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.
|
|
Poplar SuperNoob
Joined: 05 Dec 2001
|
|
Haven't seen a good movie since American Beauty...
|
|
NamPla Member
Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Location: Whoop Whoop
|
|
shelbyGT Fuzzy Nuts
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Location: Kansas City, KS
|
|
The Girl Next Door
okay, I'll shut it
_________________
|
|
glockjs Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2004 Location: the freakin desert
|
|
i enjoy todays movies...maybe not as of right this minute but in the last couple years there have been some really good movies.
top of the list:
fight club
american history x
lock stock two barrels and a smoking gun
LOTR
Matrix series
anything that has jet li or old school jackie chan, oh yeah i just saw HERO this weekend...that movie i must say is bad ass
those are just a few off the top of my head
|
|
yoda313 POLLSTER
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Location: the real world
|
|
Hello,
It's been about the way it's always been... Some excellent movies and the rest.... Worthless.
Kevin
_________________ Live long and prosper - and rock on dude!!!!
|
|
Goober57 Confused
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Location: On vacation!!!
|
|
only_emo_kid wrote: ...name some good movies
OLD MOVIES
Goliath Awaits
Panic in Year Zero
Dirty Mary Crazy Larry
Cops and Robbers
The Sound of Music
The Wizard of OZ
The People Under the Stairs
The Attic
Used Cars
Killdozer
W W and the Dixie Dancekings
Dixie Dynamite
Dog Day Afternoon
The Great Escape
NEW MOVIES
None so far!!!
...
|
|
rhegedus Member
Joined: 25 Sep 2002 Location: on the jazz
|
|
| Capmaster wrote: |
Overall about the same. The older movies had to rely on a brilliant plot and line delivery to be a success. The stories had to be unique and captivating.
Today they can make hundreds of millions off animated drawings, or a lame feature version of a '60s sitcom or cartoon like Dennis The Menace, My Favorite Martian and ...yes, even The Flintstones
But ...the cg and other fx are brilliant in many movies. Thoughtful dialogue is replaced with exploding stuff. Cool, in its own way, but not likely to inspire anything more than an occasional "dude"  |
Agreed.
There are some newer films which when you first see them really take the breath away with either story or effects: Reservoir Dogs, Mission Impossible, Lock Stock....., The Matrix.
However, I still find myself going back to some of the older classics when story and acting was all that there was: True Grit, Zulu, The Enemy Below, Cape Fear.
The problem is that now, a lot of good films now (The Ring, Mothman Prophecies, Oceans Eleven) tend to be drowned out by a lot of hyped up dross.
_________________ Regards,
Rob
|
|
Faustus insane.
Joined: 11 Apr 2002 Location: Dallas, TX
|
|
Hrm... I think its about the same as always. We tend to remember whats special and forget whats crap. In reality there have always been and always will be alot of crappy movies.
Overall a few gems still pop up from time to time even in the mainstream.
edit: some good movies mentioned in this thread, unless I missed it let me add Shawshank Redemption, I also really like the remake of The Manchurian Candidate, I thought they really added something to the movie over the original. (not that the orginal wasn't great also)
Last edited by Faustus on Oct 20, 2004 21:07, edited 1 time in total
|
|
NamPla Member
Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Location: Whoop Whoop
|
|
It's all a matter of personal taste... Some folk here love all that CGI razzle-dazzle... Whereas I hate it, it looks dumb to me... Some people love "Titanic"... I would much rather watch "A Night To Remember"... Some people love "Gladiator"... I prefer "Spartacus"... etc etc...
I do NOT understand Hollywood's insistence on "re-making" every goddamn worthwhile film in cinema history...(and some not so worthwhile!?)... It's a sad reflection on our cultural decline, in my opinion.
Cheers.
|
|
glockjs Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2004 Location: the freakin desert
|
|
one movie that is an old movie that will never be touched is the GOOD, the BAD, and the UGLY. thats the movie right there
|
|
NamPla Member
Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Location: Whoop Whoop
|
|
Just wait, Glockjs!
The Good = Brad Pitt
The Bad = Nicole Kidman
The Ugly = Robin Williams
COMING SOON TO A THEATRE NEAR YOU!
|
|
glockjs Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2004 Location: the freakin desert
|
|
| NamPla wrote: |
Just wait, Glockjs!
The Good = Brad Pitt
The Bad = Nicole Kidman
The Ugly = Robin Williams
COMING SOON TO A THEATRE NEAR YOU!
 |
hey hey, it could happen.....maybe next box office i paid alot for this movie but it bombed because of no plot and too many stars HIT
|
|
Rookie64 In training
Joined: 07 Aug 2003 Location: USA
|
|
movies from the '60s and '70s were far more daring and original...especially the ones made outside the Hollywood System.
However, those movies weren't huge box office hits.
Art films have a hard time making it in a competive commercial industry...therfore, less are made nowadays than in the past.
Because it costs more to produce a film today, studios won't take risks or gamble with original ideas - it's always safer for them to stick with formula.
Movies in recent years seem to lack personality and often suffer from lousy writers.
Effects and makeup improved but without clever writing and personalities, you lose some of the essential ingredients to make a good film.
I tend to like older movies - there's plenty out there to discover and/or rediscover.
|
|
cal_tony Member
Joined: 14 Jun 2004
|
|
Without any lectures, let me say that movies, as a 100 year old art form, are better than they have ever been. True, with so many out there it's hard to find what you want sometimes, but good movies are everywhere. See Sundance or IFC. This webesite is dedicated to digital video and it is growing because of the easy accessibly of our members to make, copy, and edit our movies. Spielberg started with a 8mm camera, just imagine what he could have done if he began with digital. I do agree that there is so much junk out there, but every now and again I'll see something that was made on digital equip. for 10 to 20 thousand dollars that was excellent. In time, these new digital movie makers will move into the mainstream and be less constrained than their predecessors.
Here comes the lecture part, as an art form ,Books are about the story, paintings are about the visual, movies are about both. It's been said that one of the greatest paintings ever is the Mona Lisa. Damn, she's ugly and she's wearing to much clothes to suit me.
So I guess in the art world, greatness is very subjective and unless you look closely you may miss it completely
|
|
NamPla Member
Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Location: Whoop Whoop
|
|
| cal_tony wrote: |
| I do agree that there is so much junk out there, but every now and again I'll see something that was made on digital equip. for 10 to 20 thousand dollars that was excellent. |
Sure, but you're talking underground cinema, not Hollywood.
There's a lot of cool underground filmmaking going on, outside the corporate "establishment".
Just go have a look at "Dirtbags" (http://www.thegrimoire.com/dirtbags.htm) -
"Misogynist: The Movie"
"Lesbo A-Go-Go"
"Come Get Some"
"Cthulhu" ......
|
|
Elrik Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2003
|
|
There isn't exactly an option that I would've chosen. I went with "Have gotten worse" but it needs clarification. IMO, the MAJORITY of modern movies are utter crap. However, a select few and rare ones that ARE enjoyable have gotten better. If you compare an excellent modern movie with great story and acting to an older movie with the same attributes, the modern movie will also have much higher technical standards -- clearer and better audio, much better colors and clarity, less artifacts/noise, less shaky camera etc.
In other words, the BEST of TODAY is better than the BEST of YESTERDAY but there are too many crappy talentless movies nowadays.
|
|
SLICK RICK Driver
Joined: 04 Mar 2003 Location: Houston, Tx by way of N.O
|
|
| only_emo_kid wrote: |
...name some good movies  |
I'll name one....
Shawshank Redemption.
_________________
| lordsmurf wrote: |
| Nobody likes a bunch of yackity-yack. |
|
|
Deleted Guest
|
|
American History X, Evil Dead 1,2. Army of Darkness, Lost in Translation, Requiem for a dream...
|
|
SLICK RICK Driver
Joined: 04 Mar 2003 Location: Houston, Tx by way of N.O
|
|
The Godfather, Scarface, and Blow.
_________________
| lordsmurf wrote: |
| Nobody likes a bunch of yackity-yack. |
|
|
The_Pioneer Member
Joined: 02 Dec 2002 Location: England
|
|