+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 20
Thread
  1. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2012
    Location: UK
    Search PM
    It's a gameplay recording using http://www.hauppauge.com/site/products/data_hdpvr2-gaming.html

    An MP4 file.

    I've tried Avidemux... I've tried about 10 programs, some mentioned on this site, but nothing seems to work.

    Some programs close as soon as I load it in. Some will load it but won't allow me to cut. With Avidemux the screen stutters.

    Is there anything out there?
    Quote Quote  
  2. I'm a MEGA Super Moderator Baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2000
    Location: Sweden
    Search Comp PM
    Tried videoredo tvsuite h264? Or Solveigmm Video Splitter.

    Or are you just looking for free software?
    Last edited by Baldrick; 9th Dec 2012 at 06:00.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2012
    Location: UK
    Search PM
    I've been trying lots of trials. Want to try trials first

    I'll try these two.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2012
    Location: UK
    Search PM
    Just tried videoredo, the audio goes way out of sync.
    Quote Quote  
  5. I'm a MEGA Super Moderator Baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2000
    Location: Sweden
    Search Comp PM
    Doesn't hauppuage have some simple tool for lossless editing?

    Can you capture in some other container than mp4? Like avchd/mts/m2ts.


    But lossless editing has always caused problems and even worse now with more video features like variable framerate and other advanced features.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2012
    Location: UK
    Search PM
    Solveigmm Video Splitter crashes.

    Will it be possible to do this at some point without having to re-encode?

    I mean soon? Could someone make a program?
    Quote Quote  
  7. I'm a MEGA Super Moderator Baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2000
    Location: Sweden
    Search Comp PM
    Probably not then.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: Freedonia
    Search Comp PM
    We've talked about this before, but there are issues with MP4 recordings under Hauppauge. You'll get better results if you record to MKV format (works best) or TS format (better than MP4 but maybe a bit less reliable than MKV) and edit those. You can use something like VideoReDo to save the final result to MP4 if you wish. Recording directly to MP4 format just doesn't seem to work well on a variety of Hauppauge devices.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: Freedonia
    Search Comp PM
    Oh - and to follow up on your MANY other threads, now closed, related to this...
    Hauppauge isn't known for get tech support. Their official forums are just about worthless. But record to MKV or TS format, edit that, and save to MP4 or save to the same format you recorded to and then use that file to create an MP4 file. I'm sure there's probably some kind of program out there that could take MKV or TS input and remux everything to MP4 for you quickly.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member
    Join Date: Jan 2012
    Location: Budapest
    Search Comp PM
    The so-called: " Video to video converter " is the only reliable product for cut/merge videos with direct stream copy without any audio-sync problems.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date: Feb 2009
    Location: United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Stears555 View Post
    The so-called: " Video to video converter " is the only reliable product for cut/merge videos with direct stream copy without any audio-sync problems.
    Stears555, have YOU used this program much? When I visit their site, I find it all so bland that I worry that there must be a ton of adware/spyware that will get installed. What happened when YOU installed it? And how much have you used it successfully (no added sync errors, no reencoding, etc.)
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member
    Join Date: Jan 2012
    Location: Budapest
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by TCmullet View Post
    Originally Posted by Stears555 View Post
    The so-called: " Video to video converter " is the only reliable product for cut/merge videos with direct stream copy without any audio-sync problems.
    Stears555, have YOU used this program much? When I visit their site, I find it all so bland that I worry that there must be a ton of adware/spyware that will get installed. What happened when YOU installed it? And how much have you used it successfully (no added sync errors, no reencoding, etc.)

    Utmost all free softwares apply adwares (which are not dangerous). It's direct-stream-copy mode worked perfectly with Tranport streams and other containers, it can merge and cut videos without any sync problems.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member sanlyn's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: New York, US
    Search Comp PM
    TMPGenc Smart Renderer 4. Not free. Trial available. MPEG, mp4, mkv, BluRay, AVCHD . etc. + Dolby, PCM, AAC, mp2, mp3.
    Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. -- Henry David Thoreau
    Quote Quote  
  14. Member
    Join Date: Jan 2012
    Location: Budapest
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by sanlyn View Post
    TMPGenc Smart Renderer 4. Not free. Trial available. MPEG, mp4, mkv, BluRay, AVCHD . etc. + Dolby, PCM, AAC, mp2, mp3.
    But , the well known "smart rendering" is not a real direct-stream-copy mode! It reencodes some parts of the video in editing (merge and cut) points. Since the second half of 2012, when FFmpeg made reality the frame-accurate perfect cut and merge of video files with direct-stream-copy (without any reencoding) , the other "smart rendering" methods became obsolete immediately.
    Quote Quote  
  15. Member sanlyn's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: New York, US
    Search Comp PM
    Never had a problem with the TMPgenc mentioned. Unless the video itself is a "problem", in which case there's a lot of work to do. The O.P. sez he's in a hurry. I don't see how ffmpeg or its GUI's can be used in a hurry, but it's worth a try.
    Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. -- Henry David Thoreau
    Quote Quote  
  16. Member
    Join Date: Jan 2012
    Location: Budapest
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by sanlyn View Post
    Never had a problem with the TMPgenc mentioned. Unless the video itself is a "problem", in which case there's a lot of work to do. The O.P. sez he's in a hurry. I don't see how ffmpeg or its GUI's can be used in a hurry, but it's worth a try.


    "smart rendering" technology (a lot of softwares use it) reencodes some parts of the video in editing (merge and cut) points." It means loss of quality in editing points, therefore it is obsolete in simple cut/merge operations.
    Last edited by Stears555; 28th Jan 2013 at 08:56.
    Quote Quote  
  17. Member sanlyn's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: New York, US
    Search Comp PM
    No doubt you are correct, not questioning that. I've given ffmpeg a few trials myself. I venture it would take the O.P. a week of updates, ancillary support file installs, and whatnot, to get it going. The O.P. is in PAL country, gives no computer profile info, so no telling what the computer would need. But it will certainly work, once it's properly set up.
    Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. -- Henry David Thoreau
    Quote Quote  
  18. My understanding regarding the re-encoding of the area around a cut point, is that if you don't cut on a keyframe you'll be potentially removing frames which are required by other frames for decoding. Therefore when not cutting on a keyframe, some re-encoding is required. How does ffmpeg get around that?
    Quote Quote  
  19. Member
    Join Date: Sep 2007
    Location: Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by hello_hello View Post
    My understanding regarding the re-encoding of the area around a cut point, is that if you don't cut on a keyframe you'll be potentially removing frames which are required by other frames for decoding. Therefore when not cutting on a keyframe, some re-encoding is required. How does ffmpeg get around that?
    It doesn't get around that. There is some misinformation being spread.

    When using -vcodec copy -acodec copy, ffmpeg skips to nearest keyframe . It's GOP accurate, not frame accurate. (It's analgous to how mkvtoolnix or tsmuxer would "cut") . Yes , there is no re-encoding, but the cuts are not accurate with long GOP material.


    The OP's problem is hdpvr2 streams are damaged or non standard. A firmware update should fix that if it already hasn't been released
    Quote Quote  
  20. Member sanlyn's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: New York, US
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by poisondeathray View Post
    Originally Posted by hello_hello View Post
    My understanding regarding the re-encoding of the area around a cut point, is that if you don't cut on a keyframe you'll be potentially removing frames which are required by other frames for decoding. Therefore when not cutting on a keyframe, some re-encoding is required. How does ffmpeg get around that?
    It doesn't get around that. There is some misinformation being spread.

    When using -vcodec copy -acodec copy, ffmpeg skips to nearest keyframe . It's GOP accurate, not frame accurate.
    That was my past experience, so it appears that this aspect of ffmpeg hasn't changed. I haven't used it for some time. There are cutters other than TMPGenc's, but it seems to do OK....source structural problems aside.
    Last edited by sanlyn; 30th Jan 2013 at 11:42.
    Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. -- Henry David Thoreau
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Search   Contact us   About   Advertise   Forum   RSS Feeds   Statistics   Tools