+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 18 of 18
Thread
  1. Member brassplyer's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Location: United States
    Search Comp PM
    I've been trying various Virtualdub deinterlace filters but find that with all of them, residual artifacts get left behind. I try a difference deinterlacer or setting and one part of the video looks better but it introduces issues in another part. Lines/jaggies around eyes, mouths, backs of jackets, shiny metallic surfaces etc. I can't seem to find a deinterlacer/setting that eliminates all issues.

    Is there such a thing as a deinterlace filter that makes the video look like it was shot progressively?

    What I'm focusing on at the moment is VHS transf'd via firewire and converted to HuffYuv.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: none
    Search Comp PM
    No, there are no great deinterlacers for VirtualDub. About the best you're going to find is Yadif. But it doesn't come close to QTGMC() in AviSynth. Even at its preset="ultra fast" settings QTGMC is better than anything in VirtualDub.
    Last edited by jagabo; 2nd Dec 2012 at 21:19.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member brassplyer's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Location: United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    No, there are no great deinterlacers for VirtualDub. About the best you're going to find is Yadif. But it doesn't come close to QTGMC() in AviSynth. Even at its preset="ultra fast" settings QTGMC is better than anything in VirtualDub.
    The mediafire links to this on avisynth.org

    http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/QTGMC#Links:

    get warnings from McAfee siteadvisor. Any suggestions?
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: none
    Search Comp PM
    I don't know why McAfee doesn't like it...
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member brassplyer's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Location: United States
    Search Comp PM
    What version of avisynth does this require? I have 2.5.8 currently.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date: Nov 2005
    Location: United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    No, there are no great deinterlacers for VirtualDub. About the best you're going to find is Yadif. But it doesn't come close to QTGMC() in AviSynth. Even at its preset="ultra fast" settings QTGMC is better than anything in VirtualDub.
    isn't that a bit of a dubious statement? from what i have read qtgmc with the "ultrafast" preset uses yadif for deinterlacing, so if you can use yadif with v-dub then there's no advantage in switching to qtgmc with the ultrafast preset.

    also, from what i can see from poking around the qtgmc script all it really amounts to is using someone else's deinterlacer + sharpening and a few other tweaks, couldn't one just chain a bunch of similar filters and settings in v-dub or similar editing program and get the same results.

    i guess basically what i'm asking isn't qtgmc a tad overrated?
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: none
    Search Comp PM
    2.5.8 should be fine. I recommend you get the "plugin package with all requirements" if you don't have a lot of AviSynth filters already.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member brassplyer's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Location: United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    2.5.8 should be fine. I recommend you get the "plugin package with all requirements" if you don't have a lot of AviSynth filters already.
    I'm pretty much an Avisynth noob. I've fooled with it before but am being reminded of why I found it to be a pain to use.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member sanlyn's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: New York, US
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by deadrats View Post
    i guess basically what i'm asking isn't qtgmc a tad overrated?
    No.
    Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. -- Henry David Thoreau
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member sanlyn's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: New York, US
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by brassplyer View Post
    The mediafire links to this on avisynth.org

    http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/QTGMC#Links:

    get warnings from McAfee siteadvisor. Any suggestions?
    Many advanced users suggest that McAfee itself is as bad as a virus. You mean you don't recall a short time back when their "free" scanner thought Google's home page was a Trojan?
    Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. -- Henry David Thoreau
    Quote Quote  
  11. Hoover Fanatic budwzr's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2007
    Location: City Of Angels
    Search Comp PM
    And isn't the CEO wanted for murder?
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member
    Join Date: Mar 2011
    Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Yes, and I think he may have been caught. Not 100% on that though. Bizarre story.

    Actually many antivirus programs give you a lot of false positives. One of the tech support people at the local university, where all students have to own a laptop and they are very integrated, told me that mse is the only one that's never screwed up on the network.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: none
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by brassplyer View Post
    Is there a Virtualdub deinterlacer that doesn't leave residual artifacts?
    And just to be clear: there are absolutely no deinterlacers that deliver artifact free results. And there never will be. You can't create a full picture from half a picture without "guessing" what is missing.
    Quote Quote  
  14. Member
    Join Date: Sep 2007
    Location: Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by budwzr View Post
    And isn't the CEO wanted for murder?

    OT: Is he still the CEO? I thought he sold the company years ago and basically retired on some island ?
    Quote Quote  
  15. Hoover Fanatic budwzr's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2007
    Location: City Of Angels
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by poisondeathray View Post
    Originally Posted by budwzr View Post
    And isn't the CEO wanted for murder?

    OT: Is he still the CEO? I thought he sold the company years ago and basically retired on some island ?
    OK, then "founder".
    Quote Quote  
  16. Member brassplyer's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Location: United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by deadrats View Post
    i guess basically what i'm asking isn't qtgmc a tad overrated?
    Having finally gotten it up and running and seeing the results, it doesn't seem overrated to me. As previously advertised, much better results than anything I've managed to get out of Vdub deinterlace filters.
    Quote Quote  
  17. Member sanlyn's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: New York, US
    Search Comp PM
    QTGMC usually works well at its default "presets", but there must be 50 parameters you can play with -- when you need it. Note that most of the secret magic words are in the .avsi script; if you double-click it and try to open it as text, it looks like a binary file. Just open it in Windows Wordpad and save an extra copy as *.txt.

    The designer states that originally QTGMC was just for deinterlacing and repair of badly deinterlaced video, but somehow a lot of excellent denoising was required in the process. So QTGMC is also a pretty good denoiser in some respects (although according to the script you can preserve the noise, if you wish!). I use it to repair really bad VHS interlacing and other problems. Or to deinterlace for running AVisynth plugins that work progressive-only, but I reinterlace afterwards. If my original source is interlaced, I archive it that way: once you deinterlace the source and discard the interlaced original, you're limited to progressive-only encoded formats forever.

    Get inside the actual script as a .txt file and you'll see that it's more than just a pretty face. The HTML help that comes with it only scratches the surface.

    BTW, most VirtualDub filters don't care about interlace. Those that do will have a check box to indicate interlaced video in their setup dialogs. But they don't deintetlace; internally they likely just use the equivalent of:

    SeparateFields()
    [ do some processing ]
    Weave()

    The above method is usually used in Avisynth to use progressive-only plugins without deinterlacing.
    Last edited by sanlyn; 4th Dec 2012 at 08:03.
    Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. -- Henry David Thoreau
    Quote Quote  
  18. Member brassplyer's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Location: United States
    Search Comp PM
    Doing further experimenting, I continue to be impressed. Just the basic clarity of the resulting image is so much better than what I was getting before, I find I don't even need some of the Vdub filters I was using previously to tweak the deinterlaced image - seems they were just compensating for some of the shortcomings of the other deinterlacers.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Search   Contact us   About   Advertise   Forum   RSS Feeds   Statistics   Tools