I've gathered equipment for capturing Australian PAL VHS-C tapes.
ATI AMD TV Wonder HD 600 USB 2.0(set up as a "USB 2883 Device" on Windows 7 64bit)
AVToolbox AVT 8710(black, I'm not certain how to determine if it's working correctly or defective)
JVC VHS-C Cassette Adapter C-P7U
Panasonic NV-FS200(German, Should I enable TBC?, I also hear a static, click sound every few seconds when using RCA cables for audio while playing a VHS tape)
I plan on using S-Video cables to capture the video, RCA stereo white and red for audio.
I understand VHS-C tapes are terrible quality wise, however I'd like to get as much out of them as possible.
Is there any other equipment I should obtain before proceeding? Is there a specific brand of S-Video, or RCA cable I should buy?
What's the best program for capturing using the equipment I've listed? Which resolution should I capture at? Are there any other settings I'll need to worry about?
Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays! or rip iTunes movies!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread
-
-
Originally Posted by gary_y
Originally Posted by gary_y
I would say it's a very flaky product, but very good when working (but a good compromise since you saved thousands of dollars getting this one instead of a broadcast level TBC). From my experience, it's best used when power cycling for a new tape, or after you activate a VCR menu, or similar. Once it starts filtering a tape, and you do nothing during that time, only play the tape, it will not be thrown off. If inserting a new tape, then you may need to power cycle it again.
It's only when you change the signal that affects it, so you may have to modify your workflow for it.
Other that that, it's fine. Its job is to clean the harsh signal from analog tape and avoid dropped frames. It can help with tape jitter indirectly somewhat, but that's not what it's supposed to do.
To see if it's defective, try a tape that emits a "false positive", or MV. If it filters a clean signal, it's "working".
Sometimes it tends to produce ghosting, but if you use more than one VCR in the mix, it will work better with another on a given tape.
If you really find the AVT-8710 troublesome, you can try the Panasonic ES10/ES15 DVR as a passthrough (although it won't correct MV).
Originally Posted by gary_y
As for the internal TBC on the Panasonic, it didn't work for me on any of my AG-1980's that I've used (had two of them once). Since this one was a field TBC, it would output the wrong field order at times, completely at random, so since this can be disastrous to an editing workflow, I gave up on it. Can't say for sure with your unit though. Maybe someone else can chime in here.
The audio was great on the AG-1980, so can't comment here. But if you have another VCR that produces better audio - use that one for audio, and edit/mux the two capture results afterwards.
Originally Posted by gary_y
The red and whites are just fine for audio.
Originally Posted by gary_y
Originally Posted by gary_y
Originally Posted by gary_y
What's the best program for capturing using the equipment I've listed? Which resolution should I capture at? Are there any other settings I'll need to worry about?
My settings are somewhat listed here:
https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/365390-How-do-I-use-VirtualDub-to-capture-8mm-camco...=1#post2329569
Since you're in PAL, I say use 720x576, 25fps to capture.Last edited by PuzZLeR; 27th Jun 2014 at 10:17.
I hate VHS. I always did. -
So in the past few weeks I finally got around to capturing my VHS-C tapes using all of the settings suggested by you(thanks) and I'm pretty satisfied with the way they've turned out.
But I've been looking around and I'm wondering whether I've made a mistake disabling the full-field TBC on my NV-FS200 and only relying on the AVT 8710. Would there be any difference in the quality if I'd used both? I'm trying to get the best quality possible, so I'd appreciate if anyone could please tell me if I should re-do them with the TBC enabled. -
Look for wiggling lines or attach a sample video containing vertical lines so we can look.
-
Usually a line tbc like the AVT-8710 is used to defeat Macrovision copy protection. I don't think your VHS-C tapes are copy protected. Otherwise it is used to help maintain proper video frame rate and audio sync.
Yes. The player has a line-level tbc used to reduce distortion in all analog tapes. The AVT-8710 has no effect on this problem.
That's correct. Avoid composite cable for video.
It doesn't matter.
Capture with Virtualdub to YUY2 colorspace, 720x576 interlaced with huffyuv or Lagarith lossless compression. From losslesss AVI you can do any processing you want without quality loss from re-compression, and you can encode later to any output format you want.Last edited by LMotlow; 15th Dec 2014 at 01:50.
- My sister Ann's brother -
OK, I've done that. There is a definitely a noticeable improvement with TBC enabled, thanks. I'm going to re-do my tapes. *sigh*
I've been capturing at 720x576 because my tapes are PAL. Is there any reason why I should capture with 720x480 instead? -
Nope, stay at 720x576. He probably just didn't notice your location. If you need to save space you can capture at some lower horizontal resolution (e.g. 360x576) with VHS, but the amount of lines is fixed with the video standard.
-
Oops. Yep, you're correct. I overlooked that teentsy detail. Will correct my post above. Thanks.
As lossless AVI, the capture will of course display as 720x576 and will look that way in VirtualDub and most editor windows. That's because decoded lossless video itself has no DAR (Display Aspect Ratio) other than its own physical dimensions. But VirtualDub, most editors, and most decent media players let you adjust the display so that 720x576 looks like a 4:3 image. This affects only the display, not the video itself. I mention it because a lot of folks have a panic attack the first time they see decoded video.
Last edited by LMotlow; 15th Dec 2014 at 01:59.
- My sister Ann's brother