VideoHelp Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread
  1. I have been converting some home movies from VHS to a digital format. I have been using a 2000-era Quasar 4-Head VCR connected to my capture card via RCA composite connection. When I compare the original tape coming off a Sony Hi8 over S-Video to the archived VHS of the same tape, I see more resolution, better picture in the original Sony Hi8 tape...not surprised. I think some of this resolution difference might be due to S-Video vs. composite connection. Of course, I am using the original Hi8 source when I can, but I cannot do that in all cases. Is it worth buying a VCR that has S-Video output? Since S-Video did not exist when the VHS tapes were copied, they would have been copied via a RCA composite connection best case. Therefore, the video source that I have probably has poor resolution to start out with. Is it worth tracking down a better VCR on craigslist for the S-Video output?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Formerly 'vaporeon800' Brad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Search PM
    The difference you are seeing is because Hi8 is much, much better than VHS, not because of S-Video. To prove this to yourself, connect the Hi8 via composite.

    S-Video doesn't particularly improve resolution unless your capture device specifically lowpasses luma on its composite input. It was invented to reduce analog color encode/decode steps. If your tapes have some high resolution details, using S-Video should reduce the presence of luma-chroma interference artifacts called rainbowing and dot crawl.

    Visually compare composite to S-Video here for example.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!