VideoHelp.com Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Cuda decoding

Thread
  1. Member
    Join Date: Feb 2009
    Location: United States
    Ok,

    So far from what i have read is that the geforce 8800's are not supported by most encoders for gpu acceleration. I have read up on a program called badaboom v1.1.1 that supports most all cuda products, the 8800's included. it also outputs to mp4, also no 5.1... boring... well my question is if it does "accelerate" the encoding significantly from my other method (xvid4psp), can i just demux the video from the mp4 container, and remux the video with ac3/dts? If not, is there any other program that will encode using the 8800 gpu? I just keep hearing good things about gpu support with encoding video files faster, particularly h.264. 18-24 hours just can be too long for me on a q6600 2.4, vista-32, 4gb ram, 500sata, 8800gts (512).

    Thanks

    ~b33rman
    Quote Quote  

  2. Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2004
    Location: Miskatonic U
    Check Badaboom very carefully, as the initial release at least supported only a few basic encoding profiles, which might speed up encoding for an iPod or AppleTV, but not for anything that can play quality video. There is also some question over just how much of a gain you get using the GPU when comparing to an encoder that can make full use of a Quad Core processor.
    Read my blogs here and here. Change England's Libel Laws - Sign Here
    Quote Quote  

  3. Member Soopafresh's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2004
    Location: United States
    Supported cards:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUDA

    Install a CUDA compatible driver:

    http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_get.html
    Quote Quote  

  4. Member
    Join Date: Sep 2007
    Location: Canada
    It doesn't accelerate xvid4psp or any front end based on x264. It uses it's own encoder, and doesn't integrate with existing software

    Low quality encoder, search for some screenshots and reviews there are quite a few. The latest release has some improvments - it offers main profile instead of just baseline (It still doesn't offer high). When using similar quality settings, it's actually slower than x264 on a quadcore.

    If you don't care about quality, or only use low quality devices like ipod or other portable devices, it will be fine - that was it's intended target anyway.
    Quote Quote  

  5. Member
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: none
    Here's a recent review with a few benchmarks: http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=3475

    The fastest graphics cards were able to slightly outperform a quad core I7 CPU. 9500 and 9800 cards were slower.

    Another review: http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...2337057,00.asp
    Quote Quote  




Similar Threads

  1. Taking advantage of CUDA
    By Danneauxsvh in forum Video Conversion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 14th Oct 2011, 04:31
  2. Tmpgenc VMW5 and CUDA
    By nikgelfi in forum Video Conversion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 4th Sep 2011, 04:16
  3. CUDA don't work, why?
    By lovelylisa in forum Video Conversion
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 24th Jun 2011, 16:19
  4. nvidia announces cuda 4.0
    By deadrats in forum Computer
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28th Feb 2011, 16:37
  5. Cuda Encoding Feedback: Anybody?
    By themaster1 in forum Video Conversion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 9th Dec 2009, 12:09
Search   Contact us   About   Advertise   Forum   RSS Feeds   Statistics   Tools