VideoHelp Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 32
FirstFirst ... 5 13 14 15 16 17 25 ... LastLast
Results 421 to 450 of 944
Thread
  1. yeah noticed that, but you always learn something new!
    Quote Quote  
  2. When is the source interlaced that needs deinterlacing then?
    i tried a VHS movie with a part that was interlaced, but it worked both with QTGMC() and TFM(), which makes me confused.
    Quote Quote  
  3. If it's a movie then it's telecined 23.976fps. That is, you'd need a full IVTC of TFM().TDecimate() to return it from the interlaced 29.97fps. Are you in NTSC land? If not, it's not telecined. If for no other reason than the much faster encoding speed, field-matching is preferable to deinterlacing with QTGMC. However, with VHS tapes, I can see how QTGMC might give a more pleasing result as it has some noise removal built in, which VHS tapes usually need.

    To answer the question, it's interlaced if shot using video cameras. You separate the fields or you bob the video, scroll to a place with movement, begin advancing a frame at a time in VDub(Mod), and every field (or bobbed frame) will be different. Each field is from a different point in time. With progressive sources each field will be pretty much identical to its partner.
    Quote Quote  
  4. PAL country here

    Okay, but so, itīs only video cameras in the long run which should "need" QTGMC?
    otherwise itīs give and take for the noise removal?

    But wonīt QTGMC() fail on vhs and stuff if itīs like games, where itīs progressive, it will fail noticing color changes on occasions?
    Quote Quote  
  5. There are lots of conditions under which you could use QTGMC, particularly if the time it takes to encode is no consideration. You can, for example, run it over a progressive source to smooth out aliasing. I use it for that quite a lot when end credits are flickering like crazy. It has a special setting for that. You can use it as a bobber for blend removal filters, like SRestore. And you can use it as a deinterlacer for video sources, with either single or double framerate results.

    So, no, I wouldn't necessarily say only video sources might benefit from its use.

    I haven't used it for gaming footage before (I don't cap games), but I do use it on VHS captured sources. My interests are in old and black and white movies from VHS, and I have no knowledge of it messing with the colors.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Hmm, true, QTGMC got some really nice feautures like noise reduction and other things that really does a good jobb.
    So itīs up to the results in the end i guess


    A question, is there a way to TFM() this, without it failing thanks to (uneven field matching??).

    EDIT: Is there a way to capture in virtualdub, and make it work like fraps or, with it making a new file every 4gb, but maybe a new file every 2 min or something?

    EDIT 2: seems like Spill Drive is the solution i was looking for
    Image Attached Files
    Last edited by zerowalker; 5th Feb 2012 at 16:52.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Originally Posted by zerowalker View Post
    A question, is there a way to TFM() this, without it failing thanks to (uneven field matching??).
    I don't now what you're asking here. But your sample video has screwed up chroma channels.
    Quote Quote  
  8. If you use TFM() one frame will be messed up, with lines, looks corrupted, i think it fails so Deinterlace or what to call it.

    It has?
    How can you see that?

    Oh maybe you mean the dots all over colored areas?
    well itīs S-video that fails there.

    EDIT: ehm, i asked before when to use QTGMC, and looked at an n64 capture, and there QTGMC looked way better, and with Converttoyv12(interlaced=true)
    AssumeTFF()

    it worked like a charm.

    TFM() worked, but was edgy, (the capture was very noisy and stuff like that)

    How come Chroma isnīt failing there, is it true interlacing?
    Last edited by zerowalker; 5th Feb 2012 at 17:52.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Along side the question above, i was wondering, how much noise does Component have if you compare it with composite and S-video (though i only get bad s-video though)?
    Quote Quote  
  10. Originally Posted by zerowalker View Post
    If you use TFM() one frame will be messed up, with lines, looks corrupted, i think it fails so Deinterlace or what to call it.
    I think you're talking about residual come artifacts on the grey wall. 2x point resize:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	residual.png
Views:	282
Size:	676.5 KB
ID:	10832

    If you turn off post processing, TFM(pp=0), you'll see that it happens because an interlaced frame has gotten through the field matcher. But the post processor didn't recognize some of the combing in the grey wall and let it through. You can try playing with the different pp modes. TFM() also has a decombing threshold setting you can try playing around with, cthresh.

    Originally Posted by zerowalker View Post
    It has?
    How can you see that?
    Regarding the messed up chroma: apply a simple bob (or any of the smart bobs) and watch the yellow color in the windows. See how it moves differently than the grey walls. A crop from the top of the frame:

    Name:  offset.png
Views: 438
Size:  61.7 KB

    Name:  offset2.png
Views: 455
Size:  62.7 KB

    Originally Posted by zerowalker View Post
    EDIT: ehm, i asked before when to use QTGMC, and looked at an n64 capture, and there QTGMC looked way better, and with Converttoyv12(interlaced=true)
    AssumeTFF()

    it worked like a charm.
    Basically, you use QTGMC() when you want to deinterlace truly interlaced material. But people sometimes use it on progressive material because it also does a little noise reduction and antialiasing of edges. But you can use it any time you want.

    Originally Posted by zerowalker View Post
    TFM() worked, but was edgy, (the capture was very noisy and stuff like that)

    How come Chroma isnīt failing there, is it true interlacing?
    The chroma problem is visible with Bob(), TFM(), QTGMC(), Yadif(), any deinterlacer -- because it's in the source. I think an interlaced YV12 video was treated as progressive YV12 at some point.

    I'm having some problems with your sample though. When I use AviSource() to open it I get an error message from AviSynth -- "couldn't locate a decompressor for fourcc ffds". So I used ffMpegSource2() instead. I get interlaced YV12 out of that. So it's possible ffmpeg is causing the chroma problem. What are you using to decompress the video? Do you see the same chroma problem pictured above?

    Originally Posted by zerowalker View Post
    Along side the question above, i was wondering, how much noise does Component have if you compare it with composite and S-video (though i only get bad s-video though)?
    Component should have better resolution than s-video and composite. It should be free of dot crawl artifacts. Though S-video should be free of dot crawl artifacts too so I'm not hopeful it will help you.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Okay wait i will clip the same and make it lagarith to make sure everything is fine with the decoding part

    And yeah have tried many kinds of settings with TFM() but itīs hard to make it deinterlace without faling on progressive parts with some parts.

    Okay, good to know as QTGMC really is awesome at some points

    EDIT: It seems to work with using pp=3/4, but it deinterlace the whole picture, so the text is affected, but maybe itīs supposed to be so
    Image Attached Files
    Last edited by zerowalker; 8th Feb 2012 at 23:36.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Along with the above, i must ask once more.
    About Decrawling etc. I always get those, Lines, like ZigZag, but it wasnīt herringbone, it was crosstalk as Jagabo said ( i think)
    So can someone direct me to a, filter solution for that in the meanwhile, as i probably canīt get S-video vhs and stuff soon
    Quote Quote  
  13. Your latest cap no longer has those chroma problems.
    Quote Quote  
  14. Yeah it was an decoding issue
    Quote Quote  
  15. I am trying to solve the dot crawl, and the Color fading along it with no success.
    Here is a restored sample, but with dot crawl pretty much all over edges.
    Image Attached Files
    Quote Quote  
  16. It's not possible to entirely remove dot crawl artifacts without damaging other parts of the picture.
    Quote Quote  
  17. Well pretty muched guessed so, as well the dot crawl is pretty heavy.
    But will try the way of using a DVD as passthrough to S-video if i can just get some answers later on in the other topic.
    As that is hopefully one way to solve it i hope
    Quote Quote  
  18. Does anyone know of resoration on DVD recorded VHS tapes, which pretty much are full of interlacing and artifacts?
    I myself am trying out some stuff, pretty much QTGMC() and Motion Compenstation.

    But maybe there is more?
    Image Attached Files
    Last edited by zerowalker; 12th Feb 2012 at 10:48.
    Quote Quote  
  19. Originally Posted by zerowalker View Post
    But will try the way of using a DVD as passthrough to S-video if i can just get some answers later on in the other topic.
    As that is hopefully one way to solve it i hope
    You mean using the DVD recorder's passthrough to split composite to s-video? That will only help if the luma/chroma splitter in the DVD recorder is better than the luma/chroma splitter in your capture device.
    Quote Quote  
  20. Oh;S
    Thought it helped if i could give the capture device S-video as someone stated could be better for some reasons.
    If not, then well, the end is the same that i will need an vcr with S-video, TBC can come later.

    But please watch the mpeg2, and tell me what you think (sadly i chose wrong, they are not the same, but itīs the same frames though difference episodes)
    Quote Quote  
  21. Do someone know if there is a way to prevent the Fuzzines or how to put it, that seems to come from Motion Compensation script?

    Code:
    SetMemoryMax(700)
    SetMTMode(5, 4)
    MPEG2Source("F:\Desktop\Zelda test.d2v", cpu=4)
    QTGMC()
    SelectEven()
    #DeHalo_alpha(rx=2, ry=1, darkstr=1, brightstr=1.5, lowsens=150, highsens=150, ss=1.5)
     # Motion compensation on frame -2...+2
    super = MSuper ()
    vf2 = super.MAnalyse (isb=false, delta=2, overlap=4)
    vf1 = super.MAnalyse (isb=false, delta=1, overlap=4)
    vb1 = super.MAnalyse (isb=true,  delta=1, overlap=4)
    vb2 = super.MAnalyse (isb=true,  delta=2, overlap=4)
    cf2 = MCompensate (super, vf2, thSAD=400)
    cf1 = MCompensate (super, vf1, thSAD=400)
    cb1 = MCompensate (super, vb1, thSAD=400)
    cb2 = MCompensate (super, vb2, thSAD=400)
    
    # dfttest on motion-compensated clip
    Interleave (cf2, cf1, last, cb1, cb2)
    dfttest (sigma=32, sigma2=32, tbsize=5, lsb=true)
    
    SelectEvery (5, 2)
    
    # Gradient smoothing
    presmooth = last
    SmoothGrad (radius=20, thr=0.15)
    SmoothGrad (radius=12, thr=0.25, ref=presmooth)
    
    # Back to 8 bits, ordered dithering
    
    LSFMod(strength=80)
    fslg_dither_to_n_bits (10, outn=true)
    Dither_convey_yuv4xxp16_on_yvxx()
    Distributor()
    
    # The last part is for exporting to 10bit, other than than itīs the same as 8 bit:)

    Itīs the black that is like, i donīt know;S
    itīs not Flat or something, donīt know the word, i think itīs from dithering, but not sure.

    Hope you understand, if not will will try to explain better!
    Image Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Zelda Del 1 - Test - 10 Bit.mkv - 00000.png
Views:	239
Size:	471.0 KB
ID:	10907  

    Click image for larger version

Name:	VTS_01_1.VOB - 00007.png
Views:	249
Size:	504.9 KB
ID:	10908  

    Quote Quote  
  22. I have problem Deinterlacing a PAL DVD, i tried QTGMC with Srestore, but no matter how i use QTGMC i get ghosting.
    Does anyone know why?
    Quote Quote  
  23. Not all videos can be de-ghosted.
    Quote Quote  
  24. Yeah but i donīt get it with TFM(), but TFM fails on some frames, it doesnīt deinterlace etc.

    And yeah, itīs cartoon, so i know that it may have Ghosting to make it "smooth" or how to put it. but it doesnīt seem to have it.

    And QTGMC creates ghosting even on progressive frames on the source;S
    Quote Quote  
  25. If you want answers about a source, don't ask questions; provide untouched samples from the source. But as mentioned, some sources are so crappy they can't be fixed.

    QTGMC doesn't 'create' ghosting.
    Quote Quote  
  26. Here is a sample

    And well QTGMC has created ghosting for me, when it fails to deinterlace, but TFM works then so itīs probably not interlaced i guess.
    Image Attached Files
    Quote Quote  
  27. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    New York, US
    Search Comp PM
    Not interlaced ? ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	New.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	135.6 KB
ID:	10979
    Quote Quote  
  28. Originally Posted by zerowalker View Post
    Here is a sample

    And well QTGMC has created ghosting for me, when it fails to deinterlace, but TFM works then so itīs probably not interlaced i guess.
    That video just has a weird cadence. Some of the original film frames last only one field, some two fields, some three fields, etc. I suggest you QTGMC() it an encode at 50 fps if you need it progressive. Or maybe, after QTGMC(), try TDecimate() in mode 2 or 7 to get some lower frame rate.
    Last edited by jagabo; 16th Feb 2012 at 14:52.
    Quote Quote  
  29. So itīs messed up interlace i guess, but do i really have to go with 50fps?
    Is it really that many real frames?

    Sanlyn, with that i mean it could be some meesed up interlace, not ordinary, which seems to be the case.
    Quote Quote  
  30. Originally Posted by zerowalker View Post
    So itīs messed up interlace i guess, but do i really have to go with 50fps?
    Is it really that many real frames?

    Sanlyn, with that i mean it could be some meesed up interlace, not ordinary, which seems to be the case.
    The interlacing isn't messed up. It looks like the original was about 15 fps progressive. It has gone through some weird telecine pattern to get 50 fields per second. It may be hard to get it back to the original ~15 fps progressive frames without some duplicates and some dropped frames. Or it may be a mix of frame rates. So it's easiest to just encode it as 50 fps progressive. That way the cadence won't be any worse than the original DVD or broadcast.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!