Hey everybody
I use Handbrake, Ripbot264 and Staxrip as my converters, But I need a advice for the framerate, should it be Constant or Variable and why, and should I choose same as source or a framerate of my choosing?
I have bin using CONSTANT framerate for a while, but I read that with some videos it will be better with VARIABLE because of interlacing and if the framerate changes in the movie.
Its maybe simple question for you guys, but it has really bin a hard choice for me.
I hope you can explain your answers to me also.
JackDanielZ
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 19 of 19
Thread: Variable or Constant Framerate?
Thread
-
-
Just use constant and enable Decomb then select Default.
My reason: if the studios don't use variable framerate then neither should we, if you want to make a smaller size file then use variable bitrate.
https://trac.handbrake.fr/wiki/VariableFrameRate
What I use:
https://trac.handbrake.fr/wiki/DecombLast edited by MOVIEGEEK; 15th Feb 2013 at 15:21.
-
Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. -- Henry David Thoreau
-
MKV supports vfr, and if a movie has both telecined and truly interlaced content, then vfr can be of help.
-
No way it's "better". Better for what, and for what media and players? Telecine/interlace mix are everywhere. Never heard of anyone claiming VFR made them "play better", but VFR does exist. Try processing it sometime without screwing up the works.
Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. -- Henry David Thoreau -
If you have to encode them for a single framerate (telecine and true video) you wind up blending frames and the video will play slightly jerky and slightly blurry both. In such cases VFR encoding can be useful. Another place where it's often used is with animations where you have all the duplicate frames and all kinds of 'base' framerates. Yes, if the player doesn't support VFR you'll wind up with a real mess, but in many cases VFR can be very useful.
-
Cleaning up video is tough enough without letting oneself in for more. I'd avoid it at the outset. I can recall seeing many many many many posts by poor frustrated devils having a helluva time with it, and stuck with video that can't be fixed.
Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. -- Henry David Thoreau -
-
Thank you everyone... The TEXT that made me confused was this page: https://trac.handbrake.fr/wiki/VariableFrameRate and then scroll down to Variable Frame Rate
What also confused is that example, if u choose the HIGH Profile in Handbrake it chooses VRF and I thought with my newbie knowledge "The HIGH PROFILE CHOOSEs VRF, THEN IT MUST BE THE BEST QUALITY VISE, SINCE ITS A HIGH PROFILE" -
Yes, I get what you're saying. My last experience with a chunk of VFR video was over a year ago, bad experience of an acquaintance with a family tape transferred to mkv with VFR problems.
Oh, well. And people used to say VHS was a low-quality pain in the neck. We seem determined to come full circle again.Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. -- Henry David Thoreau -
my memory "real media" video was famous for VFR
and a real PITA to convert to anything else
NEVER EVER use VFR -
VFR ONLY makes sense for sending unedited clips from phone to phone because of potential bandwidth savings and the ability to compenste for low light by using longer exposure per frame. In that sense alone it is kind of an elegant solution.
For real life, use CFR. -
for me vfr makes send for material that:
a. will benefit from vfr, meaning content with often static and sometimes really active scenes (powerpoint stuff, lectures, old style animes)
b. isn't ment for later editing (or reencoding to cfr)
c. aims for software players -
Given some NTSC video can be a combination of 23.976 and 29.970, it kind of makes sense to me to keep it as it is, rather than try to convert part of it to a common frame rate, assuming it generally wouldn't cause any problem on playback.
Assuming you're encoding a DVD to watch the encode, and any need to re-encode the encode at a constant framerate isn't particularly relevant, would using Handbrake's variable frame rate mode for film/video combinations be likely to cause playback problems? I assume the Handbrake developer(s) don't think so, but I don't live in NTSC-land and I've never encoded with Handbrake myself. -
I would recommend using CFR because then the resulting film will have better compability.
-
I know nothing about encoding but a lot about watching. MKVs made with handbrake using variable frame rate always give me trouble on my hardware media player.
I found a fix at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twpFORfRPoc and mostly it works.
I would suggest that all those who are planning to distribute MKVs test them with the procedure shown in the YouTube VDO. If you get no errors then carry on. If you get errors try again or distribute as is but expect dissatisfaction from some like me who cannot play them, as is, on their hardware media players.
Same goes for AVIs encoded in XVID with GMC (Warpoints) on. A total no-no for my hardware media player.Get Your Facts Straight
Similar Threads
-
Converting a "variable framerate" to constant framerate?
By vieo in forum Video ConversionReplies: 6Last Post: 2nd Sep 2010, 09:05 -
MKV with Variable Framerate convert to MP4 problem
By beaniekapp in forum Video ConversionReplies: 12Last Post: 4th Jul 2010, 08:44 -
Variable Bitrate or Constant Bitrate?
By i am x in forum Video ConversionReplies: 3Last Post: 12th Feb 2010, 07:49 -
Canon EOS movie: variable framerate problem
By jullebarge in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 7Last Post: 19th Jul 2009, 17:54 -
Variable FRAMErate dvd demuxing
By gbi in forum Video ConversionReplies: 8Last Post: 11th May 2009, 07:24


Quote
