VideoHelp.com Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 17 of 17
Thread
  1. It seems like most budget Digital Camcorder takes bad quality video in low light. Are there any HD Camcoder that has good capture in low light? Maybe one with Light adapter options? I've been youtubing to see all the reviews of certain HD camcorders.

    Major needs:
    Good low light quality.
    Fast focus.
    Good stablizer, less shakes.

    I like to have one for $200 but max is $500.
    If anyone has any ideas or suggestion, please reply.
    Athlon II X2 2.9Ghz
    4G ram, 500HD, Dual Boot Win7_64 & XP3_32, ATI HDTV WONDER
    Quote Quote  

  2. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2004
    Location: Northern California, USA
    Why do you need high definition in low light?

    Lower resolution sensors capture more photons per pixel for given optics and and sensor size.

    This translates to more signal to noise.
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  

  3. Member MJA's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2005
    Location: IL
    Originally Posted by NautTboy
    I like to have one for $200 but max is $500.
    If anyone has any ideas or suggestion, please reply.
    good luck
    Quote Quote  

  4. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2004
    Location: Northern California, USA
    Originally Posted by MJA
    Originally Posted by NautTboy
    I like to have one for $200 but max is $500.
    If anyone has any ideas or suggestion, please reply.
    good luck
    Ever notice the noisy HD video on Palladia HD (MTV, VH1, CMT cable channel)? The night concerts suck even though they use heavy lighting and usually $30-65 thousand dollar Sony cameras that weigh a half ton (ok ten pounds).
    http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/cat-bro.../cat-hdstudio/

    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  

  5. Member
    Join Date: Jan 2004
    Location: UK
    Panasonic FZ35 (FZ38 in Europe).
    Reasonable size CCD sensor (none of this 'rolling shutter' CMOS rubbish! ) -so reasonable 'low light' footage.
    AVCHD 'Lite' 720p video - reasonable quality -- good price.
    Downside? -'DSLR' type camera format. Not a problem for me, but some folk aren't keen!
    Quote Quote  

  6. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2004
    Location: Northern California, USA
    Originally Posted by pippas
    Panasonic FZ35 (FZ38 in Europe).
    Reasonable size CCD sensor (none of this 'rolling shutter' CMOS rubbish! ) -so reasonable 'low light' footage.
    AVCHD 'Lite' 720p video - reasonable quality -- good price.
    Downside? -'DSLR' type camera format. Not a problem for me, but some folk aren't keen!
    DSLR's have larger sensors (this one 0.5 inch) and better optics but only part of the sensor is used for video. The packaging requires a tripod for steady video. 30 fps will still be jerky for pan or zoom.
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  

  7. Athlon II X2 2.9Ghz
    4G ram, 500HD, Dual Boot Win7_64 & XP3_32, ATI HDTV WONDER
    Quote Quote  

  8. Originally Posted by edDV
    Why do you need high definition in low light?

    Lower resolution sensors capture more photons per pixel for given optics and and sensor size.

    This translates to more signal to noise.
    Common now dont be laffing yet.
    Well, I want to be able to capture my 8 months boy at any time with atleast 720 resolution. Most of the time inside the house during the winter there's not much light.

    Hmmm, should i just throw him outside in the snow where it's bright and let him do his new crawl in the snow?
    Oh wait, let me get a 10 hologen lamps and set around him so it's nice and bright.

    Now, you guy get what I mean.

    I have JVC miniDV which I like alot, but it went out on me. Even that JVC, sux in low light. I had to adjust brightness in editing.
    Athlon II X2 2.9Ghz
    4G ram, 500HD, Dual Boot Win7_64 & XP3_32, ATI HDTV WONDER
    Quote Quote  

  9. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2004
    Location: Northern California, USA
    At your price range, you will need to use a lot of light or have a noisy picture. Noisy video won't encode well.

    So turn on some lights when you shoot indoors. The more light the better.
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  

  10. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2003
    Location: Want my advice? PM me.
    Get a Canon ZR series machine: http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.ht...reative=390957

    Those work nicely in low light. Canon did a good job there.
    Yes, that includes single-CCD models (3-CCD not needed).
    Quote Quote  

  11. Member
    Join Date: Jan 2004
    Location: UK
    Originally Posted by edDV
    DSLR's have larger sensors (this one 0.5 inch) and better optics but only part of the sensor is used for video. The packaging requires a tripod for steady video. 30 fps will still be jerky for pan or zoom.
    This camera uses the OIS even for movie mode, and if it's half as good as the OIS on my Panasonic AVCHD camera, it's going to make a significant difference.

    It's getting to be more and more difficult to find a 'consumer' camera/camcorder that doesn't use a CMOS sensor, with all the 'rolling shutter' problems that can bring.
    So to find a reasonably priced camera that has a decent sized CCD, and an OIS, and can take 720p AVCHD 'lite' footage with reasonable low light capability has surely got to be a candidate for the OP to consider?
    Quote Quote  

  12. Member MJA's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2005
    Location: IL
    Originally Posted by NautTboy
    Originally Posted by edDV
    Why do you need high definition in low light?

    Lower resolution sensors capture more photons per pixel for given optics and and sensor size.

    This translates to more signal to noise.
    Common now dont be laffing yet.
    Well, I want to be able to capture my 8 months boy at any time with atleast 720 resolution. Most of the time inside the house during the winter there's not much light.

    Hmmm, should i just throw him outside in the snow where it's bright and let him do his new crawl in the snow?
    Oh wait, let me get a 10 hologen lamps and set around him so it's nice and bright.

    Now, you guy get what I mean.

    I have JVC miniDV which I like alot, but it went out on me. Even that JVC, sux in low light. I had to adjust brightness in editing.
    if it's for your kids it's worth spending few hundred more for a nice HD camera.

    Canon VIXIA HV40 HD HDV .it shoots in both HD,and SD.

    http://www.amazon.com/Canon-VIXIA-HV...2183878&sr=8-2

    there is a huge forum for this camera

    http://www.hv20.com/

    you have to remember budget cameras sux in low light
    Quote Quote  

  13. Member Soopafresh's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2004
    Location: United States
    You're going to have noise any way you slice it, especially with your budget. There's a VirtualDub plugin called Camcorder Color Denoiser which will remove some of the colored grain you're going to get. Or several of these http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/10139879 . And http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYAt7...eature=related Just be careful and take precautions.
    "Quality is cool, but don't forget... Content is King!"
    Quote Quote  

  14. Originally Posted by lordsmurf
    Get a Canon ZR series machine: http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.ht...reative=390957

    Those work nicely in low light. Canon did a good job there.
    Yes, that includes single-CCD models (3-CCD not needed).
    Thanks for all the positive comments

    Smurf, I had JVC miniDV and I'm trying to get away from the CASSETTE TAPE.

    Anyone know if there's any differences betweent the HDD vs SDHC camcorder as in quality? I'm assuming the same.
    Athlon II X2 2.9Ghz
    4G ram, 500HD, Dual Boot Win7_64 & XP3_32, ATI HDTV WONDER
    Quote Quote  

  15. Member MJA's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2005
    Location: IL
    I think the tape is better for storage .never trust a hard drive .they end up failing if it's after a day or 5 years

    that's one of the reasons why I decided to buy the HV20

    easy to edit
    Quote Quote  

  16. What you guys think of JVC Everio GZ-MS120?
    It's not HD I don't think because they did specify.
    Check youtube test video, it's pretty clear.
    They are same price or hight than some HD cam.
    So what are its actual resolution? Walley World
    description only say 800kpix.

    True, it's DVD (NTSC 720X480) resolution?
    Athlon II X2 2.9Ghz
    4G ram, 500HD, Dual Boot Win7_64 & XP3_32, ATI HDTV WONDER
    Quote Quote  

  17. I dont really like Hard Disk myself. I prefer Flash memory. In case the cam broke, I can use it with other products. As is right now, my cam broke and I have no way of playing the cassette tape.

    Originally Posted by MJA
    I think the tape is better for storage .never trust a hard drive .they end up failing if it's after a day or 5 years

    that's one of the reasons why I decided to buy the HV20

    easy to edit
    Athlon II X2 2.9Ghz
    4G ram, 500HD, Dual Boot Win7_64 & XP3_32, ATI HDTV WONDER
    Quote Quote  




Similar Threads

  1. Video editors for up to 200 bucks?
    By Sebastian2011 in forum Editing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12th Jan 2012, 08:13
  2. Time for an HD cam.. Last cam was Pana. DVC80.. Next will be?
    By sdsumike619 in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD)
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 25th Nov 2011, 18:35
  3. How to increase when TC OR CAM DVD to Tc or Cam rip
    By antonymaheshca in forum Newbie / General discussions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12th Dec 2010, 13:42
  4. safe few bucks from my pocket
    By mrdin2005 in forum Video Streaming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20th Jul 2009, 04:26
  5. Best HDTV for 200 bucks??
    By sandman423 in forum DVB / HDTV
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 29th May 2009, 13:23
Search   Contact us   About   Advertise   Forum   RSS Feeds   Statistics   Tools