Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays! or rip iTunes movies!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 59 of 59
Thread
-
Once again - MPEG-2 (H.262) can be edited without transcoding to spatial domain in DCT domain and at the macroblock level it means that macroblocks can be added to already existing structure to extend video from 704 to 720. Don't need to trust me - ask codecs developers or take H.262 spec in a hand and start learning. And laugh is usually good for health. -
-
-
-
I wrote the same when mentioning DVDPatcher.
Btw i verified DVD 704 video patched to 720 and seems it works correctly on HW MPEG-2 decoders made by Broadcom, STM and Intel. -
Guest34343Guest
Requantizing does not add or delete macroblocks! I have never heard of the latter being done. Did you just make it up?
For one thing, the VBV model would break if you added or deleted video data.
It may presumably be theoretically possible to make all the required adjustments and avoid decoding/recoding the existing macroblocks. The fact that no-one has tried to do it in preference to simple re-encoding of the stream should tell us something about its practicality.Last edited by Guest34343; 13th Sep 2012 at 07:27.
-
First - i've provided example that various operation can be performed on DCT and macroblocks without transcoding (people think that this can't be done ) so please neuron2 do not add anything over this, kindly asking You - be fair and not try to put not my words in my mouth,
second - i assume that when re-quantization is performed, VBV model will also change and need to be "rebuild". -
Guest34343Guest
Last edited by Guest34343; 13th Sep 2012 at 09:30.
-
The bad advice is suggesting that the OP should deliberately place incorrect resolution information in the video header in an attempt to force players to treat the encoded video data for every frame as if it were a different resolution than is actually the case.
That theory is based on a foolish assuption that all players have good "error resilience". Hardware players are much less likely than software players to have that, and it appears that the OP will be authoring a Blu-ray disc to watch with his Blu-ray player. The OP even confirmed your cheat didn't work for him in the past.
The cheat won't necessarily work for software either. Windows Media Player is the software player the average person has and will use, but Windows Media Player didn't play the file correctly when I used your cheat. The picture was full of green blocks. The cheat worked for VLC and MPCHC, although all 16 null pixels were tacked onto the right edge of the frame.
Your theoretical ramblings are of no value to the OP or anyone else who needs help with a real-world problem today. There are not any tools that the OP can actually obtain which change the real resolution of video without re-encoding, so what you are suggesting is in fact not possible in the real world today.
I don't write software for encoding or decoding video, but since neuron2 has some experience in this area, I'll take his word that your theories are wrong too.Last edited by usually_quiet; 13th Sep 2012 at 09:28.
-
Guest34343Guest
I didn't say the theory is wrong, just that there is no practical implementation that I know of. That's the point you made as well; theories are not of use to the original poster.
-
And i never mentioned about adding or removing macroblocks for requantization - this what You added - claiming that i make equal sign between requantization and adding macroblocks - i've used requantization as an example of operation that can be performed on H.262 without transcoding from DCT to spatial domain and back - that's all i've write previously.
And macroblocks can be added without transforming from DCT to spatial and back. And yes i agree that probably it is faster to do this in spatial domain and perhaps this is only one way available from average user perspective for today.
If after requantization from for example 8Mbps H.262 stream is reduced to 4Mbps then amount of data remains the same?
So how works requantize or m2vrequantiser if amount of data remains not changed? Or how people downsize DVD9 to DVD5 without changing video data which accordingly to You will change VBV?
I never wiritten any code related to H.262 and i never qeustioned Your knowledge on this area but please explain me how placing macroblock with null (i mean DCT representation of black video) from right side will affect more overall amount video data when compared to requantization from 8 to 4Mbps.
You searching for a truth OK, fine for me but... i will try write this - You extrapolate some claims even if i never write about this like case where i never write that requantization is same transformations like adding macroblocks except fact that both can be performed in the same DCT space without transcoding to spatial and back to DCT. So they can be performed "losslessly" based on fact that we not changing domain - thats all - OK (and requantization is lossy opearation - i will add this to not start new discussion however not due of transcoding from DCT>spatial>DCT), adding information about VBV that need to be addressed when adding macroblocks it is OK and Thank You, but please do not say that i've said that: .
I never wrote that requantization is made by "adding or removing macroblocks" - never.
So this is a reason where i say that in searching for truth You sometimes are unfair mentioning areas even not signaled by me claiming that i wrote something i never wrote - i've said once: perhaps my English is NOK - sorry for that however i don't like fact that i'm blamed for never written thoughts. -
https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/349131-How-to-Losslessy-Re-enode-MPEG2?p=2186362&vi...=1#post2186362
This what i wrote and seems it was to complicated for You to understand. There is a way to increase resolution without re-encoding. I never write that software already exist and is available for free.
Error resilience is practical part of each decent decoder when data can be corrupted or during transfer or when storage medium is partially damaged.
If You expecting only 100% working solutions with warranty, perhaps You should consider buying them in a shop or specialized company?
Be well. -
The OP has a problem and needs a solution that actually exists. He started of this thread to get help, not to hear your theories. If all you have to offer is a theory with no actual implementation available in the real world, you should have kept it to yourself.
Not many members here do understand the underpinnings of video encoding. If you want to engage in a rigorous theoretical discussion go to doom9 with your theory. They do understand this stuff although it appears some members will expect rigorous technical accuracy.Last edited by usually_quiet; 13th Sep 2012 at 10:47.
-
FaeGiN
-
Ask them http://www.sri.com/ - perhaps such software exist perhaps not.
https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/349131-How-to-Losslessy-Re-enode-MPEG2?p=2186362&vi...=1#post2186362
Not reading or reading but without understanding... and seems even to be pride for such skill...
Once again - if You have enough money then i can say that this software exist.
You mean that every one on this forum is like You? I don't think so... Don't be so egocentric.
Be well. -
Guest34343Guest
@pandy
You started making this personal by calling me unfair and saying I put words in your mouth. I did no such thing. And as you now continue with ad-hominems I'll withdraw. You're the winner. -
My reading comprehension is actually very good. Your ability to make the point you are trying to express using English, is not. In spite of that, it has always been clear that the solution you proposed is not in any form that any ordinary person can readily obtain and use. So again, of what practical value is it to the OP?
This isn't a good forum for rigorous theoretical discussions on video encoding. I have been here long enough to see that most members here really are like me, or even less knowldgeable in this area. neuron2 is the only member here with the right background to really discuss of your theory who participated in this thread. There are only a handful of others I know of who might have participated but they didn't. They don't appear to come here for that. From what I have seen, they must go to doom9 or somewhere else if they want to have those kinds of discussions.Last edited by usually_quiet; 13th Sep 2012 at 11:54.
-
Oh please take responsibility for what You wrote - https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/349131-How-to-Losslessy-Re-enode-MPEG2?p=2186595&vi...=1#post2186595
You made this personal not me extrapolating things i never wrote and at the same time accusing me about "make it up" things You've just extrapolated. Or perhaps someone else use Your account ?
I can understand "usually_quiet" but i don't understand person who "search for technical truth". Please stop extrapolating things i've never wrote.
Be well.
I respect Your right to express opinions however i only pointed that making changes in resolution for H.262 is possible based on standard - that's all - suddenly only practical (and in assumption very cheap of free) solutions can be written on this forum, also seems that suddenly You behave like admin deciding what is allowed or not.
Once again - i only expressed fact that it is possible to operate on H.262 without transcoding - i never claimed anything over this. I also proposed practical workarounds and i expressed my opinion after reading draft for BD spec that 720 is a recommendation not mandatory requirement for H.262 (mandatory requirement is compliance with H.262) and perhaps there is no need to transcode anything.
I see no point in further discussion - You don't like me, i don't care about this - just put ignore on me and be well.Last edited by pandy; 13th Sep 2012 at 12:11.
-
No, there is not a "way to increase resolution without re-encoding". Such software does not exist at any price.
If you want to spend a few years study and writing the code to do so, you could change that state of affairs, but until then this is just a complete waste of time. -
-
Guest34343Guest
Coming from a guy that is not a programmer (https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/349131-How-to-Losslessy-Re-enode-MPEG2?p=2186586&vi...=1#post2186586), this takes the cake for bloviation.
-
Since no one is offering $25K, then it still does not exist and probably never will.
When someone posts here asking how to solve a specific problem with a video file, they aren't in the least bit helped by suggesting they commission a research program to create new software that you imagine might be possible. -
-
Just keep digging that hole pandy... Pretty soon everyone will have your name on their ignore list.
-
I've just searching for a "technical truth" - "usually_quiet" wrote that this can't be done without re-encoding - i wrote that it can be done without re-coding. That's all, suddenly i see that "technical truth" is not welcomed unless some VIP decide to participate in discussion... even when VIP says - Ok this can be done but no one do things like this or i don't know anything like this and doing things in that way have no sense for me when we can re-encode... now appear new problem - what is allowed or not, new issue is 25k $ is enough to create a working code...
Be well Guys - it can't be done, 25k $ is not enough for writing such code in country where programmer earns per year 15k $, search for "technical truth" is allowed only for VIP's, "usually_quiet' replaced Baldrick - in 2013 there is end of the world (or maybe in 2012 - i forget but who cares) have a nice time .
from my side EOF
--
I feel ashamed holygamer, please accept my apologies for this OT discussion. (this is honest and not sarcastic). -
-
Did I just make the mistake of trying to help when some kids are just having a schoolboy argument and trying to prove who has the biggest brain or something?
Hehe, oh yes silly me.
Retired from this thread before I make the same mistake twice.FaeGiN -
@FaeGiN, your suggestion was fine.
The other stuff is unfortunately one of the accompanying burdens of internet discourse...
Scott
Similar Threads
-
How to import MPEG2-TS to Adobe Premier? How to convert MPEG2-TS to MKV? :)
By farzad in forum EditingReplies: 19Last Post: 29th Feb 2012, 16:25 -
mpeg2 ts file convert to mkv or mpeg2 ts......change only video bitrate...
By jrblack in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 24th Jan 2011, 18:45 -
Merging MPEG2 stream with its AC3 audio... or converting MKV to MPEG2
By cwt in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 5th May 2010, 14:18 -
MPEG2-->MPEG2 Crop + Resize
By wincrazy in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 26Last Post: 24th Jan 2009, 01:30 -
Simple question: how to compress 4GB mpeg2 to 1GB mpeg2
By jimdagys in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 29Last Post: 3rd Jan 2008, 08:45