+ Reply to Thread
Page 13 of 13
FirstFirst ... 3 11 12 13
Results 361 to 373 of 373
Thread
  1. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: none
    Search Comp PM
    The composite output on your satellite box will always be standard definition. Run the signal directly to your HDTV and you'll see it's SD. Capturing via HDMI with an HDCP stripper should get you HD.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Location: Switzerland
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    The composite output on your satellite box will always be standard definition. Run the signal directly to your HDTV and you'll see it's SD. Capturing via HDMI with an HDCP stripper should get you HD.
    Thanks for your prompt reply jagabo.

    I've read somewhere that even with composite output, higher resolutions can be obtained from HD channels.

    Anyhow, I'll try with HDCP stripper that I've already ordered, thanks to this thread .

    Thanks & Regards,
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: none
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by MounaLafi View Post
    I've read somewhere that even with composite output, higher resolutions can be obtained from HD channels.
    Local downscaling of HD to SD can be slightly sharper and have less artifacts than SD broadcast. But it's nowhere near the original HD.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Location: Switzerland
    Search Comp PM
    I did some research and I found the following:

    What I'm trying to do is connecting Composite A/V Cable (Video Out in my Sat Box) to Component A/V Cable (YCrCb).

    According to the below link:

    Difference Between Composite & Component AV Cable

    Both composite and component cables carry analog signals. The video carried by composite cables is a compressed version of the video carried by component cables. As a result, the video quality of composite video is lower than that of component video.

    Nevertheless, there seems to be a solution using the below device:

    Component to Composite w/Down Scaling

    But I don't know if it worth the try since I'm going to capture using HDMI as soon as my HDCP Stripper arrives, which is much better.

    Edit: Besides, there will be no quality improvement, since the Composite A/V Cable is coming from the source not the other way around.
    Last edited by MounaLafi; 19th Apr 2013 at 06:41.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: none
    Search Comp PM
    Forget the component to composite downscaler. Your satellite box is already doing that (though from a digital frame buffer, not a component signal). You can get decent HDMI cables for the equivalent of about US$5. The difference will be night and day.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Location: Switzerland
    Search Comp PM
    Now I'm able to capture HD Channels using HDMI with a resolution of 1920*1080

    The issue now is that I like to use the scheduler option which is available in WinTV & not available in ShwoBiz.

    The other issue is that I don't see any options to control the bitrate in WinTV unlike ShwoBiz which has this option in Format Settings ----> Video Encoder.

    So, which program I should use.

    Also, I want to know which settings are most convenient to capture with as I want to capture documentaries and cut commercials from them and re-encode later.

    Any suggestions to achieve this.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: Freedonia
    Search Comp PM
    If you want a scheduled recording then you have no choice. You must use WinTV.

    I suggest that you not record to MP4 format as many have reported audio synch problems when doing that. I record to TS format. The other settings really don't matter much and are personal preference. I change the brightness setting on some VHS captures but otherwise the only setting I ever change is bitrate.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: none
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by MounaLafi View Post
    So, which program I should use.
    I used to use a filter graph and rcTvCap along with Windows' Task Scheduler:
    http://blog.arogan.com/2008/06/hauppauge-hd-pvr-model-1212.html
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: Freedonia
    Search Comp PM
    Very interesting, jagabo. I had not heard of any of that before.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: none
    Search Comp PM
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Location: Switzerland
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    Originally Posted by MounaLafi View Post
    So, which program I should use.
    I used to use a filter graph and rcTvCap along with Windows' Task Scheduler:
    http://blog.arogan.com/2008/06/hauppauge-hd-pvr-model-1212.html
    I've already give a try jagabo.

    The issue is that I can't find a similar Video Encoder for Hauppauge Colossus like Hauppauge HD PVR.

    As you can see in the attached jpg the only Video Encoder I've found for Hauppauge Colossus is TS Encoder,
    and the problem that it doesn't have "Virtual Video/Audio In".

    I'm just wondering if anyone used rcTvCap successfully with Hauppauge Colossus or is it just limited to Hauppauge HD PVR?
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Colossus.jpg
Views:	5
Size:	168.4 KB
ID:	17763  

    Quote Quote  
  12. Member
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: Freedonia
    Search Comp PM
    I had no idea that what jagabo is doing was even possible, but I personally find the graphing system cumbersome to use. I haven't done that in a very long time. Of course, others may not feel that it is cumbersome to use at all.

    The Colossus and the HD PVR family of devices use exactly the same encoding chip so if it works on one, it should work on the others.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: none
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jman98 View Post
    I personally find the graphing system cumbersome to use.
    You only have to do it once. Then you save the graph.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Search   Contact us   About   Advertise   Forum   RSS Feeds   Statistics   Tools