VideoHelp Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 40
Thread
  1. Thought some people here would like to use this:
    http://www.stevethomson.ca/vi/



    Cheers
    Quote Quote  
  2. Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic U
    Search Comp PM
    Look interesting. Going to have a play.

    Thanks
    Read my blog here.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Just to clarify, my original post might've implied I made it but I didnt!
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member daamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    Search Comp PM
    @ mrtunes: Looks like an interesting find. Have you submitted it as a new tool (if it's not there already)?

    www.videohelp.com/toolsedit.php?newtool=1
    There is some corner of a foreign field that is forever England: Telstra Stadium, Sydney, 22/11/2003.

    Carpe diem.

    If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.
    Quote Quote  
  5. hey no I didn't, I'll do that now. I haven't tried it cause I don't have a 5.1 mixing setup here so someone let me know how it is!
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    haven't produced anything with it, but playing around after reading your post (Thanks) seems to work OK in Vegas. And it seems less hassle then doing the same thing natively in Vegas as well. Have to actually do something with it to make any quality judgements though -- all I can say right now is I got 6 wav files out.
    Quote Quote  
  7. If s.o. is looking for some guides:
    http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=83752
    Especialy this one looks very interesting:
    http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=105684
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member dipstick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Dark side of the Moon
    Search Comp PM
    It does work!

    I used it in conjuntion with Kristal Audio Engine to create the tracks. Kristal Audio Engine is FREE, so their is no excuse not try it out. You really need to pay attention to the sound levels, because it's easy to get clipping when combining all the tracks. You still need an AC3 encoder that lets you import the tracks and combines them into 5.1 AC3.

    I played the resulting 5.1 AC3 in PowerDVD and it reported that it was 5.1 Dolby Digital. I'm not sure if it really sounds better, because I don't have 5.1 Audio card. I guess I'll have to compile an entire Album onto a Music DVD to test it out. It takes some work for every song, so only my favorate music collection will get the treatment. Time to break out Led Zep.
    I stand up next a mountain and chop it down with the ledge of my hand........ I'm a Voodoo child.... Jimi Hendrix,
    Quote Quote  
  9. If you want to get PowerDVD or whatever to report the AC3 as 5.1, all you need to do is edit the tag in the .ifo file. That is probably all this software does anyway.

    There is no way to convert 2 channel stereo into legitimate 5.1 surround . . . hate to burst the bubble, but it can't be done.
    "Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die."
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member dipstick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Dark side of the Moon
    Search Comp PM
    Nobody said it is True 5.1 Suround from Stereo.

    What it does, is split up the 2 channels into 6 channels to simulate 5.1 Suround. You end up with 6 channels that you can encode to 5.1 AC3. It allows you to adjust the sound characteristics of the FLFR - LFRE - SLSR to create a simulated 5.1 Suround Sound.
    I stand up next a mountain and chop it down with the ledge of my hand........ I'm a Voodoo child.... Jimi Hendrix,
    Quote Quote  
  11. all you need to do is edit the tag in the .ifo file.
    I think dipstick played the ac3 FILE, not DVD.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Originally Posted by dipstick
    IIt takes some work for every song, so only my favorate music collection will get the treatment. Time to break out Led Zep.
    Hi, I'm the guy who created V.I. Actually I used a lot of Led Zep material when testing and trying the different settings to come up with it. Try Black Country Woman or Gallow Pole through V.I. They jump right out of the speakers and truly come to life!

    You're right about the risk of clipping. That's why I keep repeating throughout the guides I've written that limiting is essential for outputs of these conversions. It is very easy to get "overly enthusiastic" with the controls. Plus, the process of extracting ambience sometimes removes phase cancellations that eliminated peaks in the original stereo track.

    Tell me, with Kristal (great prog, by the way), did you run three passes to get the files to disk? I did a guide for doing the same thing with Foobar, and the advantage is that you don't need to run them in real time. This can be much faster than recording an audio file three times at normal playback speed. It's not so bad for individual songs but downright painful for a movie soundtrack!

    Regards,
    Steve.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Ahhh cool! I was going to send you an email from your website to notify you that you've got some publicity here but you beat me to it, good man Steve.
    Quote Quote  
  14. Originally Posted by dipstick
    Nobody said it is True 5.1 Suround from Stereo.

    What it does, is split up the 2 channels into 6 channels to simulate 5.1 Suround. You end up with 6 channels that you can encode to 5.1 AC3. It allows you to adjust the sound characteristics of the FLFR - LFRE - SLSR to create a simulated 5.1 Suround Sound.
    Actually, it all depends on how we define "true 5.1 surround." Very little of what's commercially available in 5.1 was actually recorded with 5 microphones and then the lowest frequencies filtered to form the .1 channel. If a recording engineer points a microphone at a sound source, records it then pans the track to a surround channel in a 5.1 setup, does that make it true surround? What if it's a stereo microphone and he pans it to both surround channels? I've read discussions on pro forums among engineers who talk about how the like to set up digital reverb for 5.1 mixes. Many take a sound and use a 5.1 panner to place it near the front and then use a small reverb for the front channels with a big reverb for the back. Is this true 5.1 surround? What about 5.1 remixes of classic albums for DVD-A such as Fleetwood Mac's Rumours, etc. Heck, the 5.1 release of the Beach Boys Pet Sounds can't be "true 5.1" because the album was recorded in mono!!!

    If all of the above--which are common practices on commercial 5.1 recordings and movie soundtracks--constitute true 5.1 surround to many people, then so does taking a stereo recording and using an effects plugin to pan it among 5.1 channels! So yes, you can take stereo and turn it into legitimate 5.1. It won't be the same as using a 5-channel microphone to recorded discrete tracks, or an ambisonic microphone to capture the 4 tracks required for it (including height info). The only valid difference I see is that taking a stereo mix and converting it to surround is not as easy because the various sounds are already mixed together. It's easier when one has a multitrack source file and then the various individual sounds can be placed anywhere around the listener.

    Maybe what makes this less legit in some people's eyes is that it's being done at home on a computer instead of in a studio, even though in a sense it's exactly the same thing, applying digital effects to create a sound field distributed among 5.1 speakers.

    In the end, if it sounds good, enjoy it! I think if you play around with V.I and get the right combination of source file and levels, you're going to be astounded with the quality of surround that's possible.

    Regards,
    Steve.
    Quote Quote  
  15. Originally Posted by mrtunes
    Ahhh cool! I was going to send you an email from your website to notify you that you've got some publicity here but you beat me to it, good man Steve.
    Hehe thanks anyway! I saw the referring address in my web site provider's stats. It was either this or a Brazilian forum where V.I was discussed. My Portuguese sucks so here I am. Doom9 was V.I's nursery so there are a few threads over there too. Glad to be here too though. This site has been tremendous for video issues. I just haven't really checked out the forum before.

    S.
    Quote Quote  
  16. Originally Posted by stevethomson
    Originally Posted by mrtunes
    Ahhh cool! I was going to send you an email from your website to notify you that you've got some publicity here but you beat me to it, good man Steve.
    Hehe thanks anyway! I saw the referring address in my web site provider's stats. It was either this or a Brazilian forum where V.I was discussed. My Portuguese sucks so here I am. Doom9 was V.I's nursery so there are a few threads over there too. Glad to be here too though. This site has been tremendous for video issues. I just haven't really checked out the forum before.

    S.
    LOL yeah it's not easy picking up new languages just to discuss your new plugins. I originally found out about the plugin on KVRAudio.com although there's no discussion about it to my knowledge since most users there aren't into 5.1 mixing. What's your background that led you to make this toolset? Are you a film mixer? I didn't know Synthedit is capable of mult-channel plugins.

    And yes this site is fantastic, it's been of great help to me and the forum is top notch. That's why when something like this grabs my attention it's my duty to notify people here about it.
    Quote Quote  
  17. Member dipstick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Dark side of the Moon
    Search Comp PM
    stevethomson wrote
    Tell me, with Kristal (great prog, by the way), did you run three passes to get the files to disk? I did a guide for doing the same thing with Foobar, and the advantage is that you don't need to run them in real time. This can be much faster than recording an audio file three times at normal playback speed. It's not so bad for individual songs but downright painful for a movie soundtrack!
    I imported 3 instances of the song into the Waver. I then used the Mixer to apply your effects to each wav file, one effect for each. This is where you can adjust the levels to keep them from clipping. Once that was done, I went back to the Waver and exported each one seperately. So the short answer is yes, it took 3 passes.

    I think you created a great tool and can't wait to see what "Whole Lotta Love" sounds like in 5.1 surround. That song was meant for 5.1 surround sound.

    Thank's for the great tool!
    I stand up next a mountain and chop it down with the ledge of my hand........ I'm a Voodoo child.... Jimi Hendrix,
    Quote Quote  
  18. Originally Posted by mrtunes
    Are you a film mixer? I didn't know Synthedit is capable of mult-channel plugins.
    No I'm actually a tech writer by profession. I just really love music and audio/video technology. I started playing around with a tremendous audio program called Plogue Bidule (www.plogue.com) and this led to experiments in surround sound. V.I has been around in Beta versions on the Doom9 forum since Nov. 2004 actually. I just never got around to implementing a couple of ideas and wrapping it all into a "releasable" state until last month.

    Synthedit supports multichannel IO if you register it. It seemed like a good investment of very few dollars (as is Plogue Bidule, by the way).
    Quote Quote  
  19. Originally Posted by dipstick
    I think you created a great tool and can't wait to see what "Whole Lotta Love" sounds like in 5.1 surround. That song was meant for 5.1 surround sound.

    Thank's for the great tool!
    You're very welcome. Yeah WLL through V.I can be pretty spectacular. The middle section really gives a sense that it's rotating all around you.

    I really wish Kristal would add a multichannel bus. It's a tremendous program as is but that would make it even better. As for avoiding clipping, I highly recommend Kjaerhus's Classic Master Limiter. You can add it to the master output section of Kristal or in the second effect slot. You could also put it on the master section then add reverb on the surrounds, perhaps the freeware SIR convolution reverb with some high-quality free impulses from www.noisevault.com. There's one 24-bit set there recorded at the Concertgebouw. They sound tremendous.
    Quote Quote  
  20. Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic U
    Search Comp PM
    If anyone is interested, I have just posted a guide to using V.I in Sound Forge and Vegas. Most of it is applicable to other audio apps as well. You can find it here -> https://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?p=1457678#1457678

    Let me know what you think.
    Read my blog here.
    Quote Quote  
  21. Originally Posted by guns1inger
    If anyone is interested, I have just posted a guide to using V.I in Sound Forge and Vegas. Most of it is applicable to other audio apps as well. You can find it here -> https://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?p=1457678#1457678

    Let me know what you think.
    Excellent guide, gunslinger. By the way, you're right about MP3s not being the best source. Not only is the stereo image often mangled, but I've found that V.I unmasks a lot of compression artifacts that are sort of buried in the mix. The psychoacoustic tricks that aid in compressing sound to 2-channel MP3 just don't work when you start digging around underneatht it all!

    I've played around with V.I in Vegas but I wasn't able to succeed with anything. the original V.I plugin loads as a track effect but it doesn't seem to work. It won't load on the surround master bus (I also have a prototype 6-in/6-out version of V.I that won't work either in on the surround master bus). I tried adding the 2-IO plugins to three tracks but I couldn't get the routing sorted out. I'm still a complete Vegas newbie so perhaps with a bit of time, I'll sort it out.

    Thanks for the guide.

    Regards,
    Steve.
    Quote Quote  
  22. By the way, if anyone is looking for other guides based on V.I Suite plugins, I've published the following guides over at Doom9. I'll redo them in PDFs for download from my site soon, but for now you can check them out online:Enjoy!
    Steve.
    Quote Quote  
  23. Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic U
    Search Comp PM
    I played around a bit in Vegas with the busses but like you, couldn't get it all tied together. I think it can be done with the 2 IO effects, but you would still have to process the tracks and cancel channels for the centre and LFE, so it's not realtime. I'll keep playing and hopefully put together a Vegas only guide soon.
    Read my blog here.
    Quote Quote  
  24. Originally Posted by guns1inger
    I played around a bit in Vegas with the busses but like you, couldn't get it all tied together. I think it can be done with the 2 IO effects, but you would still have to process the tracks and cancel channels for the centre and LFE, so it's not realtime. I'll keep playing and hopefully put together a Vegas only guide soon.
    Yes I think you're on the right track. From what I've been reading, it amounts to duplicating tracks a few times, cancelling channels, then panning to the appropriate outputs. Keep going!
    Quote Quote  
  25. Doesn't Audacity support VSTs?
    Quote Quote  
  26. Originally Posted by dvd3500
    Doesn't Audacity support VSTs?
    Not very well. It uses a "VST enabler" addon that offers no GUI support. I've tried it with the 2-IO V.I plugins and it doesn't support them. If you want a good freeware program that supports VSTs quite well, try Kristal Audio Engine. It's more of a multitrack recorder than a wave editor, but it works well and support VSTs very well.

    Regards,
    Steve.
    Quote Quote  
  27. OK. Thanks, eh!
    Quote Quote  
  28. Aren't you the same person that incorporated HDMp3 as well?
    http://www.macworld.co.uk/digitallifestyle/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=25467
    Quote Quote  
  29. Member lacywest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    California
    Search Comp PM
    interesting ... keep this thread alive ... please
    Quote Quote  
  30. Originally Posted by ranosb
    Aren't you the same person that incorporated HDMp3 as well?
    http://www.macworld.co.uk/digitallifestyle/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=25467
    "Thomson" isn't a person! Sorry.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!