Hello All,
I am new to the board and may be asking a question that has been asked before. I did some searches before posting so please don't flame me. The reality is this is a HUGE message board and difficult to find the answer(s) you are looking for.
I am capturing video from my PC monitor using FRAPS at 30 fps and saving it as an uncompressed .AVI file so I do not lose any quality. The video is being captured from a 720x480 pixel window. This is because I want to export the video onto a DVD-R and I don't want to lose any quality downsizing.
I have tried Adobe Premiere Pro 7 and Cyberlink Power Director 5 thus far, but the problem is the MPEG2 codecs that come with the program compress and cause the resulting DVD video to look crappy (i.e., the lines are not as crisp and clear, resulting artifacts occur, objects don't move smoothly but jitter somewhat across the screen, colors are not as vibrate but appear washed out).
Is there a better way to do this? A step-by-step process, including what tools to use, would be appreciated.
I simply want the video on the DVD to look exactly like it does in the uncompressed .AVI file.
Also, the next step would be to capture the video at a higher resolution and the save it to a BD-R. I know I'll need a Blu-Ray burner and associated media, but what I am not sure of is what resolution HD/Blu-Ray is? In other words, instead of capturing at 720x480, what would I capture at? My monitor can display 2560x1600.
Thanks in advance for your help. I respect the vast expertise of the members on this board. Please remember too that eveyone was once a newbie.
Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays! or rip iTunes movies!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 16 of 16
Thread
-
-
you might try upping the fraps setting a little. go full sized 720x480 at 60fps. there shouldn't be much loss of quality going to 720x480 mpeg-2 30i that way. blu-ray hd is 1920x1080 which is above what is allowed in fraps.
cce, mainconcept, tmpgenc, procoder, henc, etc. are all other encoders you might try.
convertxtodvd is pretty good at making usable dvds from weird sources like the fraps codec.--
"a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303 -
1.
How many minutes are you trying to squeeze in on a DVD?
What settings are you using?
You should be able to get very good quality if you use high bitrates(6-8MBit/s) and you can then fit around 1 hour on single layer DVD. You could also try other mpeg2/dvd converters and compare like the very good hcenc.
2.
Read www.videohelp.com/hd#tech , you can use up 1920x1080p with blu-ray video. -
Originally Posted by aedipuss
Originally Posted by Baldrick
As far as settings, are you referring to FRAPS? I am using full size, 30 fps.
If you're referring to the codec in Premier Pro, I tried both the NTSC DV High Quality 7Mb CBR 1 Pass setting as well as the NTSC DV High Quality 4Mb VBR 2 Pass setting.
In Power Director, I just used the High Quality setting for DVD burn. I don't remember it giving me many choices, so I chose the best available.
Any suggested programs for transcoding to DVD other than Premier Pro or Power Director? Something that will use uncompressed .AVI files as input? -
1 hour of dvd mpeg-2 can be encoded at 8000kbps and keep the filesize under 4.3gb.
the film machine is another choice to try.--
"a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303 -
Originally Posted by aedipuss
As for the FRAPS setting of 60FPS, my PC can't capture at that rate. I can only get 40-45 FPS. It's a Pentium 4 that runs about 3.2Ghz with 2 GB DDR2 RAM. My hard drive is a Raptor, which should be fast enough. I'm hoping to do this without investing in more hardware. -
Be aware that MPEG uses 4:2:0 subsampling for the image data. This means the gray scale image is saved at 720x480 but the color information is stored at only 360x240. So colored text (or other small details) will look much worse than b/w text -- especially with colors of similar luminance:
The original color text was as sharp as the b/w text. This is after conversion from 4:4:4 RGB to 4:2:0 YUV but without any MPEG compression or low pass filtering that a DVD Player would apply. -
Originally Posted by blazin-j
ok. set fraps at 29.97 720x480 and encode to mpeg-2 at 9000kbps. give some thought to trying some of the other encoders. cce being about the best, then mainconcept and procoder, with the rest - tmpgenc, henc, etc as ok. my opinions only of course.
vegas pro 8 may still have a 30 day trial, it uses the mainconcept mpeg-2 encoder and would be a good choice, but it's expensive. convertxtodvd has a free trial w/watermark, does surprisingly well and is fairly cheap.--
"a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303 -
Originally Posted by jagabo
Aedipuss, thanks for the tips. I'll have to try these programs and encoders out and see which tests produce the best results. -
Originally Posted by blazin-j
Some things you can do:
Make sure any text is well antialiased. If necessary, capture at a larger resolution and downsize. This may give you better antialiasing.
Make sure there is a lot of luma contrast between text and the background. If possible, use white text on a black background or vice versa.
Use fonts without serifs. Those tiny little serifs will flicker on SD TV.
Capture at 23.976 fps and encode progressive with 3:2 pulldown flags. Don't capture at 29.97 fps and encode interlaced (to do so further blurs the color channels).
Use sufficient bitrate to avoid loss of small detail.
Don't have too much stuff moving around or changing brightness and colors. One of MPEG's most powerful tools is to only encode the changes from frame to frame. Parts of the frame that don't change consume almost no bitrate. If everything is changing the video will require a lot of bitrate.
That also means you want low noise captures. That probably isn't a problem for your screen caps on a computer. If your source is low noise, don't use a spatial noise reduction filter. -
Jagabo, thanks for sharing your wisdom and experience. I did have one question, however.
Originally Posted by Jagabo
Finally, is it better to encode progressive vs interlaced? Will the viewer will have to have a progressive scan DVD player if I encode progressive? -
Originally Posted by blazin-j
Normal video doesn't have such sharp detail so the difference is less visible. Here's a web site that discusses the old DVD chroma upsampling error. They also talk about this fundamental problem with interlaced MPEG encoding with 4:2:0 subsampling. See the "4:2:0 Interlaced: Fundamentally Broken" section.
http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volume_8_2/dvd-benchmark-special-report-chroma-bug-4-2001.html
Originally Posted by blazin-j
Originally Posted by blazin-j -
Thanks again, Jagabo. The examples you provide are compelling and this is making a lot of sense to me, but I still have a few remaining questions.
Originally Posted by Jagabo
Question: How do I know if the original video captured by FRAPS on my flat panel is interlaced or progressively scanned? When I think of interlaced, I usually think of tube TVs that used phosphor screens. But if you have a computer flat panel monitor, can I assume it is progressive?
Originally Posted by Jagabo
Any extra clarity you could provide would be greatly appreciated.
Just keep in mind that the video I am capturing is highly dynamic, not static, and I want the resulting DVD to display the best possible quality; that is, smooth, clear, crisp, vibrant colors and text. Compressibility and filesize are not important considerations to this particular project. -
Originally Posted by blazin-j
Originally Posted by blazin-j
One thing I'm not sure about is whether 29.97 fps progressively encoded MPEG2 is legal for DVD. And if not, if it becomes legal if you use DgIndex to apply 2:2 pulldown flags. -
Originally Posted by Jagabo
Originally Posted by Jagabo
Different question: Does the monitor you are using make any difference in the capture? For example, would a CRT monitor capture look different from a flat panel capture? Or is it capturing from the video card and the monitor you use to view irrelevant to capture quality? -
Originally Posted by blazin-j
Originally Posted by blazin-j
Note that analog NTSC video is always transmitted as 59.94 fields per second. One field at a time is transmitted down the wire or over the air. When you watch on a interlaced display you see one field at a time. Frames don't exist until that video is digitized and pairs of fields are woven together. At that point you have 29.97 fps interlaced video.
DVD players can be rather dumb devices. They don't know how to convert 23.976 fps progressive frames to 59.94 fields per second. 3:2 pulldown flags are instructions added to the video stream that tell them how to produce the requisite 59.94 fields per second.
Someone discovered that it's possible to use other pulldown patterns and these playback properly on most DVD players. For example, 25 fps video can have 3:2:3:2:2 pulldown flags to create 59.94 fields per second. 20 fps video can use 3:3 pulldown flags. The program written to add these unusual flag patterns is called DgPulldown. So, if 29.97 fps progressive isn't officially supported by the DVD spec, you could add 2:2 pulldown flags with DgPulldown.
Originally Posted by blazin-j
Similar Threads
-
Blu Ray and burning a Data Disc...not a Video Disc
By Moontrash in forum DVD & Blu-ray WritersReplies: 16Last Post: 16th Dec 2019, 23:18 -
Can you put DVD quality (and structure) video on a Blu-Ray disc?
By rayden54 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 2Last Post: 20th Jul 2011, 03:17 -
Blu-ray 25G disc. Movie only quality 75% ?
By jlm86 in forum Blu-ray RippingReplies: 8Last Post: 30th Jan 2011, 15:10 -
Introducing Ray in Blu Rendr - Digital Media Receiver Blu-ray Disc
By rayinblu in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 6Last Post: 15th Apr 2010, 10:37 -
Can I rip Blu Ray Discs with LG Super Multi Blu-ray Disc and HD DVD-ROM Dri
By donpato in forum Blu-ray RippingReplies: 5Last Post: 5th May 2008, 17:05