INDEX  F.A.Q.  SEARCH  LATEST POSTS     Rules  Register  Profile  Private messages  Login


Login:   Username:  Password:   Log me on automatically    
Register I forgot my password I forgot my username Resend the activation key

S-Video v. RCA Video Output

Forum Index -> Hardware -> DVD & Blu-ray Players Printer-friendly version
Reply to topic
Author Message
RKelly
Member


Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Location: United States

Post Posted: Mar 13, 2004 23:54 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

Hello--
I was wondering if somebody could explain to me why S-Video output is better than RCA (video) output. I have a hard time seeing a real difference between the two, and RCA plugs works better/easier for me. Is there any real difference, or is it minimal enough to keep with the RCA? thanks!

-Ryan


Defcon
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2004
Location: FL

Post Posted: Mar 14, 2004 00:21 Posts View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

I will say this (others will disagree) but I just returned TODAY, A set of component cables and ended up exchanging them for a good set of RCA (Red/White/Yellow)

I did notice a nice difference with the set of good RCA vs. what comes in the box w/ the DVD players. I have tried all the options:

1. RCA - supposedly good
2. S-Video - supposedly better
3. Component (Red/Blue/Green) - supposedly best

Well, I like a good set of RCA cables the best.....


Bob W
Member


Joined: 19 Feb 2003

Post Posted: Mar 14, 2004 00:29 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

http://www.projectorcentral.com/component.htm read all of it. smile.gif
Here is an interesting comment.

"The second connection option (the better option) is that you can use the clumsy 4-pin S-video jacks. This often requires a trip to the electronics store to get a more expensive cable. Most people don't want to bother. So they use the yellow RCA jacks because they are labeled VIDEO, and because that's the cable that came with the DVD player. Once they hook it up and turn it on, they find that the picture looks better than their VCR. So they are happy and forget about S-video. This is of course the wrong thing to do.

Why? Because by using the yellow RCA video jacks, you are forcing your DVD player to down-convert all that great component video information on the DVD to lowly composite video in order to transmit it to your television or projector. You lose much of the picture quality that the DVD can deliver by doing this. OK, it looks better than your VCR. But you aren't getting the best picture you can get."


disturbed1
Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2001
Location: init 4

Post Posted: Mar 14, 2004 02:03 Posts Comp View users profile Send private message Reply with quote

S-Video supports upto 500 lines of resolution, composite supports less than 400, 330 I believe but could be wrong.

You of course need a TV that can decode 500 lines of resolution. Most of last years mid level sets decode around 450-480 lines. If you picked up an RCA on sale at the local Walmart, you most likely won't see a difference between S-Video and composite.

A good RCA cable is better than a stock (crappy) S-Video cable. Downside to S-Video is than it can amplify any noise in the video, while Composite, with less resolution, may seem to mask it.


Reply to topic All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Forum Index -> Hardware -> DVD & Blu-ray Players Page 1 of 1





You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Jump to:  
Display:   
Replay Video Capture, if you can Watch it, you can Capture it ! and save it to your computer. More info or download trial!
About   Advertise   Forum Archive   RSS Feeds   Statistics