VideoHelp Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 33
Thread
  1. Hi

    I need to add subtitles to a .mov video, but I can't even play it. Actually, I can only play the sound, but I see no images.

    Is there something I can try before going to get a Mac I donīt know where?


    This is the MediaInfo log for the file:

    General
    Complete name : C:\Users\Valentina\Desktop\DP1_001\DP1_More Than Ever.mov
    Format : MPEG-4
    Format profile : QuickTime
    Codec ID : qt
    File size : 2.43 GiB
    Duration : 9mn 58s
    Overall bit rate mode : Variable
    Overall bit rate : 34.8 Mbps
    Encoded date : UTC 2012-09-12 22:31:16
    Tagged date : UTC 2012-09-12 22:42:32
    Writing library : Apple QuickTime

    Video
    ID : 2
    Format : Intermediate Codec
    Codec ID : icod
    Codec ID/Hint : Apple
    Duration : 9mn 58s
    Bit rate mode : Variable
    Bit rate : 33.3 Mbps
    Width : 1 248 pixels
    Original width : 1 280 pixels
    Height : 702 pixels
    Original height : 720 pixels
    Display aspect ratio : 16:9
    Frame rate mode : Constant
    Frame rate : 23.976 fps
    Scan type : Progressive
    Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 1.584
    Stream size : 2.32 GiB (96%)
    Language : English
    Encoded date : UTC 2012-09-12 22:31:17
    Tagged date : UTC 2012-09-12 22:42:32
    Color primaries : BT.709-2, SMPTE 274M, SMPTE 296M
    Transfer characteristics : BT.709-2, SMPTE 170M, SMPTE 274M, SMPTE 293M, SMPTE 296M
    Matrix coefficients : BT.709-2, SMPTE 274M, SMPTE 296M
    Material_Duration : 903000
    Material_Duration_LastFrame : 304235
    Material_StreamSize : 2489554432
    Material_FrameCount : 14356

    Audio
    ID : 1
    Format : PCM
    Format settings, Endianness : Little
    Format settings, Sign : Signed
    Codec ID : sowt
    Duration : 9mn 58s
    Bit rate mode : Constant
    Bit rate : 1 536 Kbps
    Channel(s) : 2 channels
    Channel positions : Front: L R
    Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
    Bit depth : 16 bits
    Stream size : 110 MiB (4%)
    Language : English
    Encoded date : UTC 2012-09-12 22:31:16
    Tagged date : UTC 2012-09-12 22:42:32
    Quote Quote  
  2. icod = Apple Intermediate Codec. Not possible on a PC. You need a mac
    Quote Quote  
  3. Mmmmm... Terrible news. Thanks so much, poisondeathray.
    Quote Quote  
  4. OK, apparently I have located a Mac from a friend of mine. Now, what is is exactly that I need to do with those 2 .mov files with an icod codec in order to later be able to open them on a Windows system?

    What program do I need to use from the Mac? And how do I need to save it as?

    Thanks!
    Quote Quote  
  5. You need something like fcp, or quicktime pro , or imovie I think can do it too

    You need to encode to something compatible on the PC e.g. h.264 video compression, or mjpeg

    You will lose quality, but if you use enough bitrate, you won't notice it too much
    Quote Quote  
  6. Hey poisondeathray! Are fcp, quicktime pro , or imovie video editors? Do I just need to do a render, like you do in Vegas, for example?

    If I keep all the specs the same do you think I will lose quality? Is there an objective way to say if you lost quality after that other than just looking at the video?

    Thanks!
    Quote Quote  
  7. Originally Posted by Valerc View Post
    Hey poisondeathray! Are fcp, quicktime pro , or imovie video editors? Do I just need to do a render, like you do in Vegas, for example?

    If I keep all the specs the same do you think I will lose quality? Is there an objective way to say if you lost quality after that other than just looking at the video?

    Thanks!

    fcp is a full editor like vegas, quicktime pro is more like a player, imovie is more like a basic editor

    You can't keep the specs the same (the whole point is to re-encode it to something other than AIC / icod)

    The objetive measures would be quality tests like SSIM, PSNR. Or use difference mask (e.g. subtract layers in a compositing application)

    You will lose quality - it's unavoidable - unless you use a lossless codec. For lossy codecs, the higher the bitrate, the less quality you will lose. e.g. if you use something like png in mov or animation codec at full quality , it will be RGB lossless, but the filesize will be huge . You won't notice any loss if you use something like mjpeg quality 100, or h.264 with 20-30Mb/s (you have too go frame by frame and zoom in to see the loss). Those last 2 are what's typically used to transfer to something usable for PC. Another option is dnxhd, but it doesn't support non standard frame sizes (1248x702 is non standard). If you don't mind the filesize, use png in mov or animation codec

    Even if you use a lossless codec, it's only lossles in the same colorspace. There will be very slight losses from doing colorspace conversions . I don't know what AIC uses, I think it's YUV 4:2:0 . So even using lossless RGB you will incur some loss . I wouldn't worry about it. The fact that somebody gave you AIC means they don't care about some quality loss. They would have used something better if they cared (even prores is lossy - but that's what most mac editors would have used, but it's much better than AIC)
    Last edited by poisondeathray; 28th Sep 2012 at 19:51.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Thanks for all that! The original file is 2.5 G, and .mov

    I'm not familiar with lossy codecs.

    What if I use h.264 and keep a high video bitrate? I have a doubt about the bitrate. If the original bitrate I have is like 30 M, then it's pointless to reencode with a bigger bitrate than that. Right? I mean, you can't "create" more quality than what you already have in the original. Right?

    I'm seeing from what I posted at the beginning, that my video bitrate is : 33.3 Mbps.

    If I use that bitrate and h.264 will I be OK?
    Quote Quote  
  9. Originally Posted by Valerc View Post
    Thanks for all that! The original file is 2.5 G, and .mov

    I'm not familiar with lossy codecs.

    What if I use h.264 and keep a high video bitrate? I have a doubt about the bitrate. If the original bitrate I have is like 30 M, then it's pointless to reencode with a bigger bitrate than that. Right? I mean, you can't "create" more quality than what you already have in the original. Right?

    I'm seeing from what I posted at the beginning, that my video bitrate is : 33.3 Mbps.

    If I use that bitrate and h.264 will I be OK?


    Yes, you can't have more quality than the original. But the higher the bitrate, the less loss there is

    Even if you used 10x the bitrate 333Mb/s, it will still be some loss. That's what a lossy encoder does - it throws out data. You can never get the same quality. A lossless encoder can retain the same quality

    You have to decide what is "enough" for your purposes. But using something like 30Mb/s should be more than enough for most goals

    Note I added some comments to the earlier post. The fact that somebody is using AIC means they aren't too worried about quality. So I wouldn't be too concerned either
    Quote Quote  
  10. Wow, your explanation was totally awesome poisondeathray! Thanks SO much.

    This is a video for festivals. Not Cannes or Sundance, but festivals anyways.

    Well, I will try to reencode it with h.264 and 33 M.

    Any other codec just in case h.264 is not available? My friend is a photographer, but has no knowledge of video issues. What if he doesnīt have the necessary codecs for the job?
    Quote Quote  
  11. Originally Posted by Valerc View Post
    Wow, your explanation was totally awesome poisondeathray! Thanks SO much.

    This is a video for festivals. Not Cannes or Sundance, but festivals anyways.

    Well, I will try to reencode it with h.264 and 33 M.

    Any other codec just in case h.264 is not available? My friend is a photographer, but has no knowledge of video issues. What if he doesnīt have the necessary codecs for the job?

    I listed a few options already. If he can use AIC, then he can use h.264 (he must have all the necessary codecs if he could encode to AIC). MJPEG is a 2nd commonly used alternative if for whatever reason he can't
    Quote Quote  
  12. Oh no, this friend of mine is not the one who created the video. I am going to use his Mac because it's the only Mac I have available for this. He has nothing to do with this videos. He's just helping me. So, should I be worried that he doesnīt have the codecs? What can I do?

    But you said that MJPEG would produce a huge file, or am I mistaken?
    Quote Quote  
  13. Originally Posted by Valerc View Post
    Oh no, this friend of mine is not the one who created the video. I am going to use his Mac because it's the only Mac I have available for this. He has nothing to do with this videos. He's just helping me. So, should I be worried that he doesnīt have the codecs? What can I do?

    But you said that MJPEG would produce a huge file, or am I mistaken?

    If he has one of those programs listed above, you can convert it

    MJPEG final size will be based on the quality level you choose. There is a slider that goes up to 100. 100 will produce a larger filesize than , say 95 . It doesn't encode using a given set bitrate, it uses a "quality" level
    Quote Quote  
  14. Mmm... OK.

    But if my original is 2.5 G, should I get a file of the same size as that if I use 100 for the MJPEG codec? It sounds as if it was the case. 100% quality is the quality of the original. Right?
    Quote Quote  
  15. Originally Posted by Valerc View Post
    Mmm... OK.

    But if my original is 2.5 G, should I get a file of the same size as that if I use 100 for the MJPEG codec? It sounds as if it was the case. 100% quality is the quality of the original. Right?
    No, 100% is the highest for MJPEG. It's still a lossy codec

    The filesize will be proprotional to content complexity. If there is lots of detail, noise, the file will be larger. If it was a blank wall, it will be smaller . So it might be larger or smaller than the original. There is no way to tell beforehand

    The filesize is (almost) meaningless - you can't compare between different codecs, encoders or settings. Within the same encoder, settings and codec, then yes you can say the higher the bitrate, the higher the quality
    Quote Quote  
  16. The thing is this: I donīt want to get a file much bigger than 2.5G. I later need to upload it, and it can get really difficult the bigger it is.

    What I downloaded was 2.5G, then I need to add subtitles and upload it again.

    So, is my file going to be much bigger than the original after this little "intervention"?? That really worries me.

    For a given quality, what format is better: .mov, avi, mp4? Which gives you better quality with smaller size?
    Quote Quote  
  17. Originally Posted by Valerc View Post
    The thing is this: I donīt want to get a file much bigger than 2.5G. I later need to upload it, and it can get really difficult the bigger it is.

    What I downloaded was 2.5G, then I need to add subtitles and upload it again.

    So, is my file going to be much bigger than the original after this little "intervention"?? That really worries me.
    filesize = bitrate x running time

    So if you used h.264 and use the same bitrate, it will be the same filesize.

    If you used 1/2 the bitrate it would be 1/2 the filesize (assuming video only)


    For a given quality, what format is better: .mov, avi, mp4? Which gives you better quality with smaller size?
    These are all containers. They don't necessarily indicate anything about the video quality or the compression used

    h.264 will give best compression (so better quality with smaller filesizes)
    Quote Quote  
  18. OK, poisondeathray. That was really clear! That will do, I hope.

    You are really great to explain things. Thatīs not common at all.

    I will be back to tell about my results...

    Thanks so much!!!
    Quote Quote  
  19. OK... Bad news. The mac had imovie HD. However, it wouldnīt play the file. The machine didnīt have the icod, and even though I downloaded it, it refused to be installed. (((
    Quote Quote  
  20. imovie hd is part of iLife and icod (AIC) support should already be there

    If not , download it here
    http://support.apple.com/downloads/Apple_Intermediate_Codec_1_0_1

    If that's the one you already tried, then I have no idea. Try using a different mac or ask someone that has FCP or QT installed . Ask whoever sent this to you to export it in a different format
    Quote Quote  
  21. Hi poisondeathray! Thatīs exactly what I did. I downloaded it from that same page, and when I tried to install it, it gave me a message I donīt exactly remember, but it wouldnīt install it.

    Actually, it was even worse than with a PC, because Quick Time didnīt even open it, and imovie did, but it wouldnīt play any sound or video.
    Quote Quote  
  22. Quicktime on a Mac (it won't work on a PC) requires a different installer

    http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/39040/proapps-quicktime-codecs
    Quote Quote  
  23. Does it mean that I should have installed all this to be able to use it? Mmm...
    Quote Quote  
  24. If you have imovie hd you shouldn't have to install anything. Apple Intermediate Codec comes with it. It converts almost all HD footage to AIC. If something was broken or corrupted then you might have to re-install it

    Maybe your file is corrupted ?
    Quote Quote  
  25. But what do I need to reinstall? Like I said, I tried to install the codec and the system wouldn't let me. And there was another message saying that Quick Time didnīt recognize the file... If it didnīt recognize it, I think the machine didn't have the codec installed. And it didnīt let me install it. So, it's an endless loop.
    Quote Quote  
  26. You shouldn't have to install or do anything

    Mac's are supposed to "just work"

    On a more serious note, AIC comes with imovie. The other programs I listed earlier can open & convert it too (but need AIC installed separately).

    Just ask whoever sent you the file to send you another format that is PC friendly, or try another mac
    Quote Quote  
  27. Yes, I guess I will need to ask for 2 new files. I wanted to try this first, because the videos are 5 G big in total and I downloaded them...
    Thanks so much, poisondeathray.
    Quote Quote  
  28. Just thinking about it now. These downloads you sent me the link for (http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/39040/proapps-quicktime-codecs) say this:

    Requirements
    • Intel
    • Mac OS X 10.5.6 or later
    • QuickTime 7.6 or later
    What if for example his Quick Time version was not this one, but much older. Like I said, he's a photographer and never uses the mac for video-related things.
    Quote Quote  
  29. Even if you upgrade quicktime, you need to "pro" version to be able to convert it (not free) . The regular version is just a player
    http://store.apple.com/ca/product/D3380Z/A/quicktime-7-pro-for-mac-os-x


    AIC comes with imovie hd, since version 5
    Quote Quote  
  30. But I mean it just about the requirements. My question is that maybe I wasnīt able to install the codec yesterday because his software is outdated. In some cases, if the versions are too old maybe there are issues.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!