VideoHelp Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
Thread
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I have a music video that looks great on DVD and on my computer, but once I upload it to different online servers, the picture quality is reduced DRAMATICALLY, as in it becomes grainy and pixilated. This has happened on myspace and on these two sites:

    Click on the video tab to view.
    http://www.sonicbids.com/epk/epk.asp?epk_id=97531

    It's the video titled "Temple Party." Artist Abai.
    http://thedolab.com/AN_07spring.html

    We are starting to submit this video in online music video competitions and we need it to be showcased in its highest quality even when we have to reduce the size to fit specifications!

    Thanks much for any help you can provide. Let me know what other details you need for assessment.

    Kalla B
    Quote Quote  
  2. I'm a MEGA Super Moderator Baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Sweden
    Search Comp PM
    Most video sites are using very low video bitrate/file size and that will make the video look like crap. I would use http://stage6.divx.com , better quality than most but then it requires that you install another plugin for your webbrowser. Or convert to wmv,flash video yourself and host on your own site.
    Quote Quote  
  3. VH Wanderer Ai Haibara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Somewhere on VideoHelp...
    Search Comp PM
    Plus, most of the online video-hosting sites probably re-encode anything you post, so that may well be an unavoidable additional hit on quality. Baldrick's mention of hosting it yourself is a good idea, if you want to maintain absolute control over the quality - but then bandwidth concerns come into play.
    If cameras add ten pounds, why would people want to eat them?
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    you can't

    instead host it your self, on your own website, and you can any size quality you want , limited only by the bandwidth limits of your HOST
    Quote Quote  
  5. I had this exact same question a few weeks ago and I agree with thewizard: they all suck. The best I could do is with www.imeem.com
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks so much for these suggestions! I will look into these options this week! If anyone has any more, feel free to post away. Thanks again!

    Best,

    K
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member thecoalman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Search PM
    One thing i have never understood is why for those that have a knowledge of video they don't provide a set a specifications that would insure it doesn't get reencoded. It's a win-win situtation, it's beneficial to them because they don't have to devote the processing power and the user gets his video online untouched. Considering there's something like 70,000 videos uploaded to youtube a day the costs must be enormous. I'd imagine you could power a small town with the electricity they use for encoding alone.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    its BANDWIDTH control, videos with higher specs and bigger sizes take a longer time to reach the viewer and use more of the available bandwidth during the DL.

    by controling the RES and the quality they control the time and the display area on your screen, so they can have there adv space.

    a larger video res, would take up more display area, and reduce the adv displayed in front of your face
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member thecoalman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Search PM
    theewizard I'm aware of the resons for why they reencode but I think you're missing my point. If they provided a set of specs that was suitable to them then you could just encode the video yourself, teaking it to provide the best quality instead of a one size fits all.
    Quote Quote  
  10. I just make my videos so that they are small & look great. They don't reecode your stuff much if it's already at or near their specs. Once I started doing this my videos look about the same on youtube as they do on my computer.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    There's a recent thread at ArsTechnica where they talk about GooTube's encoding. There are changes in the works. About halfway down that thread there's a post by GiantRobot who seems to know the score (although I can't vouch for him).

    He says if your video is encoded H.263 (with a low enough bitrate) and the audio is mp3 then GooTube will just repackage it into an FLV container without re-encoding anything. What constitutes "low enough bitrate" is the question.
    Quote Quote  
  12. On the front page YT usually has a high resolution video or two. Makes you think that yours is going to be as nice.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Hey, everybody!

    Thanks so much for all the great suggestions!

    We did the Zamzar thing and it worked out okay. Not great, but decent enough for now. We'll explore other options now that we have more time. We were under a deadline before with the music video competition looming. It's all in! The managing director of the contest really likes the video! Yay!

    It's not 100% clean, but it's WAY better than it was before! For sure we're going to set up our own website to screen it and for downloads, etc.

    Thanks again for being so generous with your knowledge. It's SO great to know this forum exists!!!! Hey, if we win the contest I'll let you guys know!!!

    Kalla B
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!