VideoHelp Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread
  1. Can anyone help?

    I am trying to burn/superimpose the date and time that is recorded on the mts file from the camcorder on to the video file (without losing video quality).

    I have been googling this for a long time. most information I come across is to enter timecode which then turns out to be something like a stop watch timer.

    There is not much information on the internet on how to do this and also not much good software out there that does this for some reason. I think I'm the only person who wants to superimpose the date and time of the video shot in the world lol. I think its important to capture this into the video if you're recording memories then 10 years later you know when this happened.

    If there is a good software does this do let me know. I have invested a lot of energy onto ffmpeg to do this but now I'm stuck and joined this site for help.
    Quote Quote  
  2. I'm a MEGA Super Moderator Baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Sweden
    Search Comp PM
    ffmpegx is not ffmpeg. I'm moving you to our camcorder section.

    I have no idea if ffmpeg can read the date and time in mts. But you will lose quality if you burn in something as it requires reconversion. But if you use high video quality settings shouldn't you notice anything.

    Or use Visual AVCHD Time Stamp.
    Quote Quote  
  3. avchd2srt to extract the data as srt subs. You can leave it like that (softsubs) to keep the same quality; or burn them (hardsub) in with ffmpeg which takes longer & lose quality

    https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/316229-Export-AVCHD-frame-specific-metadata-to-subtitles
    Quote Quote  
  4. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by ks2015 View Post
    I think I'm the only person who wants to superimpose the date and time of the video shot in the world lol.
    And for a reason!

    Originally Posted by ks2015 View Post
    I think its important to capture this into the video if you're recording memories then 10 years later you know when this happened.
    Why deface the video like that?

    If it is important to you then add a five second title before each segment showing event, place and date.

    Quote Quote  
  5. Of course you should timestamp your videofiles. The original files can be saved too as data space is so cheap today.
    I have always timestamped my DV and HDV-files. When I have asked something about this on the internet I always receive some odd comments about destroying the film with the date.
    From experience with old photos from last century I know that many photos are of little value as one donot know when they were taken.
    It will of course be the same for our grandchildren when they look at our old films with no date.
    For HD I have found 3 programs for timestamp. VATS, DVMPpro and Superdvdate.
    I have had some problems with the sound which can be delayed and not synchronized. However it is not too much - less than half a second.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by uno View Post
    Of course you should timestamp your videofiles.
    If you insist on maintaining meta information on digital media (which is really not required as there are containers for that) you can insert static frames with timestamp and other information before each new scene.

    It is really common sense not to deface the video!

    You can go classic:



    Or techie:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	leader.gif
Views:	548
Size:	1.95 MB
ID:	31475

    Or artsy:



    Last edited by newpball; 30th Apr 2015 at 11:07.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member Cornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Deep in the Heart of Texas
    Search PM
    I agree with uno, if you have the space available, it is perfectly acceptable - and often more efficient in the workflow - and common to have a duplicate that is a window burn (aka timestamp overlaid, mixed down & hard-coded, aka BITC or VizCode).
    No professional and very few consumers would advocate permanently tatooing their only/original copy. No need to create drama where it doesn't exist.

    I second pdr's suggestion.

    Scott
    Quote Quote  
  8. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by Cornucopia View Post
    No professional and very few consumers would advocate permanently tatooing their only/original copy.
    I think it is far more common than you make it out to be.

    Quote Quote  
  9. When I have used these programs they are not stamping the original file but they create a new copy. It is as simple as that.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!